*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1837444 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837444
Lucas identified this beign the same as one that he works on.
Marking as duplicate.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1837444
pstree seg fault
--
You received this bug notification because
My reliable repro was actually a much less intensive `watch 'pstree
-aup' | grep "..."`
With the default watch interval of 2 seconds, I would reliably hit this
1-2 times per day with it running continuously in the background.
Process churn isn't crazy, but I am regularly compiling various things.
Note: I'm asking as a SRU [1] usually needs sort of a reproduction steps
guide to verify - and since I fail to recreate ...
[1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
The offending line you identified was not fixed as a bug fix that one
could directly backport, but instead as part of [1]
Instead for an SRU we would need a more surgical approach, maybe just a check
to the pointer like:
if (file != NULL)
fclose(file);
I'm not so sure about the priority of t
I think you are right here, not sure what happened to the triager of
march 14th.
23 is in Artful and Bionic already.
So the question here is to backport via an SRU to Xenial
** Also affects: psmisc (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: psmisc (Ubuntu)
After two weeks of no response, is this the wrong venue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755681
Title:
pstree crashes on fclose(NULL)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
ht
