Indeed it was fixed by the admin backend that landed some cycles ago
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
As described by Bruno Nova, this is already possible with the nautilus-
admin package, and by prepending the file path with `admin://`. I think
this issue should be closed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https:
** Changed in: nautilus
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
Title:
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
To manage notifications abo
For those interested, I created a simple Nautilus extension that adds
"Open as Administrator" and "Edit as Administrator" entries to the
context menu.
It's in the official Ubuntu and Debian repositories.
Just enable the "backports" repository and install the "nautilus-admin" package.
Of course, t
This feature would be very nice.
But Ubuntu should at least offer an option in the file manager(s) to "open as
root" like some other distros (plus a warning somewhere in the window that it's
dangerous, like Thunar and Mousepad do when running as root).
Right now, accessing/editing system files r
In other words, yes, it's kind of sad this feature isn't in yet, but
this isn't the right place to comment. See the GNOME link at the top.
Just keep in mind these forums are made up of volunteers.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
This is a very difficult issue because it amounts to a fairly major
feature change underneath. Every access has to be wrapped by a
permissions check, followed by an authentication. Someone tried to patch
this into the file manager a while back, but the patch never got
approved.
The real bug is the
This one has always irritated the heck out of me, because I often don't
know in advance of starting Nautilus that I'm going to want to change
something in a root-owned file. But I've been resigned to it because I
imagined there was some insuperable difficulty in implementing it. And
when my stude
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
Title:
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
To manage notifications
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Milestone: papercuts-nautilus => papercuts-s-nautilus
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
Title:
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
To
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Milestone: None => papercuts-nautilus
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Milestone: papercuts-nautilus => None
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Milestone: None => papercuts-nautilus
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
Title:
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
To manage notifications abou
there are many possible ways to fix this, some obviously easier than
others. I'm going to target this for a paper cut milestone for the time
being so we can keep track of it, and forward it to the upstream
Nautilus devs later and see what they think.
I think a simple solution would be to add an op
To those Linux developers every issue seems complex and Ubuntu (and
Linux in general) is full of usability issues which exist for as long as
Linux exists.
I just stopped using this crap. Everyone should do that. Stop using
Linux on the desktop and stop the development, because Linux on the
desktop
The issue seems complex, but I'm going to promote this to the One
Hundred Papercuts project to try refocus the problem, since its a valid
usability issue, and a very old one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
http
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
Title:
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
To manage noti
** Changed in: nautilus
Importance: Unknown => Wishlist
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
Thanks for the update Jacob, sounds like something might happen at some
point. ;-)
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Hey guys,
This bug is linked to other "upstream" bug reports, which means Ubuntu
has (rightly) passed this onto the developers of Nautilus. Once it's
implemented upstream, Ubuntu will include it in a new release, and other
distributions will get this new feature in their new releases as well.
It'
I can't believe this hasn't been implemented yet. Are we trying to keep
Linux as an Operating System for 'geeks' only?!
Changing permissions isn't exactly the most basic of Linux commands; and
going to the command prompt might be the first idea that comes to many
Linux users minds, but how about t
Gosh, it's been five years and still hasn'[t been fixed. I suggest the
same way Finder has done it: prompt for password when trying to do
something requiring root.
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a m
I personally prefer the popup menu, but I see no reason not to have both
methods. The button is certainly sensible for single file cases.
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
What do you think of an ‘Unlock button’ like the one of the time-admin
app ?
The user open the permissions dialog. There is already a message “You
are not the owner, so you cannot change these permissions.”. An ‘Unlock’
button give him the ability to bypass its user privileges to perform
permissio
Even if Canonical integrates it in Ubuntu default apps?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 02:33, njh wrote:
> That's very nice, but it's not something my aunt will be able to do.
>
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, robin0800 wrote:
>
> > You can add "sudo aptitude install nautilus-gksu" in a terminal and you
> > get a
That's very nice, but it's not something my aunt will be able to do.
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, robin0800 wrote:
> You can add "sudo aptitude install nautilus-gksu" in a terminal and you
> get an open as administrator on a right click on any folder or file in
> nautilus now.
>
> --
> Nautilus should ha
You can add "sudo aptitude install nautilus-gksu" in a terminal and you
get an open as administrator on a right click on any folder or file in
nautilus now.
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
There's a brainstorm idea about this:
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/21666/
PLEASE fix this issue: I think it's a big annoyance for new users.
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
psylem: that may be so. BUT This bug was filed because it's an usability
issue. That doesn't go away with nautilus-gksu. You can't expect the
user to know of the package. It's not installed by default. Let's say
you'd have to install a package to copy a file. Not a good workflow.
Now if it were in
Dudes, open synaptic and search for nautilus gksu. The first package on
the list named, low and behold, "nautilus-gksu" gives you a context menu
entry "Open as administrator" on any folder you may desire root access
to.
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215
Same thing is discussed here: #389422
Is it a duplicate?
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
... to get the link working: bug #389422
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://list
I have personally heard people complain about this. Running nautilus in
super user mode is bad, but whenever a user wants to perform a forbidden
operation he should have the option of typing the root password (after
seeing a proper warning).
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.l
Another use case:
- you bought a new harddrive/usbstick
- you created partitions and formated them with ext*
- you fire up nautlius to start using them and sure enough, they appear in the
places bar.
- you click to mount them
- now you try to copy files to them
BUT
they are owned by root and yo
Slightly off topic
KDE has a hidden root konqueror (file manager) and a root terminal also hidden
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bu
"gksu nautilus"
but, i still agree that, if you try to mess with a file that u dont have
priveleges 4, it should say something like, "This action requires root
athority" or something like that, and then maybe a "details" thingy that
says what kind of file operation it is (i.e. move /blah/thingy.fo
** Changed in: nautilus
Status: Unknown => Confirmed
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
** Changed in: nautilus
Bugwatch: GNOME Bug Tracker #65058 => GNOME Bug Tracker #490200
Status: Invalid => Unknown
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a dire
** Changed in: nautilus
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
Isn't there a package which installs advanced nautilus scripts (I did it
through Automatix). Once installed, you can right click within the
nautilus window and there is an option "Scripts > root-nautilus-here".
Then you can do some of the tasks which require you to be a sudo or a
root user. I have
Open a terminal window
cd /home/user/.Trash
sudo rm -r *.*
The super user passwd is required
The end!
Bye
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
looks like it is being worked on
http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2007/11/23/file-operations-in-nautilus-gio-
and-adventures-in-the-land-of-policykit/
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Something along the lines of nautilus's gio branch would be interesting.
The work on this branch means you can open a file from a GVFS recognised
place in any program and save the file even though that program doesn't
use GVFS.
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Sarah,
What about when you are working with file operations on protected files
? Nautilus doesn't ask the password. That is what this bug is about.
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I don't see why this would need to be done in nautilus, per se. Why not
let me open the file as read only, then when it asks me if i want to
save (in gedit, vim, etc), say "to save this file, you need root
privileges" or something, and give the standard password prompt (with
grey screen) that the
This problem floated up again in the Hardy Heron Expectations thread
(http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579394&page=45)
-Something- definitely needs to be done, as the current state is just a
pain in the behind without the use of third-party nautilus scripts.
--
Nautilus should have a sup
Ideas on a GUI would be nice. A "deleted items" type banner would be
ridiculous.
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
Dirk,
As long as the feature get's implemented, it's alright.
But I think that it's nice to at least say a simple phrase about what is
going on and why the hell that password box showed up most newbies
won't know why they have to type in a password, and might even think
it's a virus or someth
Agreed.
Nautilus should have a supermode that doesn't require you to go to
terminal and type in gksudo nautilus. When doing something that requires
permission, it should just ask you for password and allow you to
continue.
Using Nautilus in superuser mode is used too often - even by newbies -
to
Another idea is, when the user tries to write to protected folders, it
says something like :
"This(these) is(are) system folder(s or files), and it(they) has(have)
been protected to ensure that your computer will operate safely. Do you
wish to write to this folder anyways ? "
[Cancel]
[Yes (fiel
This would be rather obtrusive IMHO to display this in all non-writable
folders.
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
Agreed, will it be implemented? That is question!
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
htt
Siegfried, that's a nice idea!! I liked it.
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
Siefried, that's a nice idea!! I liked it.
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12154
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://li
What's about displaying a horizontal bar like that one on the Trash when
you navigate to a folder where you don't have permissions to create new
files, with a button that would allow you to switch it into "root mode"
on that window (introducing the password into a prompt if it wasn't used
recently,
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Sebastien Bacher => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://launchpad.net/bugs/12154
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Here's the post I made before I knew this bug had been submitted:
http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=1544222#
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://launchpad.net/bugs/12154
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/u
I think this is a great idea. Actually until I was linked here I
thought it was my idea. Think about it... If you are editing,
deleting, or executing a file that is owned by root and you do not have
proper permission for your action then you have two options:
#1: gksudo nautilus (nautilus with
** Bug 59415 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://launchpad.net/bugs/12154
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Bug 53592 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://launchpad.net/bugs/12154
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: nautilus (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
Nautilus should have a superuser mode
https://launchpad.net/bugs/12154
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
61 matches
Mail list logo
