On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 01:52:46AM -, bugproxy wrote:
> --- Comment From gcwil...@us.ibm.com 2017-10-04 17:33 EDT---
> I have received the KEK from Emily in person.
> --- Comment From gcwil...@us.ibm.com 2017-10-04 18:16 EDT---
> BTW, I learned from Emily that Canonical plans
--- Comment From gcwil...@us.ibm.com 2017-10-04 17:33 EDT---
I have received the KEK from Emily in person.
--- Comment From gcwil...@us.ibm.com 2017-10-04 18:16 EDT---
BTW, I learned from Emily that Canonical plans to issue Power keys/certs
separately from those for the x86 UEFI s
Hi Claudio,
> --- Comment From cclau...@br.ibm.com 2017-09-27 16:47 EDT---
> (In reply to comment #30)
> > Attached is the ESL db update for Canonical's POWER SecureBoot signing key.
> > It is signed with Canonical's KEK key, which will be provided to IBM out of
> > band to ensure integrit
--- Comment From cclau...@br.ibm.com 2017-09-27 16:47 EDT---
(In reply to comment #30)
> Attached is the ESL db update for Canonical's POWER SecureBoot signing key.
> It is signed with Canonical's KEK key, which will be provided to IBM out of
> band to ensure integrity of the delivery chann
--- Comment From l...@us.ibm.com 2017-09-08 13:05 EDT---
(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > Does IBM have any feedback for us regarding the test kernel Andy provided?
> >
>
> We're planning to test this month. We'll give feedback as soon as the test
> is completed.
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 11:50:09PM -, bugproxy wrote:
> --- Comment From l...@us.ibm.com 2017-09-07 19:41 EDT---
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > Does IBM have any feedback for us regarding the test kernel Andy provided?
> We're planning to test this month. We'll give feedback as soon
--- Comment From l...@us.ibm.com 2017-09-07 19:41 EDT---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Does IBM have any feedback for us regarding the test kernel Andy provided?
>
We're planning to test this month. We'll give feedback as soon as the
test is completed. The tentative target will be Sept. 29
--- Comment From cclau...@br.ibm.com 2017-08-01 19:06 EDT---
(In reply to comment #15)
> One open technical question from the Canonical side: can you confirm that
> the POWER firmware implementation will support embedded certificate chains
> as part of the vmlinux signature data? Our exist
--- Comment From drbr...@us.ibm.com 2017-07-20 17:52 EDT---
Canonical please clarify. I was on a call with Andrew Cloke earlier today. He
said this could be done but not done in time for 17.10 GA in October. It would
happen after 17.10 GA.
--
You received this bug notification because y
--- Comment From drbr...@us.ibm.com 2017-07-20 14:16 EDT---
Canonical please clarify. I was on a call with Andrew Cloke earlier today. He
said this could be done but not done in time for 17.10 GA in October. It would
happen after 17.10 GA.
--
You received this bug notification because y
--- Comment From l...@us.ibm.com 2017-07-18 17:15 EDT---
Is there any update that you can share at the moment?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696154
Title:
[17.10 FEAT] Sign
--- Comment From l...@us.ibm.com 2017-07-13 16:51 EDT---
Hi Canonical,
Please let me know if there are any concerns on signing the the Ubuntu
kernel for the 17.10 release.
Thanks,
Vicky
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
--- Comment From l...@us.ibm.com 2017-07-10 16:49 EDT---
Hi Canonical,
Here are some clarifications on the feature from the security team:
> To clarify, this feature is only asking for a change to the Ubuntu kernel
> build
> process to produce a signed kernel and no other development. T
13 matches
Mail list logo
