** Tags added: cscc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1618299
Title:
IPv6 with LVS Performance issue in latest 3.13LTS kernels
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1618299
Title:
IPv6 with LVS Performance issue in latest 3.13LTS kernels
To ma
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.13.0-98.145
---
linux (3.13.0-98.145) trusty; urgency=low
* Fix GRO recursion overflow for tunneling protocols (LP: #1631287)
- tunnels: Don't apply GRO to multiple layers of encapsulation.
* CVE-2016-7039
- SAUCE: net: add recu
Thanks so much for the rapid turnaround on this report guys. I've
modified the tag to the verification-done-trusty, as requested. I
pulled down all the linux-image, source, and dbgsyms for the
3.13.0-97.144 kernel from proposed for installing/testing. I verified
the source code manually as well.
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
trusty' to 'verification-done-trusty'.
If verification is not done by 5 working days from t
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1618299
Title:
IPv6 with LVS Performance issue in latest 3.13LTS kernel
** Tags added: verified-test-kernel-works
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1618299
Title:
IPv6 with LVS Performance issue in latest 3.13LTS kernels
To manage notifications about this b
Joseph, the commits you've included appear to be correct to me. I've
tested this kernel as best I can without the dbgsym package. I really
could use that package so I could verify the performance with "perf" as
well as use "systemtap" to verify stuff is going down the right paths.
But I did use t
Thanks so much Joseph! My apologies on not seeing this earlier that you
had a test kernel ready, I was offsite almost all of last week and
swamped. Will download it now and test it later this evening or
tomorrow morning in my test rig. By any chance, so as to aid my
systemtap monitoring, do you
I built a Trusty test kernel with a cherry-pick of commit: 705f1c8.
This commit also required commit 0c3584d58 as a prereq. The test kernel
can be downloaded from:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1618299/
Can you test this kernel and see if it resolves this bug?
Thanks in advance!
--
Y
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Cha
11 matches
Mail list logo
