Could this be ported to hardy-backports please?
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
Indeed, When I looked, there were failed to build logs. I'll be quiet
now.
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
the build logs are public and webkit has been promoted several hours
before you added your comment
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
I can only assume that WebKit will be moving to main, otherwise, Ephy
won't build now.
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
This bug was fixed in the package epiphany-browser - 2.22.3-1ubuntu1
---
epiphany-browser (2.22.3-1ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low
* Sync on Debian
* the webkit backend is built now (lp: #131944)
* debian/control.in:
- updated maintainer information
- updated to the ubun
Webkit will be the official backend in Epiphany for GNOME 2.24:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2008-April/msg0.html
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
> epiphany-webkit is not really usuable yet, why do you want a build? if
you want to debug it you should better try to build directly the svn
version
When i can't evaluate it, i can't say it. Epiphany is released as
Experimental Backend... no word about usability. Some posts above there
was writte
I tried to build a package, but it didn't work. I instead just compile
both WebKit and Epiphany from SVN.
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
epiphany-webkit is not really usuable yet, why do you want a build? if
you want to debug it you should better try to build directly the svn
version
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
When you can't/won't build it officially, can you make a epiphany-webkit
ppa build for hardy please?!
https://launchpad.net/~bruce89/+archive has only epiphany-gecko!
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:23:56PM -, Bruce Cowan wrote:
> It's not a question of stablility, WebKit would have to be in main for
> Epiphany to be able to built with it. WebKit is not a candidate for main
> yet, and probably won't be until KDE start requiring it for KDE 4.1.
Ah, sorry. Thanks
It's not a question of stablility, WebKit would have to be in main for
Epiphany to be able to built with it. WebKit is not a candidate for main
yet, and probably won't be until KDE start requiring it for KDE 4.1.
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You rec
Is the webkit backend stabler in 2.22? If so, perhaps the decision not
to package it should be reconsidered.
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Requiring that the build depends of main software are in main is a
choice and not a bug, it should be possible to build supported package
using only supported components
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are
The patch 98_xulrunner1.9.patch breaks the WebKit build at "configure:
error: conditional "HAVE_GECKO_XPCOM_GLUE" was never defined."
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is t
So, is the issue epiphany-browser's source package being in main,
meaning that it can't build-depend on things outside of main? If that's
the case, this seems to be a deficiency in the build system.
For instance, the xscreensaver source package produces 5 binaries, some
of which are in universe. H
epiphany-browser (2.20.2-1ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* The webkit variant is not built for now since it's not juged good enough
to compete with the gecko one yet and not worth promoting webkit.
The package could be maintained to universe as a different source for now.
--
[wishlist] Bu
I'm trying to package 2.20.2, which requires me to run autoreconf to
update 99_autoreconf.patch, which ends in "embed/Makefile.am: required
file `./compile' not found".
Any advice would be much appreciated.
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received
Indeed, it is only for testing purposes. The back and forward buttons
don't work, extensions and plugins don't work (I'll look into
extensions), and scrolling is a bit odd.
https://launchpad.net/~bruce89/+archive
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You re
This version is rather buggy and I would not encourage users to run it
yet
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
I've made a package based on Debian's version, it will be in my PPA if
I'm ever accepted into the beta testers team.
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact fo
Incidentally, Debian's Epiphany package has a WebKit version available :
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/e/epiphany-
browser/current/changelog
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
i think we should use epiphany with webkit as defaultbrowser, too :D
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
I think that in a near future Epiphany with webkit support should be the
default ubuntu browser and webkit should be default in gnome/gtk
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Fair enough.
I'll see what I can do with the situation.
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
the epiphany-browser source is to main, do you suggest duplicating the
source package to have a webkit variant to universe? The distro team is
not going to work on that, if you are wanting to taking responsability
to update the duplicate source and deal with the bug let we know though
--
[wishlis
Of course the firefox-granparadiso package is totally different as it is
Firefox.
What is being suggested is a new package called epiphany-webkit or
something like that which is in universe.
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notifi
no, webkit is to universe and would need to be supported to build
epiphany with it which we don't intend to do this cycle, the epiphany
code is still not really stable anyway and there is no real interest for
users
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You r
Cool. Then yeah, epiphany-webkit definitely deserves its own package.
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:33 +, Will Farrington wrote:
> Where are these packages located at? Upstream at Debian?
>
> I most definitely do not see any WebKit package listed in Gutsy's
> repositories at the moment.
>
http://packages.ubuntu.com/gutsy/source/webkit
--
Bruce Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECT
Where are these packages located at? Upstream at Debian?
I most definitely do not see any WebKit package listed in Gutsy's
repositories at the moment.
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Webkit is packaged now, and I having a seperate epiphany-webkit package
would make sense.
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Thank your for your bug. Webkit is not packaged yet and the backend is
something under work and not stable enough to be distributed
** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs
Status: New => Triaged
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
http
** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
[wishlist] Build in WebKit support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
34 matches
Mail list logo
