Thanks!
---
Jason Edgecombe | Linux Administrator
UNC Charlotte | The William States Lee College of Engineering
9201 University City Blvd. | Charlotte, NC 28223-0001
Phone: 704-687-1943
jwedg...@uncc.edu | http://engr.uncc.edu
Current active devel release (Future next LTS), now introduced a newer version
of adcli:
adcli | 0.9.0-1 | focal/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386,
ppc64el, s390x
** Also affects: adcli (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Won't Fix
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu F
Using "net ads" from the samba-common-bin package should work as an
alternative to using adcli.
Assuming the server is already connected to the AD using sssd you should
be able to run the following.
net ads join -k
net ads keytab list
net ads keytab add nfs
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu)
S
A bionic-backports request has been made via LP: #1846516
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Eoan)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Disco)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Xeni
** Changed in: adcli (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831448
Title:
adcli: not adding an additional service-name
To manage notifications ab
** Changed in: adcli (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831448
Title:
adcli: not adding an additional service-name
To manage notifications about t
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Eoan)
Status: In Progress => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831448
Title:
adcli: not adding an additional service-name
To manage notification
@bigon,
I made the request more "official" by reporting a bug in Debian against
adcli:
# adcli new release 0.9.0
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941583
Regards,
Eric
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #941583
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941583
**
Cool, thanks!
---
Jason Edgecombe | Linux Administrator
UNC Charlotte | The William States Lee College of Engineering
9201 University City Blvd. | Charlotte, NC 28223-0001
Phone: 704-687-1943
jwedg...@uncc.edu | http://engr.unc
To summarise, before talking about the Ubuntu specifics, for sure the
first step would be to make sure 0.9.0 (including the fixes needed for
this bug) is found in debian, then we'll be more amenable to discuss
further more about the Ubuntu potential options (SRU micro release,
bionic-backports, ...
if the "microrelease SRU" doesn't apply here, then as I stated earlier
maybe bionic-backport would suits better. Let's see what Laurent says.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831448
Titl
@bigon,
Is there any plan to bump adcli (universe package) version in
debian/unstable to 0.9.0 and then possibly the Ubuntu stable releases
using an SRU exception (taking into account the current freeze schedule)
something such as microreleases[0] with your MOTU privileges.
Since you are the "adc
@bigon,
Is there any plan to bump adcli version in debian/unstable to 0.9.0 and
then possibly the Ubuntu stable releases
(Xenial/Bionic/Disco/Eoan/F-Series(next development release)) using SRU
exception something such as microreleases[0] with your MOTU privileges
using this policy:
Since you are
Without looking further (so maybe more commits might be needed as well
or not) so far the observed commits needed are :
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/realmd/adcli/commit/163730cf8c91fc8dc4f44eb1eca45daa3abf3ed8
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/realmd/adcli/commit/8396b9bca05fec8022758c6930f1e594252
After analysis, the 2 mentioned fixes depends on a few other commits as
the fixes has been made on top and/or using functions not yet
implemented in version "0.8.2-1". Meaning there is a significant amount
of code change/add to be done that goes beyond the fix itself.
I'm afraid this won't be elig
Sounds good, thanks!
---
Jason Edgecombe | Linux Administrator
UNC Charlotte | The William States Lee College of Engineering
9201 University City Blvd. | Charlotte, NC 28223-0001
Phone: 704-687-1943
jwedg...@uncc.edu | http://e
I'm investigating the feasibility of the patchset's backport at the moment.
I'll update the bug as I make progress.
Regards,
Eric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831448
Title:
adcli
How can I get the new version to test?
---
Jason Edgecombe | Linux Administrator
UNC Charlotte | The William States Lee College of Engineering
9201 University City Blvd. | Charlotte, NC 28223-0001
Phone: 704-687-1943
jwedg...@u
$ rmadison adcli
adcli | 0.7.5-1 | trusty/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386,
powerpc, ppc64el
adcli | 0.8.1-1 | xenial/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386,
powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
adcli | 0.8.2-1 | bionic/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386,
ppc64el, s390x
adcli
** Also affects: adcli (Ubuntu Disco)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: adcli (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: adcli (Ubuntu Eoan)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Also affects: adcli (Ubuntu Bionic)
Im
Thanks! So I'm looking forward for someone is porting a new package for
ubuntu...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831448
Title:
adcli: not adding an additional service-name
To manage
Sorry, I gave the wrong RedHat errata link. Here is the right one:
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:2256
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831448
Title:
adcli: not adding an a
FYI, the related RedHat bugzilla bug is at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644311
** Also affects: adcli (CentOS) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644311
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Hi Alexander,
RedHat fixed this issue in
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0763.html , which is why CentOS7
works, but I think the patch needs to be ported to ubuntu.
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1644311
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644311
--
You received this
I've tested it on CentOS 7 as well and it is working there!
adcli -v update --service-name="nfs/centos7" --os-version=centos -D
DOMAIN -C /tmp/krb5cc_0 --show-details
This adds nfs service principals on centos 7 with adcli 0.8.1
# yum info adcli
Geladene Plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
Loadi
I'm having an issue with using adcli to add a service name on Ubuntu
18.04 as well. It works on RHEL8.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831448
Title:
adcli: not adding an additional se
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831448
Title:
adcl
27 matches
Mail list logo
