** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
its really nice to have firefox-kde-support specially in Hardy with the
FF's ugly face there!
--
More "magic" for Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150333
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug assignee.
--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EM
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
Is part of the problem that currently there is KDE 3.x and KDE 4.x to
support? It means duplicated effort in getting KDE up to speed - and any
improvements worked over from Gnome to KDE will need to go to both
versions of the desktop (for the forseeable future). So, where do you
need most help? Thi
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
** Description changed:
GNOME had more lacks than KDE. Ubuntu's developers have solved it, and
the proof of this is that in Ubuntu's 7.10 GNOME already it is not
necessary to open a terminal to configure the system.
For it, I think that now it is the moment to offer a bit more of
cont
BulletProofX for Kubuntu.
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BulletProofX
--
More "magic" for Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150333
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
"Adept Notifier does that too"
OK.
--
"More "magic" for Kubuntu"
Related bugs:
- Bug #126579
- Bug #189828
--
More "magic" for Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150333
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug assignee.
--
kubuntu-bugs ma
Adept Notifier does that too
--
More "magic" for Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150333
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug assignee.
--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-
** Attachment added: "update-manager-restart-required-balloon.jpg"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11771059/update-manager-restart-required-balloon.jpg
--
More "magic" for Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150333
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
- adept_manager:
Ubuntu's update manager shows in the system tray a restart icon (with the
respective emergent message) when you makes an important update. adept_manager
does not show any icon or message in the system tray.
--
More "magic" for Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150333
You
Thank you for your feedback!
We (the Kubuntu developers) know that Kubuntu is behind Ubuntu. We are
trying hard to implement the best things from Ubuntu into Kubuntu, but
we are never going to be equal - we have less developers and marketing
than Ubuntu does.
On the other hand, we believe Kubuntu
Thank you for Kubuntu, it's the only O.S. that I use every day and I am
installing to my friends.
I wish the best thing you, to give the best thing us.
P.S: Excuse me for my poor English.
--
More "magic" for Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150333
You received this bug notification becau
31 matches
Mail list logo
