--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2016-05-12 05:30 EDT---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I'm sorry, but you have not addressed my question. Detection of changes is
> handled via the udev rule. The udev rule does not depend on the prior
> existence of this file; it simply does:
Ah! Tha
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2016-01-20 11:55 EDT---
Hello Canonical,
Looks like this issue is not fixed in 16.04 as well. Can you please
accept this patch ?
-Vasant
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From kamale...@in.ibm.com 2015-10-23 08:43 EDT---
Can maintainer from Canonical have a look at the response and kindly let us
know if your looking for more information to make the requested changes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
--- Comment From kamale...@in.ibm.com 2015-09-15 05:57 EDT---
*** Bug 129828 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1492895
Title:
Ubun
--- Comment From hegdevas...@in.ibm.com 2015-09-15 05:40 EDT---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Shipping a file under /var in a package is normally incorrect. In this case
> it appears that the file is only ever used as a stamp file - its contents
> never change, it's only an IPC mechanism betw
