** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579915
Title:
network-manager 1.2 uses more power
To manage
Will we see an SRU for bug #1557026?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579915
Title:
network-manager 1.2 uses more power
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.laun
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579915
Title:
network-manager 1.2 uses more power
To manage notific
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579915
Title:
network-manager 1.2 uses more power
To manage
Two things I noticed while testing the powersave fix from silo-77:
1) On mako ( rc-proposed / 434 ), iwconfig doesn't report anything at
all for powersave. This may be a driver limitation.
2) On frieza ( rc-proposed / 101 ), the powersave period is set to 0,
which may be a less than ideal value
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
I've confirmed that the default powersave patch included in xenial is
wrong, as it patches libnm-util which is deprecated, as opposed to
patching the new libnm0.
I've update the version of NM in the silo for VPN with an updated patch
which restores WiFi powersave by default.
https://launchpad.net
Thanks Tony.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579915
Title:
network-manager 1.2 uses more power
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devi
@Amr
Thanks for the pointer. I just added a comment to bug #1557026
regarding the xenial powersave regression, and it applies to Touch as
well.
I'm working on an updated patch for Touch, and then will see about
SRU'ing for xenial as soon as possible.
--
You received this bug notification becau
Just flashed OTA10 and 'iwconfig wlan0' when associated to an AP shows:
Power Management period:2
phablet@ubuntu-phablet:~$ system-image-cli -i
current build number: 32
device name: krillin
channel: ubuntu-touch/stable/bq-aquaris.en
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
@Selene
Are the devices associated to WiFi access points when the testing is
performed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579915
Title:
network-manager 1.2 uses more power
To manage n
@Amr
Yes, this could be related to bug #1557026. I checked, and we're
including default_powersave_on.patch, however it doesn't appear to be
working properly in NM 1.1.93.
I just confirmed on krillin ( rc-proposed / 325 ) that even though the
device is associated to an AP, iwconfig show 'Power Ma
Checked this on krillin with
current build number: 329
device name: krillin
channel: ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/bq-aquaris.en
last update: 2016-05-10 03:25:03
version version: 329
version ubuntu: 20160510
version device: 20160329-a9bacdb
version custom: 20160505-975-38-9
Device doesn't go to sleep
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Simon Fels (morphis) => Tony Espy (awe)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579915
Title:
network-manager 1.2 uses more power
To ma
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Fels (morphis)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579915
Tit
Is this related Bug #1557026?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579915
Title:
network-manager 1.2 uses more power
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.n
To clarify, the failed case was the last good image plus updates to
network-manager and libnm0. Nothing else was upgraded.
The unchanged case updated nearly everything else. Here's apt's full
description:
The following packages have been kept back:
libsystemsettings1 network-manager ubuntu-sy
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579915
Title:
network-manager 1.2 uses more power
To manage notifications
** Summary changed:
- big power increase in May 4th and later builds
+ network-manager 1.2 uses more power
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579915
Title:
network-manager 1.2 uses more
20 matches
Mail list logo
