[Bug 153649] Re: sockets SIGPIPE not sent

2008-08-19 Thread LizardWizard
Here is how it goes ; there is no bug. Lately i dug again into it and i found the following: The SIGPIPE was not sent because the SO_KEEPALIVE option takes by default a huge time to become effective ( sometimes 2h or so) on a socket closed from the other side. This is TCP level-dependent and can

[Bug 153649] Re: sockets SIGPIPE not sent

2008-08-13 Thread Michael Nagel
i am closing this bug report then. but feel free to reopen it or file a new bug should you get in trouble again. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- sockets SIGPIPE not sent https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153649 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 153649] Re: sockets SIGPIPE not sent

2008-08-12 Thread LizardWizard
Sorry , this happened so long ago... I wouldn't know what package could be responsible with the "bug" if it is one. Truth is i should have maybe posted it on a programming forum rather than yours,but as far as i remember the same conditions on a bsd platform behaved ok, so this is the only reason w

[Bug 153649] Re: sockets SIGPIPE not sent

2008-08-04 Thread Michael Nagel
if you provide an affected package chances are mch higher someone will have a look at this! what package would you blame? ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplete -- sockets SIGPIPE not sent https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153649 You received this bug notification because you a