This bug was fixed in the package partman-efi - 62ubuntu1
---
partman-efi (62ubuntu1) vivid; urgency=medium
* Resynchronise with Debian. Remaining changes:
- Remove efi-modules dependency; it seems to be built into Ubuntu
kernels now.
- Require partman-base >= 129 to
** Changed in: partman-efi (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283493
Title:
Name "EFI boot partition" is non-standard
To manage notifications
** Branch linked: lp:debian/partman-efi
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283493
Title:
Name "EFI boot partition" is non-standard
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
** Changed in: partman-efi (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283493
Title:
Name "EFI boot partition" is non-standard
To manage notifi
** Changed in: partman-efi (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283493
Title:
Name "EFI boot partition" is non-standard
To manage notifications
** Changed in: partman-efi (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283493
Title:
Name "EFI boot partition" is non-standard
To manage notifications abou
** Changed in: partman-efi (Debian)
Importance: Undecided => Unknown
** Changed in: partman-efi (Debian)
Status: New => Unknown
** Changed in: partman-efi (Debian)
Remote watch: None => Debian Bug tracker #739824
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
It's referred to as an "EFI System Partition" (or sometimes a "UEFI
System Partition") in the EFI spec, so IMHO that's the name that should
be used when referring to it in any "official" way within Ubuntu.
Although there are, AFAIK, no other EFI partitions, IMHO it's important
to use the name as it
The strings come from debian / partman-efi (see below). Most of our
translations come from Debian, and it would reduce amount of
translations we have if we diverge from debian on this one. All
references are attached below. Can you please open a bug report in
debian against partman-efi package with
Are there "non-system" EFI partitions? in that case /system/ is
redundant. What do you think about just using "EFI partition" ?
afterall, it's something meant for UEFI firmware to look for and execute
- which might be a bootloader, firmware upgrader tools, or shell, or efi
games =)))
--
You recei
10 matches
Mail list logo
