[Bug 131503] Re: Hash Sum mismatch

2008-08-31 Thread Zooko O'Whielacronx
For what it is worth, last October (2007-10) I started writing my own Python wrappers around the excellent Crypto++ library -- http://cryptopp.com . The resulting Python module -- http://allmydata.org/trac/pycryptopp -- does only what I need it to do for the Tahoe Least-Authority Filesystem projec

[Bug 131503] Re: Hash Sum mismatch

2008-06-16 Thread Dwayne Litzenberger
I am going to maintain PyCrypto. There are a lot of changes I want to make---like deprecating RandomPool, since too many people misuse it, and I want to set up a mailing list and a new website---so it'll take me a while to make a release, but I'm up to the task. -- Hash Sum mismatch https://bugs

[Bug 131503] Re: Hash Sum mismatch

2007-10-29 Thread Zooko O'Whielacronx
Okay, I've learned that there is another bug in the sha-256 implementation in pycrypto: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1740198&group_id=20937&atid=120937 This bug report, along with patch that fixes it (below) and instructions for how to test the bug and the fix have bee

[Bug 131503] Re: Hash Sum mismatch

2007-10-28 Thread Zooko O'Whielacronx
This sounds like a bug that was fixed in pycrypto in June of 2005: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=120937&aid=1154530&group_id=20937 The fixed version was released in, if I recall correctly, pycrypto 2.0.1, which is also the last release of pycrypto. So was the problem encounte

[Bug 131503] Re: Hash Sum mismatch

2007-08-23 Thread Celso Providelo
** Changed in: soyuz Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- Hash Sum mismatch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:

[Bug 131503] Re: Hash Sum mismatch

2007-08-14 Thread Celso Providelo
RF 4707 ** Changed in: soyuz (upstream) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- Hash Sum mismatch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@list

[Bug 131503] Re: Hash Sum mismatch

2007-08-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: python-crypto (upstream) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Hash Sum mismatch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lis

[Bug 131503] Re: Hash Sum mismatch

2007-08-10 Thread Adam Conrad
Perhaps worth noting in the comment block that "hashlib" in python2.5 and higher has a working sha256 implementation, so if using python-apt annoys you, we can switch to hashlib once drescher moves from dapper to something more modern. -- Hash Sum mismatch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131503 Y

[Bug 131503] Re: Hash Sum mismatch

2007-08-10 Thread Celso Providelo
** Changed in: soyuz (upstream) Importance: Undecided => Critical Assignee: (unassigned) => Celso Providelo Status: New => In Progress Target: None => 1.1.8 -- Hash Sum mismatch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131503 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 131503] Re: Hash Sum mismatch

2007-08-10 Thread Adam Conrad
A (tested) patch that addresses this issue is available for review at drescher:~adconrad/publishing.diff -- Hash Sum mismatch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing l

[Bug 131503] Re: Hash Sum mismatch

2007-08-10 Thread Adam Conrad
The archive issue has now been resolved, so closing the update-manager task. This still needs to be fixed in soyuz rockefuel, leaving that task open. ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Visibility changed to: Private ** Visibility changed to: Publi

[Bug 131503] Re: Hash Sum mismatch

2007-08-10 Thread Michael Vogt
I believe that this hashsum mismatch is due to a bug in the used sha256 algorithm that generates the release file. Attached is a testcase to verify this theory. ** Also affects: soyuz (upstream) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Unde