** Changed in: gcal (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
(Unsubscribing ubuntu-universe-sponsors for now and subscribing Daniel
and me.)
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Given that the package is quite abandoned, the changes look good to me
(as long as you forward the debdiff to Debian -in a bug, not in a
private mail to the Maintainer-), except one of them: don't change the
debhelper level to 6, but instead to 4 or 5 (to make backports easier).
Daniel, are you OK
** Changed in: gcal (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
** Also affects: gcal (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266365
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
The patch has been forwarded to Debian bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266365
Also, please note gcal was orphaned in Debian 10 days ago:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465930
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
This bug was fixed in the package gcal - 3.01.1-5.1ubuntu1
---
gcal (3.01.1-5.1ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* Rebuild to fix segfault on amd64 (LP: #102373)
* Change quoting of CFLAGS, to prevent FTBFS with latest dpkg version
* Correct lintian warnings:
- Escape minus signs
Uploaded (after changing compat level to 4). Thanks!
** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) (rainct)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
You received this bug notification because y
Looks good. Go ahead and upload! :-)
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists
Considering the very low update frequency from debian and the guidelines given
here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg256671.html it seemed
good to me to give the package a full uplift, including the debhelper and
standards-version bump. In my opinion the chance we would need to
Why is the new debhelper version necessary? Also you introduce quite a
lot of other changes over the Debian package, which need to be merged
manually. All these changes would only make sense if they go to Debian
too.
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu)
Assignee: albert (albrt) => (unassigned)
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
Sponsor, can you please sponsor this update for gcal?
gcal has given segfaults on amd64 since dapper, and has not been rebuilt
since 2005. Last week a rebuild solved the problem, but now a change in
the CFLAGS setting is required to build with the latest dpkg version.
Since a change is needed anyw
The problem is still present in Hardy on amd64. A rebuild fixes the
problem, but the package needs a little more work.
** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => albert (albrt)
Status: New => In Progress
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Yes, for me too on amd64.
I have attached gcal.[sl]trace
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 01:59:39 pm Matt C wrote:
> gcal is crashing for me in Gutsy.
>
> ** Attachment added: "_usr_bin_gcal.1000.crash"
>http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10134700/_usr_bin_gcal.1000.crash
--
Jeff Bralley 251-599-125
gcal is crashing for me in Gutsy.
** Attachment added: "_usr_bin_gcal.1000.crash"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10134700/_usr_bin_gcal.1000.crash
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
On Saturday 06 October 2007 11:12:33 am jclemon wrote:
> gcal seems to be working ok in Gutsy beta
>
Yes it is.
Thanks.
--
Jeff Bralley 251-599-1259 CST Mobile,AL,USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bralley.networklight.net/ http://bralley.com/
!Increase the Dosage!
--
gcal fail
gcal seems to be working ok in Gutsy beta
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
** Summary changed:
- gcal failed with a segnentation fault.
+ gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
--
gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
20 matches
Mail list logo
