--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2017-01-11 03:36 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla -> closed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1565841
Title:
[FEAT] Provide zfcpdump-infrastruct
--- Comment From michael.holz...@de.ibm.com 2016-10-20 08:39 EDT---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Verification was successful on Yakkety/16.10!
Very cool! A big "thank you" to Canonical and our test team!
Michael
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
--- Comment From thorsten.wink...@de.ibm.com 2016-10-20 07:03 EDT---
Verification was successful on Yakkety/16.10!
0) # apt install zfcpdump-kernel
1) Adding of a SCSI/LUN device(with multipath)
2) Creating a partition on that SCSI/LUN device
3) Install the dump tool by using the "zipl -d
--- Comment From michael.holz...@de.ibm.com 2016-04-08 04:13 EDT---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Does zfcdump.image must match the crashed kernel
> image?
No, "zfcpdump.image" can be a different kernel version than the crashed
kernel.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
--- Comment From michael.holz...@de.ibm.com 2016-04-07 13:19 EDT---
(In reply to comment #12)
> > >> I believe this requires a separate kernel build in Ubuntu to function, is
> > >> that correct?
> > >
> > > It would make sense because this helps to better control the memory
> > > footprint
--- Comment From michael.holz...@de.ibm.com 2016-04-07 13:06 EDT---
(In reply to comment #12)
> /lib/s390-tools/zfcpdump/zfcpdump_part.rd
>
> is already provided.
>
> I'm not sure if that is the same as the required
> /lib/s390-tools/zfcpdump/zfcpdump.rd or not.
I would assume that it is t
--- Comment From brueck...@de.ibm.com 2016-04-05 11:02 EDT---
(In reply to comment #9)
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:09 AM, bugproxy wrote:
> > (In reply to comment #6)
> >> I believe this requires a separate kernel build in Ubuntu to function, is
> >> that correct?
> >
> > It would make sens
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:09 AM, bugproxy wrote:
> --- Comment From brueck...@de.ibm.com 2016-04-05 02:59 EDT---
> (In reply to comment #6)
>> I believe this requires a separate kernel build in Ubuntu to function, is
>> that correct?
>
> It would make sense because this helps to better cont
--- Comment From michael.holz...@de.ibm.com 2016-04-05 07:43 EDT---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > I believe this requires a separate kernel build in Ubuntu to function, is
> > that correct?
>
> It would make sense because this helps to better control the memory
> f
--- Comment From brueck...@de.ibm.com 2016-04-05 02:59 EDT---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I believe this requires a separate kernel build in Ubuntu to function, is
> that correct?
It would make sense because this helps to better control the memory
footprint. AFAIK, and Michael should correc
10 matches
Mail list logo
