*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 220493 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220493
On 12/14/2011 12:01 PM, bobdum wrote:
> So you intend that someone who want to migrate from a windows
> fakeraid to a "pure linux raid system" is obliged to have a second
> machine under *nux system, with the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 220493 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220493
Phillip Susi (psusi) wrote 1 hour ago:
Don't use fakeraid; it isn't well supported and is buggy. Use regular
software raid instead, which works much better. The only reason to use
fakeraid is if you dual boot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 220493 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220493
On 12/14/2011 5:50 AM, Doudz wrote:
> I'm trying to install Ubuntu 11.10 server on a Tyan GT20B7002 server using
> fakeraid ICH10R raid 5
> dmraid says that raid45 is not in kernel but I think it would be rai
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 220493 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220493
I'm trying to install Ubuntu 11.10 server on a Tyan GT20B7002 server using
fakeraid ICH10R raid 5
dmraid says that raid45 is not in kernel but I think it would be raid456
the result is a raid volume activat
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 220493 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220493
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 220493 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220493
** Changed in: dmraid (Debian)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification because you a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 220493 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220493
It is actually NOT working in Hardy now. It looks like a potential fix
was made but it has still not been uploaded to -updates.
It also does not appear to have made it into Intrepid either, as of
linux-image
** Changed in: dmraid (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
** Changed in: dmraid (Debian)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
** Changed in: dmraid (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
This is working Hardy now.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220493
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: dmraid (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #411172
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=411172
** Also affects: dmraid (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=411172
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses ra
** Also affects: devmapper (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I feel your pain Chad... I've been looking to get this running since
Feisty myself. Since it was working with Hardy beta, I decided to
install it on my desktop. Imagine my surprise when I found out that it
was broken again in the final release!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bu
I'd like to meet these people who suggest to use just use linux software
raid. It has its purpose, and we would be using it if it fit the bill. The
computer with $500 worth of hard drives, the huge case and power supply
needed to run them, and all that jazz, is probably the best computer in the
h
I don't expect this to be fixed anytime soon.
Despite software fake RAID being on a majority of shipping motherboards,
and despite dmraid being in a workable place with the correct kernel
modifications, there just isn't any interest in adding this
functionality to Ubuntu. Most responses consist of
> If you can afford it, you might want to get a hardware raid card.
Also don't forget that for pure Linux boxes, Linux software raid is
probably the best solution, and with almost no performance penalty.
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
no one in the ubuntu community seems to care. They don't aim it towards the
people who use raid5. they aim it towards the people who can't even
diagnose a compiz problem with their video driver.
There was that one guy working on the bug before. I was helping him, but i
lost access to the hardwa
Let me try to summarize what has happened so far:
- this bug has been posted more than one year ago
- Feisty has come and gone
- so has Gutsy
- Hardy is one day before release, with this problem still being unsolved
I have been using Ubuntu now for almost one year. So far, I've been
pleasantly su
Nope, it won't be in Gutsy. Upstream is still working on it.
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Is there hope that it will be included in gutsy? It would be a shame not
to because most motherboards sold now support it and more and more
people need it to be able to dual boot with windows.
I will have a new computer next week with 3 disks so I want to use raid5
and dual-boot windows. Maybe I w
Richard, i made the sim link and put the module in the initrd, along
with the dm-raid4-5 module and there is no longer a problem of that
error.
I still get some hangs in the boot process but they are probably related
to something else.
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https:
Bishen, why are you using an old kernel and do you have the patch to
enable raid5?
I know we are trying to fix dmraid, but that isn't sufficient for raid5.
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification because you
With the symlink, if it even works, you still wont be able to boot from it
because there will be no raid45 or raid456 symlink in the initramfs.
Don't do the raid456 symlink since the version of dmraid release for feisty it
expecting raid45. Create that symlink instead and see if it works.
--
dm
Hi I've also been trying to get dmraid to work to set up a Fake-Raid 5 array on
Ubuntu Feisty (64bit) alpha. I have been following this thread and tried the
posted suggestions. In reply to the last posts by nox216 and Richard, creating
symlinks to the raid456.ko module does not work. Though, the
If all that is required is a linking then link use raid45.ko as the
symlink and use the published dmraid package, not the one I've uploaded
to this bug report.
Since ubuntu's kernel does not yet have the raid456.ko module I'm not
going to commit the changes I did to the dmraid package (which was
s
Chad, I'm currently at work so I can't do much work at the moment to
verify or test this, but a post over at the Fedora kernel list mentions
symlinking the other modules to raid456.ko http://www.mail-
archive.com/fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com/msg00090.html">here for
backwards compatibility.
I no l
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: dmraid
This packaged version of dmraid, for RAID setups other than 0 or 1, is
still looking for kernel module raid45, when I believe the kernel has
been using module raid456 since kernel 2.6.18.
+
+ This depends on bug 97655
--
dmraid look
But raid456 is already in the kernel. dmraid is having some kind of
other trouble. What is causing the 4 minute delay? I had everything
working in Edgy just fine. I had to compile the newest dmraid, and a
kernel, but it was working. now its broke in feisty.
by the time the feisty +1 is ready fo
Hi Chad, I'm sorry to say that this most likely wont be fixed in time
for Feisty's release. In order to have a proper and stable release
different parts of Ubuntu have to be frozen at different times, and the
kernel was frozen back on April 5th:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeistyReleaseSchedule
Since
Ok, it's not really any more broken than before. The computer does work
minus the raid of course. It still has the annoying 4 minute delay
during boot though. I tried both the official and your version. I even
made sure to do a complete uninstall between versions. I even updated
the initramd f
i tried this yesterday and it broke the computer worse. If i go back to
the lab today, I can try getting the computer to boot, otherwise we have
a serious problem.
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification beca
yea i forgot, i have plenty of reasons to go back to campus this weekend. I'll
test this today. just wish i had the dm-raid4-5 patch though. however, the bug
has been confirmed and added to the wishlist, so here's hoping it makes it into
fesity. maybe fesity +1 can have support in the installe
thank you. Unfortunately I am not at home to celebrate the weekend with
my friend Jack Daniel and some others. Hopefully i can get around to
testing it this weekend, if not monday when I'm forced to go back to
that computer. :)
yea I had the dm-raid4-5 module working for 2.6.19 custom compiled,
Chad, you can test with this package.
** Attachment added: "dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu3_amd64_rmjb.deb"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7193021/dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu3_amd64_rmjb.deb
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received t
Ah, okay, I'd found that information for 2.6.18 before, but didn't know
if it'd been committed for 2.6.20 or not. Makes sense as to why it can't
be mounted, then.
I'd say adding that module as a dependency of dmraid (or even as another
package entirely) would make a number of folks' lives easier i
Can I please have the x86_64 version of that package?
Nox, you won't be able to get a raid5 array working with just this
package. I'd love the package though because there are other problems.
to get a raid 5 array working, you also need the dm-raid4-5.ko module.
Unfortunately, I can't find a patc
Can I please have the x86_64 version of that package?
Nox, you won't be able to get a raid5 array working with just this
package. I'd love the package though because there are other problems.
to get a raid 5 array working, you also need the dm-raid4-5.ko module.
Unfortunately, I can't find a patc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/97655
This bug explains what's needed to get a Nvidia (and other chipset) fake
raid 5 arrays working.
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification
Okay, I've got it installed. Keep in mind this is using a Feisty beta
CD, but dmraid setting up devices no longer locks up and now I can list
the proper RAID array using dmraid -r. This looks to be much improved,
as before it would only hang on anything involving dmraid.
I still can't mount the RA
Please test this package to see if it works. This will work on the i386
architecture. If you used x86_64 let me know.
** Attachment added: "dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu3_i386_rmjb.deb"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7180622/dmraid_1.0.0.rc13-2ubuntu3_i386_rmjb.deb
--
dmraid looking for raid45
Hello nox216, what architecture are you using? I would like you to test an
updated package before I submit the patch.
Time is of the essence since Feisty is only 2 weeks away.
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notif
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Richard Bailey
Status: Unconfirmed => In Progress
--
dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
44 matches
Mail list logo
