This bug was fixed in the package liferea - 1.10.8-1ubuntu1
---
liferea (1.10.8-1ubuntu1) utopic; urgency=low
* Merge from Debian unstable (LP: #1208776). Remaining changes:
+ debian/patches/ubuntu-example-feeds.patch.
+ debian/patches/port-to-messaging-menu.patch.
+ deb
Looks good, thanks! Uploaded. And I agree that pretty much all the
changes are rather Ubuntu specific, so I don't think we can get much of
them to Debian without inflicting unnecessary extra maintenance pain on
Debian.
** Changed in: liferea (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You re
(forgot that the standard work-flow require these changes...)
** Changed in: liferea (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => New
** Changed in: liferea (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 29-04-14 21:13, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> Anyway, I don't like too much putting ubuntu-specific diffs in a
>> debian package that can't be built without further edits.
>
> I don't know if I understand what you mean here. Of course, if a patch
On 29-04-14 21:13, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Anyway, I don't like too much putting ubuntu-specific diffs in a
> debian package that can't be built without further edits.
I don't know if I understand what you mean here. Of course, if a patch
is unmaintainable in Debian, it also doesn't make much sens
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Ok. But having only a U/D delta in d/control is already a lot nicer than
> the current situation, AFAIAC. So let's go for that (if somebody does
> the work ;) )
I can do it, in fact doing such work in debian would be easier
Anyway, I don't like
On 29-04-14 20:39, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo [2014-04-29 17:02 -]:
>> What's about the different build-deps?
>
> That's not generally possible, as you can't generate build-deps
> dynamically. In some cases one can use alternatives if a package is
> only present in D or U, and fall ba
Mattia Rizzolo [2014-04-29 17:02 -]:
> What's about the different build-deps?
That's not generally possible, as you can't generate build-deps
dynamically. In some cases one can use alternatives if a package is
only present in D or U, and fall back on the other one. Otherwise
there needs to be
On Apr 29, 2014 6:50 PM, "Martin Pitt" wrote:
> Right, you can do that with something like
>
> if dpkg-vendor --is ubuntu; then \
> [...]
> fi
>
> One can have a debian/patches/ubuntu.series and
> debian/patches/debian.series for that purpose.
What's about the differen
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> What I meant is that there are ways to make changes such that they only
> apply when build by Ubuntu. In that way, the necessary code is in the
> Debian package while not APPLIED in Debian. I remember having used this
> kind of logic at least in
Hello,
Paul Gevers [2014-04-29 16:30 -]:
> I remember having used this kind of logic at least in debian/rules
> file,
Right, you can do that with something like
if dpkg-vendor --is ubuntu; then \
[...]
fi
> although you would need to > search around how to do th
The attachment "debdiff from debian/1.10.8-1" seems to be a debdiff.
The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that
they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment
isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment,
remove the "patch" tag
On 29-04-14 18:13, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Paul Gevers <1208...@bugs.launchpad.net>
> wrote:
>> It would be great if somebody could actually go through the effort of
>> creating a debdiff that we could integrate into the Debian packaging so
>> that we don't need th
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Paul Gevers <1208...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> It would be great if somebody could actually go through the effort of
> creating a debdiff that we could integrate into the Debian packaging so
> that we don't need this dance in the future. This should be doable
> c
On 29-04-14 16:36, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Here there is a debdiff from the current debian package.
>
> ** Patch added: "debdiff from debian/1.10.8-1"
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/liferea/+bug/1208776/+attachment/4100416/+files/1.10.8-1_1.10.8-1u1.debdiff
It would be great if
Here there is a debdiff from the current debian package.
** Patch added: "debdiff from debian/1.10.8-1"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/liferea/+bug/1208776/+attachment/4100416/+files/1.10.8-1_1.10.8-1u1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
This merge will also fix some ubuntu bugs, like the bug #1299649.
** Description changed:
- Upstream version 1.10. x comes with the following new feature missing
- from the 1.8.x series:
+ Debian changelog since the last merge:
- Synchronizes with TheOldReader
+ liferea (1.10.8-1) unstable; ur
1.10.4 fixes a very annoying bug where double-clicking on an item
doesn't open it in the default browser but in Liefrea's own window
(even if opening in Liferea is explicitely disabled in the preferences).
See http://sourceforge.net/p/liferea/bugs/1089/.
--
You received this bug notification beca
** Summary changed:
- Update to most recent upstream version 1.10.1
+ Update to most recent upstream version 1.10.8
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208776
Title:
Update to most recen
19 matches
Mail list logo
