** Changed in: pstoedit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411907
Title:
Missing build dependencies
To manage notifications about this bug go
On 01/27/2017 04:51 AM, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> I just packaged libemf 1.0.9 (starting with your packaging) and uploaded
> to Debian. It is in the new queue now. Once it is accepted into testing
> I'll upload a version of pstoedit linked to it --- the appropriate
> dependency is already commi
I just packaged libemf 1.0.9 (starting with your packaging) and uploaded
to Debian. It is in the new queue now. Once it is accepted into testing
I'll upload a version of pstoedit linked to it --- the appropriate
dependency is already committed to the pstoedit packaging repo.
But I'm not going to l
> Perhaps you didn't install the corresponding version of the support
library package?
That was it! I did a quick "pstoedit -f pptx myfile.pdf myfile.pptx"
test for some PDF file I had sitting around, loaded the result into
LibreOffice, and it looked correct. (Okay, there was a tiny glitch, but
Okay, I just did "git pbuilder update; git pbuilder login" to get into
an unstable chroot, "apt install pstoedit" to install it, and ...
root@tarsk:/# pstoedit -help | egrep ppt
pstoedit: version 3.70 / DLL interface 108 (built: Oct 11 2016 - release build
- g++ 6.2.0 20161010 - 64-bit) : Copyrig
$ dpkg --status pstoedit | egrep Version:
Version: 3.70-3
$ apt-cache policy pstoedit
pstoedit:
Installed: 3.70-3
Candidate: 3.70-3
Version table:
*** 3.70-3 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
3.70-1ubuntu2 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 Pack
> I just downloaded this from
https://packages.debian.org/unstable/graphics/pstoedit -- is that the
right source?
Not sure.
This command:
$ dpkg --status pstoedit | egrep Version:
Version: 3.62-2+b1
should give 3.70-3 unlike on the machine I'm browsing on. And this:
$ apt-cache policy pstoedit
> I have just taken over the pstoedit Debian package.
Cool. Thanks for volunteering.
> The above patches seem sensible, and I'd like to include them.
Great!
> Debian does have libzip-dev but not libming-dev.
> Should I also package the latter?
> Ditto with libemf-dev.
Yes. Ubuntu provides a
Just uploaded version with pptx support enabled, 3.70-3.
If anyone tests it, I'd appreciate that, since I don't use pptx files.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411907
Title:
Missing b
I have just taken over the pstoedit Debian package.
The above patches seem sensible, and I'd like to include them.
Debian does have libzip-dev but not libming-dev.
Should I also package the latter?
Ditto with libemf-dev.
(Would also welcome regular enhancements/fixes to
github.com/barak/pstoedit
10 matches
Mail list logo
