On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:21:03 -, Micah Gersten wrote:
> Hrm, didn't realize that the changelog was missing # (should be LP:
> #XX), no worries though, manually closing, thanks to the awesome
> Debian maintainers for getting this fixed
> - debian/rules: remove mozilla check from tuxguit
Hrm, didn't realize that the changelog was missing # (should be LP:
#XX), no worries though, manually closing, thanks to the awesome
Debian maintainers for getting this fixed
tuxguitar (1.2-14) experimental; urgency=low
* Team upload.
[ Philippe Coval ]
* Supports also jack2 (Closes: #
On 03/13/2013 05:42 AM, Tony Mancill wrote:
> On 03/12/2013 01:23 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:15:30 -, Philippe Coval wrote:
>>
> You can try to upload to debian too since it's under co-maintenance
> now
Thanks!
>>> I give you white card ...
>>
>> Merci !
>
On 03/12/2013 01:23 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:15:30 -, Philippe Coval wrote:
>
You can try to upload to debian too since it's under co-maintenance
now
>>> Thanks!
>> I give you white card ...
>
> Merci !
>
>> feel free to join the java team , I am sure th
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:15:30 -, Philippe Coval wrote:
> >> You can try to upload to debian too since it's under co-maintenance
> >> now
> > Thanks!
> I give you white card ...
Merci !
> feel free to join the java team , I am sure there are tips to be shared
I'm alrady a member :)
Ok, I've
Syncing from experimental is fine, thanks. Also, thanks to Philippe for
being open to the changes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123416
Title:
raring: tuxguitar doesn't start due t
On 03/12/2013 06:08 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:08:49 -, Philippe Coval wrote:
>
>> You can try to upload to debian too since it's under co-maintenance
> now
>
> Thanks!
I give you white card ...
feel free to join the java team , I am sure there are tips to be share
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:08:49 -, Philippe Coval wrote:
> You can try to upload to debian too since it's under co-maintenance
now
Thanks!
I wouldn't upload an invasive patch like this without maintainer
consent, but I've you reviewed it and are ok with it, I'm happy tp go
ahead. (And tag and pu
@gregor
The patch looks great and seems to work fine. I'd be happy to sync the package
once it's uploaded to Debian. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123416
Title:
raring: t
You can try to upload to debian too since it's under co-maintenance now
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123416
Title:
raring: tuxguitar doesn't start due to erroneous startup script
On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 05:49:34 -, Micah Gersten wrote:
> As for the idea of using dpkg-vendor, we can't use that in the shell
> script since it's not guaranteed to be installed (it's in build
> essential). I'd be up for patching the script to be conditionally set
> at build time with a substitu
As for the idea of using dpkg-vendor, we can't use that in the shell
script since it's not guaranteed to be installed (it's in build
essential). I'd be up for patching the script to be conditionally set
at build time with a substitution variable to check for mozilla or not.
--
You received this
Sorry, I'll fix this later today. Thanks for reporting it.
** Changed in: tuxguitar (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: tuxguitar (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Micah Gersten (micahg)
** Changed in: tuxguitar (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You re
[with patch]
Hi Toni, Hi Phillip,
I have found you on the maintainer list for Debian tuxguitar.
I guess this this problme here might also affect tuxguitar on Debian.
steve-m was so keen to create a patch for this problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
The attachment "0001-tuxguitar.patch" of this bug report has been
identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been
subscribed to the bug report so that they can review the patch. In the
event that this is in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by
removing the tag 'patch
15 matches
Mail list logo
