[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2019-04-25 Thread Richard Neighbour
GDB installed and it's now showing some more info. Config: Selene (Bacula host) has just been upgraded to Disco, Bacula now version 9.4.2. Bat running from Selene via ssh tunnel (ssh -X userxxx@selene) Client -> Status Client causes FD to fail, Bat still reports new version of client and so

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2019-01-12 Thread Radoslaw Korzeniewski
Thanks, unfortunate the traceback is not working properly for your environment: /usr/sbin/btraceback: 60: /usr/sbin/btraceback: gdb: not found (...) Could you install a gdb and resend a newly generated traceback files? Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2019-01-09 Thread Richard Neighbour
Sorry, just rediscovered this. Attached a whole bunch of tracebacks for you. =R ** Attachment added: "Tracebacks" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1800040/+attachment/5228050/+files/bacula_fd-traceback.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2018-11-09 Thread Radoslaw Korzeniewski
Hello, could someone attach a Bacula *.traceback generated by this sigsegv, please. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800040 Title: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2018-11-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800040 Title: bacula-fd se

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2018-11-05 Thread Richard Neighbour
Yes, looks to me like it's armhf build of bacula-fd that's the issue - 7.0.5 worked fine and bconsole provides a workaround so it's not a showstopper. FWIW, A-X-A on Karl's list works too. I'm happy to test and poke around at OS level, but as for providing patches, no chance. I haven't touched any

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2018-11-05 Thread Karl Stenerud
Thanks Richard! >From the testing so far, we have: [Director FD Bat] [A A A] FAIL [A A X] FAIL [A X A] (not tested) [A X X] works [X A A] (not tested) [X A X] FAIL [X X A] (not tested) [X X X] works >From the look of things, the critical element appears to be bacula-fd running on armhf. -- You

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2018-11-05 Thread Robie Basak
(if I'm wrong about the armhf thing, please let us know) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800040 Title: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2018-11-05 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for your detailed investigations. As this bug appears to manifest only when armhf is involved, I'm marking it as Importance: Low due to "unusual end-user configurations or uncommon hardware" from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance Unfortunately I don't expect anyone to spend time o

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2018-11-04 Thread Richard Neighbour
Test 5 - Bat on armhf fails too. Test Director FD . . Bat . .Client Status result 1 . .armhf . .armhf .x86 . .fails - bacula-fd terminated 2 . .armhf . .x86 . .x86 . .works (various bacula-fd versions) 3 . .x86 . . .x86 . .x86 . .works 4 . .x86 . . .armhf .x86 . .fails - bacula-fd terminated. 5 .

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2018-11-01 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800040 Title: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat To manage notifications abo

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2018-10-31 Thread Richard Neighbour
Hi Christian Yes, x86 clients tested on Win10, Win7, Win7x64, Win-Ancient_Server (5.2.10, 7.0.5, 7.4.4, 9.0.6), Mint x64, Mint i386 (7.0.5), CentOS 7.5 (5.2.13), Ubuntu 18.04 (9.0.6). No clients have been deleted recently, although a few won't see in the new year. The Windows clients will be getti

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2018-10-29 Thread  Christian Ehrhardt 
Hi, I tried to do the same from "bat" but it just happened to work for me. See attached screenshot (I waited a bit, no fail later). I had bacula just configured by installing it and pressing enter at every question (config for local pgsql DB essentially). I have not changed any other config and I

[Bug 1800040] Re: bacula-fd segfault on status client from Bat

2018-10-29 Thread  Christian Ehrhardt 
Actually I guess "mix of Windows & Linux 32 and 64bit" implies that x86 client was tested. So let me try to clarify: - server armhf, bacula-fd armhf, bat on remote x86 - works - server armhf, bacula-fd armhf, bat on same armhf - fails Is that correct? If so does it also fail right out of the box