[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2007-09-11 Thread Matthew Garrett
No, for modern CPUs the power difference between being idle and executing instructions is greater than the amount saved by reducing the frequency of the processor. It generally makes sense to run as fast as possible in order to return to idle faster. -- Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor https://bug

[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2007-09-10 Thread teedog
I've heard a lot of reports of horrid battery life in Ubuntu compared to Windows XP. Isn't defaulting to "ondemand" when unplugged the issue? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the default settings in Windows XP are "ondemand" when on AC and "powersave" when unplugged. "ondemand" is extremely

[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2007-03-23 Thread Paul Sladen
Loom: yup, I think there's a bug somewhere for "move the initscript currently in 'powernowd' to a new package with a proper /etc/default/foo" configuration. Could you open a new bug for that if you can't find it. -- Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor https://launchpad.net/bugs/13610 -- ubuntu-bug

[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor [but not always]

2007-03-23 Thread Loom
I just got aware that powernowd isn't used anymore. I always used '-m 2' like Kai and would prefer 'conservative' governor. But the only way to change it, is to edit the init-script. That's not a big issue but it's not the clean way. I would prefer to set an option in /etc/default/powernowd to sele

[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2006-10-24 Thread Paul Sladen
powernowd (0.97-1ubuntu5) edgy; urgency=low * Use ondemand if possible * Switch back to performance if powernowd is stopped -- Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:13:11 +0100 ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: gnome-power-manager => powernow

[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2006-09-11 Thread Matthew Garrett
We now use ondemand on hardware that supports it. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released -- Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor https://launchpad.net/bugs/13610 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2006-09-11 Thread Richard Hughes
Support for cpufreq scaling is present in g-p-m CVS head. -- Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor https://launchpad.net/bugs/13610 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2006-08-17 Thread Richard Hughes
Now this is happening in the HAL layer thanks to Holger Macht, this is something that will be configurable in gnome-power-manager really soon. Watch my blog for progress. -- Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor https://launchpad.net/bugs/13610 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com