Hi,
I've reported this upstream
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413106), and this is not a
bug: thin-provisioning should be used. Snapshots defined on thin-
provisioned LV's show good characteristics.
Gerben
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1413106
https://bugzilla.redhat.c
Hi,
I know what is going on: there is some kind of a replay of the snapshot
being performed when booting. This results into increasing boot times on
increasing snapshot allocation.
I've tested this with a virtual client with incremental blocks changed
on a LV which being the source of a snapshot
This probably is a snapshot issue locking up somewhere.
I've been misled in the number of lv's created for this snapshot, the
"snapshot", "-cow" and "-real" where I've misinterpreted the last as a
LV genuinely defined by me somewhere in the past.
The snapshot was readable, (did not test writing).
