Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, I am closing it because the bug has been fixed
in the latest development version of Ubuntu - the Intrepid Ibex. It
won't be fixed in previous versions of Ubuntu because the package
doesn't fit the requireme
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 22623
CD-ROMs are not mounted with UTF-8
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22623 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22623
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 22623
CD-ROMs are not mounted with UTF-8
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notifica
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: hal => util-linux
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Many Thanks,
Ingo
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubunt
I nominated this bug for feisty (and for gutsy, to mark it fixed).
I don't yet know how things work in ubuntu but from I understood, this is how
you request a fix in feisty.
Maintainers will reject it if they don't think it's necessary.
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://
I did open a new bug report for this issue. It is:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hal/+bug/157775
Please consider, that I do not have time to do more tests right now,
will be available tomorrow about noon CEST.
So the original bug has been fixed for Gusty, but closing it would not be
BTW, could you also open another bug report for that (something like: "DVD-R
not auto-mounted by Gnome").
We are adding comments not linked to the original bug and the original bug
could be closed for gutsy.
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
Done, here it comes (have choosen PID 7474 for sdc0)
** Attachment added: "addon-storage.strace.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10186410/addon-storage.strace.txt
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notification becau
No need for feisty.
Do:
- eject the dvd
- sudo strace -f -p -o /tmp/addon-storage.strace.txt
- insert the cd
- wait
- ctrl+c
- send the /tmp/addon-storage.strace.txt file.
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this
> Do you have a process named hald-addon-storage ?
Checked under Gusty:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps -Af | grep hald-addon-storage
107 7447 7317 0 13:00 ?00:00:00 hald-addon-storage: polling
/dev/sdb (every 2 sec)
107 7474 7317 0 13:00 ?00:00:00 hald-addon-storage: pol
Do you have a process named hald-addon-storage ?
ps -Af | grep hald-addon-storage
You should have something like:
hald-addon-storage: polling /dev/scd0 (every 2 sec)
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notification
now I rebooted and started Gusty.
Here your commands work fine and I do attach the debug output obtained.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ingo# /etc/init.d/hal stop
* Stopping Hardware abstraction layer hald [ OK ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ingo# su -s /bin/sh haldaemon -c "ha
> You should have had two udi
Here the full output with DVD in the drive:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ingo# hal-device | egrep " udi|scd0" | grep -B 1 scd0
7: udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/storage_model_DVD_RAM_GSA_H30N'
block.device = '/dev/scd0' (string)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ingo#
and
You should have had two udi, the first one should be used and rather look like:
/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/volume_...
did you type:
hal-device | egrep " udi|scd0" | grep -B 1 scd0
while the DVD-R was in the drive ?
If even with the dvd in the drive, you do not have the good udi, then hal
sh
Yann,
thanks for the workaround in Feisty - added 'ro' to the mount options and it
works!
(I do hope it does not matter with DVD-RAM or DVD-RW in that drive, it is a
recorder!)
With this fix applied I did the requested tests in Gusty and Feisty - it does
not mount of course ;-)
GNOME reports a
** Attachment added: "Gusty-gnome-mount.strace.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10179469/Gusty-gnome-mount.strace.txt
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
yes, I first thought that your DVD-R was mounted iso9660 under feisty
and gutsy.
Concerning the first problem under feisty, indeed there is a bug with the mount
command, here is what happens:
- it tries mount with udf, it fails because it can't mount it read-write
- it tries mount with
** Attachment added: "Feisty: mount -t udf /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10178408/mount.strace4.txt
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
You are mixing up some things:
Gusty:
mount /media/cdrom0 2>/tmp/mount.strace1.txt -> mounts udf
mount -t udf /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 2> /tmp/mount.strace2.txt -> mounts udf
Feisty:
mount /media/cdrom0 2>/tmp/mount.strace3.txt -> mounts iso9660!!!
mount -t udf /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 2> /tmp/mo
Strange, the first strace log tells me that the cdrom was mounted with
the udf filesystem.
You confirm that after having done: strace mount /media/cdrom0
the UDF-DVD-R was mounted with the iso9660 filesystem ?
Can you do a "cat /etc/mtab" after the mount ?
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred ove
Here the output comes. I did suppose, you wanted it with the UDF-DVD-R,
which is NOT automounted due to whatever reason under both, Feisty and
Gusty. Output was obtained under Gusty.
Will a potential fix also be applied to Feisty?
** Attachment added: "strace mount -t udf /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0"
Addition:
no automounting under Gusty, but at least both commands resulted in mounting as
udf:
mount.strace1.txt
mount.strace2.txt
--
And here as an addition the same for Feisty, which results in iso9660 mounting:
strace mount /media/cdrom0 2>/tmp/mount.strace3.txt
I real
** Attachment added: "strace mount /media/cdrom0"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10178175/mount.strace1.txt
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug conta
On Gutsy, could you do the following:
sudo strace mount /media/cdrom0 2>/tmp/mount.strace1.txt
sudo umount /media/cdrom0
sudo strace mount -t udf /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 2> /tmp/mount.strace2.txt
sudo umount /media/cdrom0
and attach the /tmp/mount.strace1.txt and /tmp/mount.strace2.txt files.
--
The bug is only partly solved with Gusty. In Feisty it persists completely.
I now report 2 different experiments:
1. using a commercial 9GB-DVD-ROM here which definitely contains UDF-extensions
Gusty correctly automounts with udf.
Feisty automounts with iso9660, here output from
'cat
Found an udf cdrom and I wasn't able to reproduce this bug under gutsy,
the cdrom was mounted with the udf filesystem.
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the b
gnome-volume-manager uses gnome-mount to mount volume.
and if an entry is present in /etc/fstab, gnome-mount will launch the mount
command on the correspond mount point so the fstab options are used.
For the cdrom, gnome-mount will just do:
mount /media/cdrom0
Could you check type that comman
ingo is wright. In my case (7.04 feisty) the DVD with 4GB file on it
doesn't even mount displaying only an error message "Can't mount"
and something like that. With -t udf option - everything goes OK. Must
fix it...
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
I forgot to mention that this bug is really annoying:
if you have files larger than 4 GB on such a disk, then mounting it as
iso9660, displays the filesize modulo 4 GB and it cannot be read out.
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received
That bug still persists in Feisty (kernel 2.6.20-16-generic):
in /etc/fstab:
'/dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0'
automount mounts as 'iso9660' despite it is a pure udf-dvd (iso-level 4, no
Joliet, no Rockridge extensions):
cat /proc/mounts =>
'/dev/scd0 /media
Fixing source package again.
** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gnome-volume-manager => hal
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notific
** Changed in: gnome-volume-manager (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: hal => gnome-volume-manager
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
I guess this is because hal only checks whether the device is in fstab
and thus the user *could* use mount to mount it manually. However,
gnome-mount/hal do their own mount options assembling, so it's very
likely that they just have the wrong preference order.
** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu)
Sourcepac
this might be a bug in 'mount' rather than gnome-volume-manager, or
maybe both? not sure how it works
If i run mount -t udf /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 it happily mounts UDF
--
Mounting UDF should be preferred over ISO9660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112584
You received this bug notification bec
35 matches
Mail list logo
