The hwdb-client package has been removed from Ubuntu. Closing all
related bugs.
** Changed in: hwdb-client (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
The code is still in 8.04, the package is now called hwdb-client-gnome.
The code still has the fault of not coping with `route -n' returning
nothing. hwdb-client-gnome 0.6.14.
$ sed -n '/def getroute/,/^$/p' /usr/bin/hwdb-gui
def getroute(self):
for line in os.popen('route -n'):
This package was removed from Hardy 8.04 and all future versions of
Ubuntu to date. Therefore this bug is being closed. Without this
package, this is no longer an issue.
** Changed in: hwdb-client (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
hwdb raises Exception when looking up route
https:
On Tuesday, September 14, 2010 21:31:01 rusivi1 wrote:
> Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
>
> Does this issue occur in Lucid?
>
> ** Changed in: hwdb-client (Ubuntu)
>Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
I don't know, moved on long since. Probably best is to test it y
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Does this issue occur in Lucid?
** Changed in: hwdb-client (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
hwdb raises Exception when looking up route
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18125
You received this bug notification because yo
** Changed in: hwdb-client (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Oliver Grawert (ogra) => (unassigned)
--
hwdb raises Exception when looking up route
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18125
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs
In bug #18283 Oliver Grawert says "its a general problem with the error
handling in the route code that needs to be rewritten". Perhaps the
route code does need to be re-written but most people are getting bit by
one specific instance, that of `route -n' not outputting a default root;
see bug #182
This bug isn't fixed. It would have been but too many other bugs have
wrongly been made a duplicate of it when they have a separate fault that
needs fixing. We're now in the confusing situation where sebas
reasonably thinks the bug is fixed because the fault he reported has
gone, whereas I know t
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 12:33:06 Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Do you mean that your original problem that you identified as related to
> PATH is no longer happening. Or do you mean that all the other issues
> in the bugs that have been marked as a duplicate of this one have been
> fixed, e.g. bug #1
Hi Sebas,
Do you mean that your original problem that you identified as related to
PATH is no longer happening. Or do you mean that all the other issues
in the bugs that have been marked as a duplicate of this one have been
fixed, e.g. bug #18283.
Cheers, Ralph.
--
hwdb raises Exception when l
It works now.
** Changed in: hwdb-client (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
hwdb raises Exception when looking up route
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18125
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bu
Another bunch of bugs have just been made a duplicate of this one, just
like the bug I raised: bug #18283. Like mine, they give a better report
on what the problem is than this red herring of /sbin not being in PATH.
If anyone fancies a crack at fixing this, please see bug #18283 and the
others fo
12 matches
Mail list logo
