[Bug 174162] Re: cannot bind to YP server under AMD64

2009-08-07 Thread Jack Deslippe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 50430 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50430 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 152794 nis daemon fails to attach to domain the first time it is run in Gutsy ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 50430 NIS has problems starting befo

[Bug 174162] Re: cannot bind to YP server under AMD64

2009-05-05 Thread fil
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 152794 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152794 #152794 itself is duplicate of #50430. This one blocks setting it so. Here should point straight to #50430 but it seems like I can't change that. -- cannot bind to YP server under AMD64 https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 174162] Re: cannot bind to YP server under AMD64

2008-03-19 Thread Mark Brown
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 152794 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152794 There is no reason not to use the compat mechanism for the user databases - it's more flexible. 'nis' is there to handle other cases such as those where there is no file to use (like netgroup). If you really

[Bug 174162] Re: cannot bind to YP server under AMD64

2008-03-19 Thread Martti Kuparinen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 152794 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152794 No, isn't that the "old way of doing this", I thought modifying /etc/nsswitch.conf was "the right thing to do"... -- cannot bind to YP server under AMD64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174162 You received t

[Bug 174162] Re: cannot bind to YP server under AMD64

2008-03-19 Thread Mark Brown
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 152794 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152794 Have you added the + lines to the passwd, group and shadow files? -- cannot bind to YP server under AMD64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174162 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 174162] Re: cannot bind to YP server under AMD64

2008-03-19 Thread Martti Kuparinen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 152794 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152794 With "nis" in /etc/nsswitch.conf n40:~> id martti uid=2000(martti) gid=1(tri) groups=... Without "nis" in /etc/nsswitch.conf n40:~> id martti id: martti: No such user Again with "nis" in /etc/nsswitch.

[Bug 174162] Re: cannot bind to YP server under AMD64

2008-03-19 Thread Mark Brown
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 152794 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152794 On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:21:17PM -, Martti Kuparinen wrote: > passwd: compat nis > group: compat nis > shadow: compat nis You really should use compat only. Adding NIS as well

[Bug 174162] Re: cannot bind to YP server under AMD64

2008-03-19 Thread Martti Kuparinen
I didn't have any problems on 7.10 but after performing a clean install of 32-bit 8.04 today I couldn't login as my NIS user after reboot. Here's what I did: # sudo aptitude update && sudo aptitude dist-upgrade # sudo aptitude install nis # sudo vi /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: compat nis gr

[Bug 174162] Re: cannot bind to YP server under AMD64

2008-01-28 Thread Mark Brown
** Changed in: nis (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- cannot bind to YP server under AMD64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174162 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@li

[Bug 174162] Re: cannot bind to YP server under AMD64

2008-01-27 Thread Mark Brown
I can't reproduce this here using 7.10 on an AMD64 - the device binds straight away. Your comment about playing with --no-dbus indicates that there may be some issues here with startup ordering with respect to the network interface coming up. Does this problem occur only on startup or does it also

[Bug 174162] Re: cannot bind to YP server under AMD64

2007-12-05 Thread Jonathan Grot
Forgot to mention than I have two 32 bit Intel machines with 7.10 configured just about the same way and they both work fine. -- cannot bind to YP server under AMD64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174162 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug