Re: [Bit-team] [Bug 466088] Re: BackInTime karmic package missing depends on menu

2009-12-08 Thread Bart de Koning
OK, thanks for the information, most probably we will stick to gksu then... 2009/12/7 Jonathan Wiltshire > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 01:06:57PM -, Bart de Koning wrote: > > Upstream we use gksu, it is changed to su-to-root in the ubuntu packages, > > however it seems to be a very neat solution

Re: [Bit-team] [Bug 466088] Re: BackInTime karmic package missing depends on menu

2009-12-07 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 01:06:57PM -, Bart de Koning wrote: > Upstream we use gksu, it is changed to su-to-root in the ubuntu packages, > however it seems to be a very neat solution for a common encountered > problem. > Are there any strong arguments not to switch upstream, eg what is the > ava

Re: [Bit-team] [Bug 466088] Re: BackInTime karmic package missing depends on menu

2009-12-07 Thread Bart de Koning
Upstream we use gksu, it is changed to su-to-root in the ubuntu packages, however it seems to be a very neat solution for a common encountered problem. Are there any strong arguments not to switch upstream, eg what is the availability of su-to-root on other distributions, like Suse, or Fedora, or i