[Bug 153511] Re: ati opensource driver - no direct rendering

2007-10-21 Thread Tormod Volden
Yes, it has been discussed to make them conflicting, which they really are! But really it should have been fixed in the fglrx driver, which we can not do anything about. Just shows how dangerous and unsatisfactory it is to use proprietary software. ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)

Re: [Bug 153511] Re: ati opensource driver - no direct rendering

2007-10-20 Thread Sergey Tuchkin
Thank you, removimg fglrx proprietary driver seems to fix the problem with unresolved symbols, and I even managed to enable compiz etc. But is it normal that there are conflicting video drivers in leading desktop distribution? Maybe it is not a bad idea to set this two .deb packages as conflicting?

[Bug 153511] Re: ati opensource driver - no direct rendering

2007-10-17 Thread Tormod Volden
I guess the proprietary fglrx driver has not been completely removed. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RadeonDriver#head- 229f59879c2a2b6c6635d1e189706d97f836b879 Try: dpkg -l '*fglrx*' and locate fglrx to see if there is still some evil proprietary bits around. It looks like a mismatch be