[Bug 1877089] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From thorsten.di...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-11 03:37 EDT--- Hi Dimitri, now I understood. As mentioned in LP1876715 (LTC 185713) in my last recent comments, the naming problem is fixed with zfcpdump-kernel 5.4-0ubuntu1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 1877089] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From thorsten.di...@de.ibm.com 2020-12-10 13:43 EDT--- I updated to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=3&queue_text=zfcpdump-kernel as of focal-proposed. Then I zipled the SCSI dump LUN: root@t35lp25:~# zipl -d /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-36005076303ffd327

[Bug 1877089] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-08-26 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-08-26 09:14 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status-> closed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877089 Title: zfcpdump kernel can not be IP

[Bug 1877089] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-07-31 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From stefan.haberl...@de.ibm.com 2020-07-31 07:14 EDT--- This is currently not supported. As of today there is no code in zipl that writes signature entries for a dump kernel. This was not part of the initial item. It might be addressed in the future. -- You received this bu

[Bug 1877089] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-05-20 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From pr...@de.ibm.com 2020-05-20 07:39 EDT--- (In reply to comment #14) > Thank you for those details. > > For example, if and when we bump ubuntu minimum abi to z15 we might be able > to kill the zfcpdump kernel. That's at least my hope. There's an other problem I keep forgett

[Bug 1877089] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-05-12 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From pr...@de.ibm.com 2020-05-12 11:56 EDT--- Hi xnox, we need a separate flavor because zfcpdump kernels (on pre z15) are limited to 64M of memory. Any stock kernel would run oom in such a constrained environment. (In reply to comment #11) > Hm, I'm not sure we can sign the z

[Bug 1877089] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-05-06 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From thorsten.di...@de.ibm.com 2020-05-06 08:28 EDT--- (In reply to comment #6) > We can either revert the path change in s390-tools or rebuild the zfcpdump > kernel flavour with the new name. This should IMO be decided by the s390tools maintainer! (I personally prefer the latt