[Bug 116624] Re: Profiles not applied to running processes when AppArmor is started

2009-06-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/apparmor -- Profiles not applied to running processes when AppArmor is started https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-

[Bug 116624] Re: Profiles not applied to running processes when AppArmor is started

2007-07-06 Thread Kees Cook
To note, the ubuntu20 upload now loads the apparmor module from linux- ubuntu-modules in the initramfs. -- Profiles not applied to running processes when AppArmor is started https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 116624] Re: Profiles not applied to running processes when AppArmor is started

2007-06-01 Thread Mathias Gug
apparmor (2.0.1+510.dfsg-0ubuntu8) gutsy; urgency=low * Start apparmor as early as possible in the boot process : just after mountall in rcS.d. Add preinst script to remove symlinks previously installed in rc*.d/. (LP: #116624). * Sync 04-apparmor-status.dpatch with upstream apparm

[Bug 116624] Re: Profiles not applied to running processes when AppArmor is started

2007-05-30 Thread jjohansen
With the current AppArmor code running the AppArmor init script right after mountall is the best solution. A feature on the AppArmor wish list is extremely early init. The current plans are to have apparmor initialize as early as possible, the security_initcall level instead of module_init level

[Bug 116624] Re: Profiles not applied to running processes when AppArmor is started

2007-05-29 Thread Kees Cook
While the profiles can be put on the initrd, I think it is needlessly wasteful of time/space/effort. As long as the modules are loaded in the initrd, we should be in good shape for everything else. If the apparmor init script runs right after mountall, we should have the earliest sane init locati

Re: [Bug 116624] Re: Profiles not applied to running processes when AppArmor is started

2007-05-24 Thread Mathias Gug
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 04:01:11PM -, Kees Cook wrote: > Only processes started after the most recent reload of the 'apparmor' > kernel module are able to be protected. Adding hooks for apparmor > modules to be loaded in the initramfs should help solve this problem. Does this mean that securi

[Bug 116624] Re: Profiles not applied to running processes when AppArmor is started

2007-05-24 Thread Kees Cook
Only processes started after the most recent reload of the 'apparmor' kernel module are able to be protected. Adding hooks for apparmor modules to be loaded in the initramfs should help solve this problem. However, any kernel module upgrades will require a full system reboot. ** Changed in: appar