[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-09-15 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #804684 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804684 ** Summary changed: - [MIR] fonts-android + libgs9-common recommends fonts-droid-fallback which isn't in main -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-09-15 Thread Michael Terry
So we don't need this? Will mark invalid. ** Changed in: fonts-android (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621210 Title: [MIR] fonts-androi

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-09-15 Thread Till Kamppeter
Uploaded. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621210 Title: [MIR] fonts-android To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-andr

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-09-15 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
http://packages.ubuntu.com/yakkety/libgs9-common I attached a patch for changing it, and after a test build I could do: $ dpkg -I libgs9-common_9.19~dfsg+1-0ubuntu3_all.deb | grep Recommends Recommends: fonts-noto-cjk ** Also affects: ghostscript (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-09-14 Thread Till Kamppeter
I do not find any Ghostscript with a depends/recommends/suggests on fonts-noto-cjk. Can someone tell me which Ghostscript version? Or can someone post a patch to switch Ghostscript to fonts-noto-cjk? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-09-14 Thread Till Kamppeter
This was simply an oversight when I tried minimize the delta between Debian and Ubuntu, letting the new Ghostscript package be based on Debian's with the only difference that the libopenjpeg shipped with Ghostscript is used and not the system's one. I can simply reapply the change to get it recomm

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-09-08 Thread Michael Terry
Yeah, I thought noto was the replacement. Unless there's a good reason android is needed, I'd prefer we standardize. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621210 Title: [MIR] fonts-android

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

2016-09-07 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
I suppose this is due to . In Ubuntu (and flavors) previous fonts-droid depends/recommends were replaced with fonts-noto-cjk in Xenial; please see . Wondering if it would be better in Ubuntu to change that libgs9-common recommend