I find that I get crashes until ~/.nedit is populated. I've gotten in
the habit of copying that directory from a working system when
installing a new one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
There are still many crashes being reported in the Error Tracker
regarding this:
https://errors.ubuntu.com/bucket/?id=/usr/bin/nedit%3A11%3Ainitialize%3ACallInitialize%3AxtCreate%3A_XtCreateWidget%3A_XtVaCreateWidget
It seems to be currently affecting Wily and Xenial.
--
You received this bug n
Did I even mentioned I reported this upstream and that a patch is available
there?
https://sourceforge.net/p/nedit/git/ci/1a441b957a7f37bb9ab7ae15fefd3f41d59b3da4/
Probably should go into the packaging soon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug was fixed in the package nedit - 1:5.6-1ubuntu1
---
nedit (1:5.6-1ubuntu1) vivid; urgency=medium
* Add Recommends on xfonts-{100,75}dpi* to work around
crash on startup on Ubuntu systems (LP: #1415309)
-- Graham InggsTue, 14 Apr 2015 16:26:05 +0200
** Changed in:
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/vivid-proposed/nedit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1415309
Title:
"Open file with Nedit" from PCManFM causes Nedit to crash
To manage notifications about
> Doesn't it make more sense to do this in Motif as you mentioned
earlier?
I have tried running just about every Motif package on Vivid without
xfonts-75dpi and xfonts-100dpi installed.
Some of them do appear a little different, but none of them segfault.
This looks like a bug in NEdit to me, bu
> Paul, shall I just upload NEdit with the added Recommends line to Ubuntu
> for now?
Doesn't it make more sense to do this in Motif as you mentioned earlier?
If not, fixing this in Ubuntu only for now is fine of course, but fixing
it via Debian (although it is not strictly needed there) is fine w
So this looks like it is an Ubuntu-specific problem.
In Debian, xorg depends on:
xfonts-base (>= 1:1.0.0-1),
xfonts-100dpi (>= 1:1.0.0-1),
xfonts-75dpi (>= 1:1.0.0-1),
xfonts-scalable (>= 1:1.0.0-1),
This was changed in Ubuntu some time ago:
xorg (1:7.5+6ubuntu7) natty; urgency=low
* debi
> I have no idea. Why do you think that would make sense, is it because
> motif now has XFT support?
Possibly because Motif now has XFT support, and possibly it should
always have been there.
> I was about to work on the updated NEdit
> package, do you want me to wait?
Yes, please wait. We stil
On 12-04-15 16:19, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Should we rather be adding the
> Recommends: xfonts-100dpi | xfonts-75dpi | xfonts-100dpi-transcoded |
> xfonts-75dpi-transcoded
> line to libxm4 ?
I have no idea. Why do you think that would make sense, is it because
motif now has XFT support? I was about
Paul, just a quick thought.
Should we rather be adding the
Recommends: xfonts-100dpi | xfonts-75dpi | xfonts-100dpi-transcoded |
xfonts-75dpi-transcoded
line to libxm4 ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
Thanks Paul.
If I understand policy correctly, that must be a Recommends, not a Depends:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-customized-programs.html#s11.8.5
There's also a Linitan error: package-depends-on-an-x-font-package.
I agree that NEdit should be made more robust against the situa
Hi Graham and Maven,
Given the fact that your testing showed that having the latest NEdit
version doesn't help this specific issue, I tend to only go for the
solution that Graham suggested: the depends/recommends field.
I'll try to prepare an upload, but may not get around it today. Monday
or Tue
@Graham,
I've installed nedit from the ppa but doesnt work
$ sudo apt-get install nedit
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des dépendances
Lecture des informations d'état... Fait
Paquets suggérés :
csh
Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront installés :
nedit
0
5.6a still segfaults for me without any of the xfonts-* packages installed.
Do you know what else is new in 5.6a? ChangeLog and ReleaseNotes seem to be
out of date.
If you are happy to add the Recommends line to 5.6.1 and upload to
Experimental, I will sync that into Ubuntu.
It will be good to
Maven or Dave,
Could you please test the NEdit package from my PPA [1] once it is
published (shouldn't take long, they are already built)?
[1] https://launchpad.net/~paul-climbing/+archive/ubuntu/testing-area
Paul
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
On 11-04-15 21:43, Graham Inggs wrote:
> So another solution might be for nedit to recommend those fonts, as is done
> in grace (which is the package I happened to have installed on Vivid):
> Recommends: xfonts-100dpi | xfonts-75dpi | xfonts-100dpi-transcoded |
> xfonts-75dpi-transcoded
Graham,
I was able to reproduce the problem by uninstalling xfonts-75dpi and
xfonts-100dpi.
So another solution might be for nedit to recommend those fonts, as is done in
grace (which is the package I happened to have installed on Vivid):
Recommends: xfonts-100dpi | xfonts-75dpi | xfonts-100dpi-transcode
> And the code goes on to declare some variables, although I don't think
> they are used (there is a check for USE_XFT==1 and I don't see it set
> anywhere).
Well, compiling with USE_XFT=0 gives me indeed the fonts as they looked
before, so I start to believe that the setup of Maven is really usin
So my Vivid install is fairly clean, it was installed from the
ubuntu-15.04-beta2-desktop-amd64.iso image about a week ago.
I attach the output of 'dpkg -l "*font*" | grep ii', is it very
different to what you have?
** Attachment added: "vivid-fonts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou
For me this segfaults:
$ nedit -xrm '*textFontList: -*-dina-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-*-*'
Erreur de segmentation (core dumped)
but this doesnt:
$ nedit -xrm '*font: -*-dina-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-*-*'
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
On 11-04-15 11:25, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Interesting that you mention fonts. When I opened Nedit in Vivid I
> noticed the fonts were very different to what they were in Utopic.
> Compare the screenshots attached.
Well, between 5.6~cvs20081118-9 and 5.6-1 not much changed except
some small stu
Interesting that you mention fonts. When I opened Nedit in Vivid I
noticed the fonts were very different to what they were in Utopic.
Compare the screenshots attached.
** Attachment added: "Nedit Utopic Fonts"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nedit/+bug/1415309/+attachment/4372257/+f
** Attachment added: "Nedit Vivid Fonts"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nedit/+bug/1415309/+attachment/4372260/+files/nedit-vivid.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141530
Line 781 in text.c tries to do something with a font parameter. I must
admit I don't know how to change that on the top of my head, but could
you try to change the default font (or the font for nedit) before
starting it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: nedit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1415309
Title:
"Ope
I don't see any private information here, marking as public.
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1415309
Title:
"Open file with Nedit" f
27 matches
Mail list logo
