Re: [Bug 1460794] Re: systemd does not boot with a separate /usr partition

2015-07-02 Thread Robert Hardy
I am not convinced that the cgroup issue was the only issue here, but since this is a single physical I can't easily go back in time to test further. Either way the changed summary is backwards. Once repartitioning was completed systemd fails to boot if the /dev/cgroup fstab entry IS present. Th

[Bug 1460794] Re: systemd does not boot with a separate /usr partition

2015-07-01 Thread Martin Pitt
> cgroup /dev/cgroup cgroup defaults 0 0 Erk -- that's what broke the boot after all? Indeed, this was in comment 4 already, but I missed that. So the journal should have a complaint/timeout on that, as /dev/cgroup is a thing of the distant past (google still has a few hits). Thanks for finding!

[Bug 1460794] Re: systemd does not boot with a separate /usr partition

2015-07-01 Thread Robert Hardy
I dug into this more on the server that failed to upgrade properly to see if the server would work properly after switching back to systemd. Please recall this was after a backup and restore with a much simpler partitioning scheme. It still would not boot. I ended up finding this line in my fstab:

[Bug 1460794] Re: systemd does not boot with a separate /usr partition

2015-06-11 Thread Martin Pitt
> So what I can do is to install a 14.04 system with LVM and separate /home, /tmp/, /usr, and /var, upgrade that to 14.10 and 15.04, and see if I can reproduce this. I just did that, and the upgrade worked without a hitch. So I'm afraid we still don't have a reproducer for this.. /dev/vda1 on /bo

[Bug 1460794] Re: systemd does not boot with a separate /usr partition

2015-06-11 Thread Martin Pitt
>I've been working with Linux for 20 years, I really doubt there was anything wrong with my fstab. systemd reports errors which sysvinit and upstart just ignore (i. e. silently ignoring wrong UUIDs, and just not pointing that partition, etc.). We got a lot of bug reports due to that, which is why