[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2009-03-25 Thread Scott James Remnant
The current issue with renaming after an upgrade to jaunty is being tracked as bug #329106 -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs m

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2009-03-25 Thread geb
my network card was listed as eth2, i just changed it to eth0...fix worked for me -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing li

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2009-03-21 Thread Akkana Peck
Seems to be worse in jaunty. I upgraded from hardy to intrepid with no networking difficulties, but I just upgraded the same machine from intrepid to jaunty and had no network, because udev renamed eth0 to eth1. I removed 70-persistent-net.rules and rebooted, and that fixed the problem. (See als

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2009-03-13 Thread blackest_knight
I've just experienced a similar issue on intrepid my eth0 was reported as eth8 it may be because this systems been rebuilt and moved between pc's a few times over the years and had several different network cards hopefully renaming eth8 eth0 and deleting the other entries cures the issue (it seem t

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2008-02-27 Thread tji
I realized after my previous message that this bug relates to Gutsy in general, and not just the JeOS version.. My comment was specific to the JeOS build, which operates in a fundamentally different environment as a Virtual Machine, which leads to issues with the virtual NIC devices being a lot mo

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2008-02-27 Thread tji
Aside from the busybox issue..Isn't the udev net persistence feature going to cause a lot more problems than it solves? As I understand it, it is recording the MAC address of the NIC, and associating that with an ethernet interface. So, that if the order the NICs are initialized in changes,

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-12-28 Thread Ubuntu QA Tracker
** Tags added: iso-testing -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubu

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-12-15 Thread vonHalenbach
Oh sorry! Then i did falsely dupe it. I thought they were the same issues leading to no working network. Please un-dupe 153727 then. -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-12-15 Thread Uphaar Agrawalla
Bug 153727 has been marked duplicate of this bug, and this bug is marked Invalid. The issue in 153727 is same as Nego's issue, which Steve indicates is a separate issue. The bug is very much present in Gutsy Final (with all updates). Why was 153727 marked as a duplicate of this bug then? Should I

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-22 Thread gromituk
I've had the same problem after updating a Kubuntu desktop machine to Gutsy last night. This morning, after rebooting, the single ethernet card with a static address had "disappeared". Over the telephone I confirmed that there was one "SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*"... line (don't know if it con

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-19 Thread Southernman
It is a hack work around found through google, but it solved the problem with the adapter changing on each reboot... when using a static IP. Remove all lines of various eth0, eth1, eth2 and so on and replace them with this line: SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="forcedeth", NAME="eth0" Adjust your dri

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread NEGO
Look for IRQ 16 Oct 4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [ 24.812477] PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:02.0 to 64 Oct 4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [ 24.812480] ohci_hcd :00:02.0: OHCI Host Controller Oct 4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [ 24.812677] ohci_hcd :00:02.0: new USB bus r

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread NEGO
Good I show the information of my file here 70-persistent-net.rules # This cases out was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules # program, probably run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules cases out. # # You dog modify it, ace long ace you keep each rule on to single line

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread NEGO
First, I request excuses by the badly English. It is translation of google. The problem in my case related to the connection of the network devices, is that in each resumption the card that this connected changes its name. the file 70-persistent-net.rules adds a 1 to him to the name This implies

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread Brian Murray
Jan - This bug's state is one of Fix Released meaning that the bug is fixed and that you should not see it on a daily build of the server ISO images nor on the RC image when it comes out. -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382 You received this bug notifi

Re: [Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:35:51PM -, Jan Kunder wrote: > NEGO: > Pls escribe en inglés (básico es bastante:) > Si no hablar inglés ningún pequeño pedacito: > Escribirlo en español (como) > uso: http://www.google.com/translate_t?langpair=es |en > y GOMA del copy en IGUAL comenta. Agradece:) I'

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread Jan Kunder
Workaround/HINT:: 1. comment EVERYTHING in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules 2. add: ## PCI device ONBOARD intel 10/100 SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:bb:05:14:85:56", NAME="eth0" # PCI device 0x8086:0x1229 (e100) SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:a

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread Jan Kunder
Hi. I vote this to be nominated for RC(!) Gutsy release. This is very dangerous, annoying 95% (or more) of installer, and I think&hope - easy to repair. It IS working on other distros: feisty, Etch, Sarge, FC5+6+7 ... Thanks much anyone. -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.lau

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread Jan Kunder
HASAN:: IMHO yes:: delete "your lines". And add these: ## PCI device ONBOARD intel 10/100 SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:bb:05:14:85:56", NAME="eth0" # PCI device 0x8086:0x1229 (e100) SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:a0:cc:d0:00:43", NAME="eth1" ##xyz b

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread Jan Kunder
NEGO: Pls write in English (basic is enough :) If do NOT speak english any little bit: Write it in Spanish (as you did) use: http://www.google.com/translate_t?langpair=es|en and COPY PASTE it in the SAME comment. Thanks :) ** NEGO: Pls escribe en inglés (básico es bastante:) Si no hablar i

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-09 Thread Vinicius
I can confirm this bug in Gutsy 7.10 server beta when installing it in a VmWare virtual machine running over a GSX server. -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-06 Thread hasan
What does this section of /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules do? = SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0" SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0" SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0" SUBSYSTEM=="ne

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-04 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu) Target: ubuntu-7.10-rc => None -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-02 Thread Steve Langasek
fixed in busybox, marking as invalid for udev. The last followup in Spanish seems to report an unrelated bug, since it states that it affects desktop installs and happens after each reboot, not just at install time. ** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- [Gutsy] bro

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-02 Thread NEGO
Bueno yo de ingles nada pero la compilacion del 1 de octubre y este error se viene arrastrando desde el beta 5 No solo para la version server tambien para la version Desktop. Al reiniciar el sistema reasigna nombre del dispositivo de red. Esto implica tener que correr el pppoeconf para conectarse

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-02 Thread Colin Watson
busybox (1:1.1.3-5ubuntu5) gutsy; urgency=low * Move test and friends to /bin (LP: #145382). -- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:52:41 +0100 ** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-02 Thread Colin Watson
Apparently I misunderstood and the problem is that [ is in /usr/bin. Reopening busybox task. ** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-01 Thread Jan Kunder
I can confirm the bug. It happend 28.09.07 10:18 GMT. On my "new" P233MMX proxy and (SJ36=MM) 1GHz Celeron+256MB + i815E + onboard_100Mbit + intelPCI_100Mbit. I was lucky I was nearby all of the machines. I landed with Gutsy.beta1 on both of them without any ethX (respectively with eth2+eth3) (et

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-01 Thread Colin Watson
Scott, I'm not going to build [ into busybox's /bin/sh (there's no support for this in busybox at the moment and the one relevant configuration option is far too invasive for this - it affects all busybox applets). Please change udev-udeb to use a full PATH rather than just /lib/udev. ** Changed i

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-30 Thread celil
Thanks Jim, the patch for /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules fixed the problem for me. I used the alternate CD to install a command based distribution on an old computer. -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382 You received this bug notification b

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-30 Thread Jim Tarvid
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# diff /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules 70-persistent-net.rules 13c13 < SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:16:ec:6e:e1:fd", NAME="eth0" --- > SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:16:ec:6e:e1:fd", > NAME="eth1" and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-29 Thread Jim Tarvid
I can confirm this happens on a gutsy server beta install here. SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0" SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0" SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0" SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", A

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-28 Thread Scott James Remnant
This is caused by the installer's busybox /bin/sh not having the [ built-in, so the write_net_rules shell script doesn't actually work properly ** Also affects: busybox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-27 Thread Timo Aaltonen
We use static network settings, and after installation the 70 -persistent-net.rules has seven lines like this: SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0" and no line with a MAC-address. The computer only has one interface. If I remove those lines, the network is brought up o

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-26 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High Target: None => ubuntu-7.10-rc -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-26 Thread Stéphane Graber
Lars Wirzenius had a similar issue with Ubuntu Alternate. Described as comment here : https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/134496 -- [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382 You received this bug notification because you are a m