But it's an improper merge, and someone should take care of fixing the
resulting bug.
** Changed in: freehdl (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Well, this particular merge is done (didn't notice it lacked the LP: ...
meta-tag to close the bug).
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freehdl/0.0.8-2.2ubuntu1
** Changed in: freehdl (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
The corresponding Debian bug for the ABI change is Debian bug #791040.
This was closed by the Debian release team on the grounds that there was
no package depending on the library in the Debian archive. There also
isn't one in Ubuntu.
It is best to revert the ABI change to match Debian, but we wi
Dropping those changes is tricky, and at the very least requires adding
a Conflict on the library package against the v5 version.
Personally I think it's easier/safer to just carry on with this; it
would have been better to do this change in Debian by means of a NMU
(the package looks unmaintained
Subscribing Steve Langasek as he was the most recent Ubuntu uploader.
** Changed in: freehdl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Quigley (tsimonq2)
** Changed in: freehdl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Attached is a debdiff keeping the delta, applicable to 0.0.8-2.1ubuntu2.
** Patch added: "2.1ubuntu2-to-2.2ubuntu1.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freehdl/+bug/1648295/+attachment/476/+files/2.1ubuntu2-to-2.2ubuntu1.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you
