This does not seem to be a problem for IE7 or Google Chrome on Windows
XP. Both use 10% CPU or less when the site is loaded.
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Can somebody give some evidence this is not an issues w/ the website
rather than poor javascript/java code?
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Marking invalid for Linux. This is not an issue with Linux.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I reopen the bug for firefox, because other browsers don't have this
bug, so firefox causes this. If anyone knows better, please correct.
Would it make sense to open an Xorg bug for this?
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https:
How is this invalid? It's still a major problem for me.
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9 (Ubuntu)
> Status: Incomplete => Invalid
>
> ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
> Status: Incomplete => Invalid
>
> ** Also aff
Why is this bug filed against linux? Firefox uses the whole CPU.
I think the JavaScript is very bad written or firefox has a bug or (what
I assume most) there is a problem with the rendering. If the
'newsticker' moves, the whole thing must be new rendered. And if the
graphics card can't do this, b
** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 04:03:21PM -, krom wrote:
> For me problem disappeared after installing latest nvidia beta drivers
> (180.06)
>
affects ubuntu/xulrunner-1.9
status invalid
affects ubuntu/firefox
status invalid
affects ubuntu/linux
status new
thanks
- Alexander
--
high cpu
For me problem disappeared after installing latest nvidia beta drivers
(180.06)
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
Also, I got a chance to test this with the mga driver, and the problem is still
there (also, the computer was a P3, and scrolling even plain text was
definitely choppy).
Kari
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You received this bug notification becau
> please test the cairo package from hardy-proposed
Tested with the nv driver, and doesn't help - cannot test with nouveau,
as my X refuses to start with the latest snapshot.
Kari
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You received this bug notification b
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:55:03PM -, Kari Aliranta wrote:
>
> Well, I was wild and installed Nouveau driver for my Nvidia card to get EXA
> working. The result: about 15% improvement in the benchmark for FF3, but I
> get hugely improved (>2X) results in Gtkperf text scrolling benchmark and
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:55:03PM -, Kari Aliranta wrote:
>
> Well, I was wild and installed Nouveau driver for my Nvidia card to get EXA
> working. The result: about 15% improvement in the benchmark for FF3, but I
> get hugely improved (>2X) results in Gtkperf text scrolling benchmark and
I've been experimenting with Fedora 9 and note that the same issue
occurs with Firefox 3.
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
So, what's the solution ?
_
Caroline vient de mettre à jour son profil Messenger ! Connectez-vous !
http://login.live.com/login.srf?wa=wsignin1.0&rpsnv=10&ct=1198837564&rver=4.0.1534.0&wp=MBI&wreply=http:%2F%2Fhome.services.spaces.live
Merely "reinstalling everything" is not at all a solution.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 9:58 PM, simtris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same issue, same effect here :)Ill réinstall everithing this evening. I
> think it ll solve that.Simon
> ___
Same issue, same effect here :)Ill réinstall everithing this evening. I think
it ll solve that.Simon
_
Caroline vient de mettre à jour son profil Messenger ! Connectez-vous !
http://login.live.com/login.srf?wa=wsignin1.0&rpsnv=10&ct=1
New information:
Using top, I noticed that most of the CPU usage during scrolling is
actually due to X, not Firefox process itself - X uses 60-90% of CPU
time, Firefox the rest. This may be normal or not, but anyway there is
another bug that has more information on that:
https://bugs.launchpad
Well, I was wild and installed Nouveau driver for my Nvidia card to get EXA
working. The result: about 15% improvement in the benchmark for FF3, but I get
hugely improved (>2X) results in Gtkperf text scrolling benchmark and
everything else is definitely faster, too. Very nice, but I wouldn't c
>Most likely the free nv is faster as you can use EXA AccellMethod
>... give it a try.
Sorry, but as the nv driver man page states, EXA is only supported for
G80 (Geforce 8xxx) and higher - with my card (Geforce 2), the driver
just ignores the option: "(WW) NV(0): Option "AccelMethod" is not used
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 01:40:48AM -, Kari Aliranta wrote:
> Sorry, no can do:
>
> My Xubuntu Hardy system had no problem with using Gutsy version of
> libcairo2 (didn't fix the Firefox problem either), but the Hardy version
> of Xserver wouldn't even start with the Gutsy version of libpixman
Sorry, no can do:
My Xubuntu Hardy system had no problem with using Gutsy version of
libcairo2 (didn't fix the Firefox problem either), but the Hardy version
of Xserver wouldn't even start with the Gutsy version of libpixman
(Well, I guess the Xorg guys were right when setting their
dependencies..
I tested removing xulrunner 1.9 altogether and using xulrunner 1.8 instead
(with FF2): didn't help, FF still scrolls a lot slower than in Gutsy --> would
definitely point to a Cairo problem. I'll try to downgrade Cairo to Gutsy
version (1.4.10) and see what happens.
Kari
--
high cpu load be
>We have cairo 1.6 not 1.4. what package are you running exactly?
Now, on Hardy, I run Cairo version 1.6.0 (libcairo2 version
1.6.0-0ubuntu1)
On Gutsy I was running version 1.4.10 (libcairo2 version
1.4.10-1ubuntu4.4) as I told above.
>pango cannot be disabled in ffox 3 anymore afaict.
Well,
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 09:41:27PM -, Kari Aliranta wrote:
> The abovementioned benchmark and Gtkperf results with FF 2.0.0.14 on GUTSY,
> with Pango disabled (to avoid https://launchpad.net/bugs/32561 ). The
> computer was a (now sold) 1.1Ghz Athlon with Nvidia Geforce 2 MX 400 and
> using
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 09:48:35PM -, Kari Aliranta wrote:
> Also, I forgot to mention:
>
> - Using the Nvidia proprietary driver doesn't help
>
> - I also tried using pure Vesa driver on my current computer - didn't
> help either (didn't make the things any worse, though)
>
> - The Cairo ve
Also, I forgot to mention:
- Using the Nvidia proprietary driver doesn't help
- I also tried using pure Vesa driver on my current computer - didn't
help either (didn't make the things any worse, though)
- The Cairo version on GUTSY test cases was the standard 1.4.10 form
Gutsy repos
Kari
--
h
** Attachment added: "xorg.conf"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15338471/xorg.conf
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
>Which cairo package version are you using? Are you using XAA or EXA
>accelmethod in X? Maybe attach your Xorg.0.log and xorg.conf
Alexander: Ok, I checked my notes, and here's some pretty detailed and a
bit corrected information (sorry for two posts, there are two
attachments and I only use the w
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:24:27PM -, Kari Aliranta wrote:
> Sorry, I'll take back my last comment. The javascript part of the test
> is actually 3 times faster in FF3 than on FF2, and the other tests are
> about the same on both versions on Hardy - also FF3 is about 4 times
> faster in Sunspid
So...
Somthing around Hardy ? Quite possible. Anyway I tried some fixes during this
time and I discover an French thread abaout this kind of problem. The advise
was to modify the /etc/hosts, this way :
127.0.0.1 localhost buntuStation
#127.0.1.1 buntuStation
The second line was the original on
Sorry, I'll take back my last comment. The javascript part of the test
is actually 3 times faster in FF3 than on FF2, and the other tests are
about the same on both versions on Hardy - also FF3 is about 4 times
faster in Sunspider benchmark than FF2. HOWEVER, FF2 on Gutsy was about
six times faster
Here's a benchmark originally created for another Firefox bug, but
probably usable also here, since it uses javascript:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/1585880/test.html
Personally, Firefox 3rc1 on Hardy took about 6 times more time to
complete all tests (not only text rendering) than Firefox 2 on
Same issue about me :
FF3 but same for FF2
Firefox is running very nice on windows but is a little slow on ubuntu. I have
an NVIDIA card and compiz activated.
My own website isn't very fluid : http://www.ubuntu-dijon.org/librexpo/
There bust be a smooth fading beteween each pages and on my Ubuntu
I can confirm what Pjotr12345 says, I even see ff3 b5 eating up to 50%
of my CPU under Windows XP when visiting that site, so it's a FF bug,
and it's cross platform.
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You received this bug notification because you are a
This bug is still present in Firefox 3.0 in Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron alpha 5.
Check http://www.kranten.com (the news ticker is the culprit).
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
@della: the bug has *nothing* to do with Nvidia. I have the bug on two
systems with Intel video cards. It's a bug in Firefox itself, in the way
it handles certain java scripts (news tickers). :-)
Greetz, Pjotr.
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You re
ok I think here we are facing a real nvidia driver problem.
You can read my various test on my two system on bug 144216 comments.
I can both experience the slow tab switching problem and also some
strongly javascript based sites (like www.netvibes.com that I use
everyday) are *really* slow with
Here ff3b3 on hardy up to date is very slow in switching between tabs.
Took more than a second, whatever the content of the tabs is.
FF3 is much faster on gutsy on my three years old desktop than in my new
laptop. Very slow in opening a new tab also.
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
http
this bug is in xulrunner 1.9.
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
-
the updated url in summary triggers the high cpu load for me.
** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
high cpu load because of JavaScript
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185469
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is t
41 matches
Mail list logo
