[Bug 1800467] Re: qtquickcontrols2-5-private-dev package missing

2018-10-29 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Then unfortunately I will close it as wontfix. Private headers are unstable API/ABI so they add us many problems like marking private symbols, rebuilding all reverse dependencies when something changes, dealing with build failures, etc. If the headers are useful in your application, I recommend y

[Bug 1800467] Re: qtquickcontrols2-5-private-dev package missing

2018-10-29 Thread Kevin Funk
Okay, granted, in this case these private headers are needed for working on a commercial application (can't disclose this one). I don't think KDE currently needs this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1800467] Re: qtquickcontrols2-5-private-dev package missing

2018-10-29 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi! We usually ship private headers only when some other Qt module needs them. We can also make an exception in case some packaged KDE software starts to need these headers. What needs them in your case? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc