[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-23 Thread Adam Conrad
Override component to main unity-firefox-extension 2.3.2-0ubuntu1 in quantal: universe/web -> main libufe-xidgetter0 2.3.2-0ubuntu1 in quantal amd64: universe/libs/optional -> main libufe-xidgetter0 2.3.2-0ubuntu1 in quantal armel: universe/libs/optional -> main libufe-xidgetter0 2.3.2-0ubuntu1 i

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-22 Thread Michael Terry
** Also affects: webapps-applications (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: unity-firefox-extension (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: webapps-greasemonkey (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: unity

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-21 Thread Michael Terry
** Description changed: There are some webapps packages that want to be added. I'm helping with the paperwork here, and will be pre-reviewing them (since time is short) before their FFes are actually granted. - All three are in quantal-proposed & NEW. + None are yet in quantal. == w

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-21 Thread Michael Terry
** Description changed: There are some webapps packages that want to be added. I'm helping with the paperwork here, and will be pre-reviewing them (since time is short) before their FFes are actually granted. None are yet in quantal. == webapps-applications == Holds the actua

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Matthias Klose
Override component to main polib 1.0.0-2 in quantal: universe/python -> main python-polib 1.0.0-2 in quantal amd64: universe/python/optional -> main python-polib 1.0.0-2 in quantal armel: universe/python/optional -> main python-polib 1.0.0-2 in quantal armhf: universe/python/optional -> main python

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
In my packaging branch, test has been fixed. Approved. ** Changed in: unity-firefox-extension Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053463 Title:

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Regarding mozjs for the testsuite-- disabling the testsuite in the build is fine. If instructions can be given on how to run the tests, I'll add a QRT test for webapps-applications that can be used to run the tests. This can be pulled into automated tests, used for SRUs and by the security team. -

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Kate Stewart
** Also affects: polib (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053463 Title: [MIR] webapps packages To manage notificat

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
I'll approve greasemonkey plugin too, based on its basic simplicity and the understanding that Chris Coulson looked at it already. Upstream is very active, builds fine. It doesn't have a test suite yet, which I don't like. So I filed bug 1053621 to track that. ** Changed in: webapps-greasemonke

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Robert Carr
Hi Michael! Some comments on the nits: The naming is a little tricky! the ubuntuone desktop is named the same one as the unity-webapps generated one so it will be replaced once the webapp is initialized. I am open (and enthused) to changing the naming scheme for the R cycle but am unwilling to tou

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
** Description changed: There are some webapps packages that want to be added. I'm helping with the paperwork here, and will be pre-reviewing them (since time is short) before their FFes are actually granted. None are yet in quantal. == webapps-applications == Holds the actua

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
webapps-applications looks fine, after a new release and fixes to the packaging to make it not need gjs. The test suite turns out to not be runnable by Ubuntu after all, since it needs username/passwords to various web sites to work. But upstream does run it on their Jenkins setup. So I think th

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
** Changed in: unity-firefox-extension Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053463 Title: [MIR] webapps packages To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
unity-firefox-extension looks mostly OK. With the understanding that Chris Coulson looked at it, I've looked it over and it seems OK. The one issue was that the test suite wasn't being run, but I fixed that in the packaging. And with that fix, I see one of the tests fail. That's being looked int

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
OK, looks like we can get a tarball that doesn't need JS to build (except for tests). ** No longer affects: mozjs (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: gjs (Ubuntu) ** Description changed: There are some webapps packages that want to be added. I'm helping with the paperwork here, and will be pre-

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
Robert, security team doesn't want that either. They are trying to reduce usage of webkit as is. Another idea is to drop the need for JS. It is apparently used for 2 things right now: the test suite and generating bindings. If we could generate bindings at tarball time and use dep8 for the test

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Robert Carr
It's possible (hopefully, not sure about some of the javascript libraries we are using in the test system they might require mozjs features) to replace gjs/mozjs relatively easily (but not trivially) with Seed/libjavascriptcoregtk. libjavascriptcoregtk seems to be already in main. -- You received

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
So webapps-applications only uses gjs/mozjs for building. We don't likely want mozjs in main. But what about bundling a copy in webapps- applications? That way we could avoid a loose mojzs in main. Assigning to security team for a check on this crazy idea. ** Changed in: mozjs (Ubuntu) As

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
mterry: seeing as how mozjs is ripe with known security vulnerabilities because the standalone version is unmaintained, I'd say it has a pretty slim chance of making it in main mterry: probably worth opening a separate MIR for it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
polib is approved. Has test suite, builds both python3 and python2 versions, uses dh_pythonX, we're in sync, builds clean, no security history, no important bugs. ** Changed in: polib (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
** Description changed: There are some webapps packages that want to be added. I'm helping with the paperwork here, and will be pre-reviewing them (since time is short) before their FFes are actually granted. None are yet in quantal. == webapps-applications == Holds the actua

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
** Package changed: ubuntu => gjs (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: mozjs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: polib (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: webapps-applications Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: w

[Bug 1053463] Re: [MIR] webapps packages

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Terry
** Description changed: There are some webapps packages that want to be added. I'm helping with the paperwork here, and will be pre-reviewing them (since time is short) before their FFes are actually granted. None are yet in quantal. == webapps-applications == Holds the actua