** Changed in: debian
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
** Changed in: debian
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
htt
** Changed in: gnomescan (Baltix)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: gnomescan (Baltix)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mantas Kriaučiūnas (mantas)
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Mr. Filoni did not comment, libgnomescan doesn't have any other rdeps,
so there. Marking as fix released, unassigning myself.
** Changed in: gnomescan (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: gnomescan (Ubuntu Karmic)
Assignee: Philipp Kern (pkern) => (unassigne
i subscribed him seconds before posting my comment #52 some minutes ago
he may well be still unaware -- but not for long :)
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Well, Devid Antonio Filoni (the packager) is already subscribed to
this bug, I guess they will be notified of the package name problem.
:)
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
subscribe d.filoni
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:21:50AM -, Philipp Sadleder wrote:
> I don't use Ubuntu Karmic, so just from the ChangeLog I see that
> gnomescan got an update.
>
> http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/g/gnomescan/gnomescan_0.6.2-0ubuntu1/changelog
>
> has ver
that package does not include the proposed name change. it has been
developed completely disregarding the progress here.
@Philipp (Kern) and Devid: what package should be chosen and how should
be proceeded?
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this b
I don't use Ubuntu Karmic, so just from the ChangeLog I see that
gnomescan got an update.
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/g/gnomescan/gnomescan_0.6.2-0ubuntu1/changelog
has version 0.6.2-0ubuntu1 and looks like all the work has been done
twice now.
Best regards,
Philipp
Not even squeezing everything into gnomescan makes apt-get consider it.
I also tried to apply some Breaks magic but it seems that I'm unable to
convince apt-get what I mean. aptitude just works. Oh well...
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this b
Maybe apt-get prefers real packages over provided ones and as the old
flegita and flegita-gimp are still available on my system it considers
the old gnomescan to be broken by this change. If this would really be
the case there shouldn't be a problem on distro upgrades unless the old
release is sti
debian/control (just added the provides, I tried without it before):
Provides: flegita, flegita-gimp
Conflicts: flegita, flegita-gimp, libgnomescan0, gnomescan (<< 0.6.2-0ubuntu2)
Replaces: flegita, flegita-gimp, libgnomescan0, gnomescan (<< 0.6.2-0ubuntu2)
I get that on dist-upgrade (upgrade doe
Sadly I still face problems in the upgrade tests when trying to update
from gnomescan in jaunty to the new gnome-scan with a dash. apt-get
does not accept my hints for upgrade, neither for dist-upgrade. It
works with aptitude, though.
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
** Changed in: gnomescan (Ubuntu Karmic)
Assignee: Etienne BERSAC (bersace) => Philipp Kern (pkern)
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
2009/7/2 Michael Nagel :
> if i understand correctly, gnome-scan intends the following design:
>
> the functional backend:
> - libgnomescan
>
> providing functionality for various frontends:
> - flegita, a standalone program for scanning documents
> - flegita-gimp, a gimp-plugin for tight integrati
if i understand correctly, gnome-scan intends the following design:
the functional backend:
- libgnomescan
providing functionality for various frontends:
- flegita, a standalone program for scanning documents
- flegita-gimp, a gimp-plugin for tight integration with the gimp
- other frontend progr
Hi,
I said all i had to say about the upstream project. You can do as you
want for packaging, i'll take your package source as new base for my PPA
for development releases.
I agree that the packaging is overkill for the current status. So let
simplify that and do as you think is the best.
Regard
I agree that it's a long-term plan to have libgnomescan available. In
its current form I'd rather not have it, though, especially if you don't
intend to bump SONAMEs on ABI changes. Especially I cannot put this new
library into libgnomescan0 and the package naming is generally derived
from the SO
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 01:36:05PM -, Etienne BERSAC wrote:
> The library is used by the gimp plugin too. The main goal of the
> project is to provide a library for other application (like GtkPrint)
> not (ony) replacing xsane.
Sure, but I won't update libgnomescan0 with the same SONAME breaki
Hi,
The library is used by the gimp plugin too. The main goal of the
project is to provide a library for other application (like GtkPrint)
not (ony) replacing xsane.
Regards,
Étienne
--
E Ultreïa !
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug noti
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:35:45PM -, Etienne BERSAC wrote:
> 2009/6/30 Philipp Kern :
> > As I guess libgnomescan changed from 0.4 to 0.6, did it break API/ABI?
> > If so, it should bump the SONAME and thus the package name to prevent
> > incompatibilities.
> Total break. However, i would like
2009/6/30 Philipp Kern :
> As I guess libgnomescan changed from 0.4 to 0.6, did it break API/ABI?
> If so, it should bump the SONAME and thus the package name to prevent
> incompatibilities.
Total break. However, i would like not to increment ABI version before
stable or at least beta. API is so s
As I guess libgnomescan changed from 0.4 to 0.6, did it break API/ABI?
If so, it should bump the SONAME and thus the package name to prevent
incompatibilities.
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Hi,
2009/6/30 Philipp Kern :
> I'm currently changing some bits of the packaging based on Étienne's and
> will upload the result to karmic in the next days
Thanks.
> Étienne, the package's homepage on http://projects.gnome.org/gnome-
> scan/index looks horribly out-of-date, especially the downlo
I'm currently changing some bits of the packaging based on Étienne's and
will upload the result to karmic in the next days.
Étienne, the package's homepage on http://projects.gnome.org/gnome-
scan/index looks horribly out-of-date, especially the download section.
This URL is also referenced by deb
** Tags added: desktop-upgrade
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
** Changed in: debian
Status: Unknown => New
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #395334
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395334
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395334
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnomescan
** Tags added: needs-packaging
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
Regards,
Le mardi 09 juin 2009 à 12:55 +, Philipp Kern a écrit :
> Etienne, was there any progress on this?
Uploaded. Sorry for the delay.
Étienne.
--
E Ultreïa !
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Etienne, was there any progress on this?
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
Hi,
Only my PPA does have transitionnal package. I'll upload latest
debianization monday.
Regards,
Étienne
--
E Ultreïa !
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
nota bene: i updated the description (removed lengthy changelog,
included revu link)
there has been some activity in the ppa and on revu. i do not know where
the most up to date code and the master discussion thread is right now.
could this be clarified? is the package with transitional code uploa
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:54:15AM -, Étienne BERSAC wrote:
> Could you test source deb from revu, not PPA, since i can't upload to
> PPA due to bug #378790 .
> http://revu.ubuntuwire.org/p/gnome-scan
I left a comment there.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://
Hi,
Could you test source deb from revu, not PPA, since i can't upload to
PPA due to bug #378790 .
http://revu.ubuntuwire.org/p/gnome-scan
Regards,
Étienne.
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
* The package in the PPA fails to declare a build-dependency on
libglade2-dev (see FTBFS on karmic/lpia:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~pkern/+archive/ppa/+build/1037577).
* The description contains spelling mistakes (NB: I'm no native speaker):
Description: GNOME Scan Infrastructure
This meta packa
probably it should.
and imho the complete changelog is unnecessary here.
and imho it is not possible to get this in jaunty any more but we should
ask a motu to get it in karmic as soon as packages can be uploaded
there. or even better get it in debian so it arrives there
automatically.
feel free
Shouldn't the updated description refer to Jaunty instead of Hardy?
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnomescan
- Gnome-scan in hardy is very old.
+ Gnome-scan in hardy is very old; 0.6.2 version has been released, for
+ gnome 2.26, see http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-scan/0.6/
- 0.6.2 version has been released, for gnome 2.26
-
-
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/gnome-scan had some uploads and comments, but
nothing is going on since 13 Mar 2009.
This is very unfortunate, as gnome-scan upstream (Étienne and me) gets more and
more bug repors about very old 0.4 version.
If there is any remedy to get 0.6.2 into Jaunty, please he
Bersac: Nathan Handler has agreed to continue to review your gnomescan
package via REVU. Please feel free to get in touch with him (nhandler)
in #ubuntu-motu on irc.freenode.net
** Changed in: gnomescan (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cody A.W. Somerville (cody-somerville) => Étienne BERSAC
(bersace)
Cody: Is there a chance to get gnome-scan 0.6.2 into Jaunty, now that gegl 0.22
is in?
If any help is needed for that, I would be happy to help out.
Best regards,
Philipp
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are
According to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gegl/+bug/315778/comments/13
gegl 0.22 went into jaunty so gnome-scan could go in as well.
Best regards,
Philipp
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a m
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gegl/+bug/315778/comments/10
Letting gegl not Build-Depend on libopenraw-dev would avoid the "Dependency
wait."
Then gnome-scan 0.6.2 could go in.
Best regards,
Philipp
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You r
Hi,
I submitted updated packages http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/gnome-scan
but didn't got any feedback from motu. Wish i'm not too late.
Étienne
--
E Ultreïa !
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Awesome :) I'll keep an eye on that.
** Changed in: gnomescan (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Cody A.W. Somerville (cody-somerville)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because yo
When reading https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gegl I thought gegl
0.22 went into Jaunty already, but it actually is on Dependency wait.
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Unfortunately, GEGL 0.0.21 is needed and with being in Feature Freeze
we'll have to wait until Karmic.
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Hi, it would be nice to have 0.6.2 (latest stable upstream release) in jaunty.
0.4.1 is long obsolete and only leads to useless bug reports.
Best regards,
Philipp
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnomescan
Gnome-scan in hardy is very old.
- 0.6 version has been released
Cody, you commented on this package during the hardy freeze - is there
any chance that you have time to look at this now for jaunty?
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Note that 0.6.1 require GEGL 0.0.21 SVN due to a bug in GEGL that makes
images black.
Étienne.
--
E Ultreïa !
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubu
0.6.1 is out.
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubunt
Hi Étienne,
At least, it's possible to upgrade your PPA to have package for intrepid
?
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
Any progress on this? Any chance of still getting it into intrepid?
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
Hi,
GNOME Scan 0.4.1 is in universe while GNOME Scan 0.6 is in my PPA. Looks
like ubuntu packagers are repackagin gnome-scan. Let me upload it to
revu.
Regards,
Étienne.
--
E Ultreïa !
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification beca
Hi all,
I'm on Intrepid and can't find gnome-scan in the general archive. I'm not
subscribing to any PPA's but would love to see the UI and things .
Note for self :- Look up his blog http://blogs.gnome.org/gnome-scan/ as
much as possible.
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpa
** Changed in: gnomescan (Ubuntu)
Assignee: David Futcher (bobbo) => (unassigned)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
** Changed in: gnomescan (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => David Futcher (bobbo)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Hi,
GNOME Scan 0.X is not "production ready". You should disable automatic
color enhancement in order to save CPU. Anyway, 0.6 is far better than
0.4.
Regards,
Étienne.
--
E Ultreïa !
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification becau
Just wondering if 0.6 is production ready. I just installed it from
Etienne's ppa, I'm scanning full pages at 600dpi, the scanner gets
detected, per-scan works, but after launching "Scan", the program seems
to get stuck in the "processing image" step. Forever means at least 25
minutes keeping CPU a
can't ./configure this package, reports no sane present even though sane
is intalled
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
** Also affects: gnomescan (Baltix)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Please update to latest 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193818
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
62 matches
Mail list logo
