> if we have to go back we can go back to 3.10 (if GTK requirement
satisfy) which trusty is using.
the feedback received and the error tracker don't confirm your
statement, the new versions until wily didn't have more noticable issues
> Why not using Nemo? As far as I know it has all the functio
What about updating Nautilus to 3.20 in Xenial?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1541954
Title:
Revert to the previous nautilus version
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
ht
Why not using Nemo? As far as I know it has all the functionality of
Nautilus 3.14 and then some.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1541954
Title:
Revert to the previous nautilus version
Here a patch to disable headerbar in nautilus 3.18:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/109637860626261571611/posts/2qvoZ3Gkuub
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1541954
Title:
Revert to the pre
This bug was fixed in the package nautilus - 1:3.18.4.is.3.14.3-0ubuntu1
---
nautilus (1:3.18.4.is.3.14.3-0ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Revert to the previous serie, the new one is going to need more work
which is not going to be done this cycle (some issues/regressions are
I simply do not welcome this decision. Are we going back to 3.14? 3.14
is even worse. Lots of crashes, bugs, absence of more critical features
(like absence of browse-network in the sidepane) etc. Upstream won't
fix those. 3.14 is basically dead.
As per issues with 3.18,
1. We can cherry pick th
