[Bug 1091186] Re: Backport upstream bug 13844 - fix for futex issue

2013-04-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package eglibc - 2.15-0ubuntu20.1 --- eglibc (2.15-0ubuntu20.1) quantal; urgency=low * Add patch ubuntu/local-disable-nscd-netgroup-caching.diff to disable netgroup caching in the default config (LP: #1068889) * Backport any/cvs-malloc-deadlock.diff f

[Bug 1091186] Re: Backport upstream bug 13844 - fix for futex issue

2013-04-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package eglibc - 2.15-0ubuntu10.4 --- eglibc (2.15-0ubuntu10.4) precise; urgency=low * Add patch ubuntu/local-disable-nscd-netgroup-caching.diff to disable netgroup caching in the default config (LP: #1068889) * Backport any/cvs-malloc-deadlock.diff f

[Bug 1091186] Re: Backport upstream bug 13844 - fix for futex issue

2013-04-23 Thread Adam Conrad
Marking verification-done based on the above comments, and that no one's been able to reproduce the LTP issues with the new version. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 1091186] Re: Backport upstream bug 13844 - fix for futex issue

2013-01-30 Thread Mark Rutland
Originally, when we ran a 32bit mallocstress under a 64bit kernel on an ARM fast model, mallocstress would deadlock (even with relatively small numbers of threads and loops). Will Deacon looked into this, and saw that all threads were waiting for the same futex. We believe the non- atomic eglibc lo

[Bug 1091186] Re: Backport upstream bug 13844 - fix for futex issue

2013-01-28 Thread Colin Watson
Hello Linaro, or anyone else affected, Accepted eglibc into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/2.15-0ubuntu10.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://w

[Bug 1091186] Re: Backport upstream bug 13844 - fix for futex issue

2013-01-28 Thread Adam Conrad
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adam Conrad (adconrad) ** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Quantal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adam Conrad (adconrad) ** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adam Conrad (adconrad) -- You received this bug

[Bug 1091186] Re: Backport upstream bug 13844 - fix for futex issue

2013-01-27 Thread Adam Conrad
** Description changed: - There is a subtle futex bug in glibc 2.15 which is fixed dealt with by - BZ #13844 (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13844). + [Impact / Justification] + There was a bug in glibc where custom lowlevellock implementations weren't being used, but rather the g

[Bug 1091186] Re: Backport upstream bug 13844 - fix for futex issue

2013-01-27 Thread Adam Conrad
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091186 Title: Backport upstream bug 13844 - fix for futex issue To manage notificati

[Bug 1091186] Re: Backport upstream bug 13844 - fix for futex issue

2012-12-17 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 8 comments from the remote bug at http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13844. If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://he

[Bug 1091186] Re: Backport upstream bug 13844 - fix for futex issue

2012-12-17 Thread Matthias Klose
** Also affects: eglibc (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #13844 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13844 ** Also affects: eglibc via http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13844 Importance: Unknow