I can confirm as well that lightdm v1.2.3-0ubuntu2.7 has indeed fixed
this issue for me. Thank you for the quick turnaround!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431654
Title:
lightdm (1.
Looks like that did it:
root 18958 0.0 0.0 270668 3496 ?Ssl 23:26 0:00 lightdm
root 18964 11.0 1.0 246424 133256 tty7Ss+ 23:26 0:08 /usr/bin/X :0
-auth /var/run/lightdm/root/:0 -nolisten tcp vt7 -novtswitch
Good work!
--
You received this bug notification because
Unfortunately, the 2nd patch still produces the high cpu usage on one
core:
root 2054 93.8 0.0 270668 3488 ?Rsl 22:35 1:40 lightdm
root 2091 10.4 1.3 283756 170820 tty7Ss+ 22:35 0:11 /usr/bin/X :0
-auth /var/run/lightdm/root/:0 -nolisten tcp vt7 -novtswitch
--
You
First patch didn't fix the issue:
root 11395 93.0 0.0 270668 3488 ?Rsl 22:26 1:00 lightdm
root 11401 12.3 1.2 263008 149876 tty7Ss+ 22:26 0:08 /usr/bin/X :0
-auth /var/run/lightdm/root/:0 -nolisten tcp vt7 -novtswitch
I will try the 2nd one now.
--
You received thi
To add to comment #17, just now I replaced my empty 09_close_pipes.patch
file with the actual patch, then rebuilt, installed and restarted the
lightdm process. Upon logging in, it's back to using 100% of a cpu core
again. So when the 09 patch is removed, no high cpu usage. When the
patch is put
I may not be doing this correctly, but I ran the following to attempt to
debug the running lightdm process using the package from the precise
proposed ppa again. The command I ran is:
sudo gdb lightdm 24513
Of course, 24513 was the running lightdm process. Interesting thing
here is, once gd
Hi Robert,
While I am a developer, I don't have much experience developing in Linux
or using Bazaar (bzr). With that being said, I wasn't exactly sure how
to disable a patch per say, so what I did was backed up
09_close_pipes.patch by moving it to my desktop, then issuing "touch
09_close_pipes.pa
Also, an addendum to the previous instructions, the Ubuntu repo that has
version 1.2.3-0ubuntu2.5 of lightdm is the precise-updates repo. To add
that repository, do the following:
>From terminal:
sudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list
Add the following lines to the end of your file:
## U
FYI, in case there are some lesser experienced users that have this
issue and are looking for a temporary solution for the time being, below
are the instructions to revert to the previous release of lightdm until
this gets resolved.
You can do this with the following command in a terminal ():
If it helps, here's the x-0-greeter.log file while running lightdm
v1.2.3-0ubuntu2.5 (when the 100% usage doesn't occur).
** Attachment added: "x-0-greeter1.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1431654/+attachment/4343757/+files/x-0-greeter1.log
--
You received this bu
Here's the x-0-greeter.log file generated from lightdm
v1.2.3-0ubuntu2.6.
** Attachment added: "x-0-greeter.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1431654/+attachment/4343749/+files/x-0-greeter.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I apologize, the version of the kernel that was running when log file
was generated was 3.2.0-79-generic (not 3.2.0-19-generic). Sorry for
the typo.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14316
Here is the lightdm log file pulled from /var/log/lightdm/lightdm.log.
At 98.76s, I logged out of my session, but didn't get a log-in screen
again (black screen on both monitors).
At this point I killed the process (28882) so that I could downgrade
lightdm again (from ctrl+alt+F1) and log back in.
Public bug reported:
Since updating lightdm today, one core of my CPU is always maxed out at
100%. I rolled back to version 1.2.3-0ubuntu2.5 and the issue stopped.
I tried this with 2 different kernels: 3.2.0-77-generic and
3.2.0-79-generic and and version 1.2.3-0ubuntu2.6 of lightdm still
caused
I'm running 12.04.02 AMD64. I upgraded qBittorrent to v3.0.9 today and
started to get this error myself. The only thing that seemed to work
was to revert libtorrent-rasterbar6 to version 0.15.10-1.
apt-get install libtorrent-rasterbar6=0.15.10-1
Before doing this, when I got the following resul
This bug affects me and is driving me crazy. I'm only using Empathy for
GoogleTalk; 1 Google App account and one standard account. It seems to
affect my Google App account more.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
When I run this version of G-S-D from terminal, I see this in the
output:
(gnome-settings-daemon:2845): media-keys-plugin-WARNING **: Grab failed
for some keys, another application may already have access the them.
I'm still having this issue with 11.10
--
You received this bug notification bec
I installed the proposed fix for gnome-settings-daemon, but I still have
this issue. Or is this going to be part of a newer build of the Gnome
Settings Daemon?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
For the log of all that is Holy, please add this option. With it being
an option, people can agree or disagree, but at least it will be there
for people like me who are missing conversations because I don't have
the contact list open all the time... I know, there's a little blue
envelop in the Un
I was already running the latest revision of Empathy and I also had this
issue. I fixed this on my Oneiric 11.10 install by running: sudo apt-
get install libfolks*
Granted, I many not need these other packages, but it works, so I'm
happy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
I would also like to see an option to be able to minimize with a single-
click. Let's face it, the Unity Launcher is a dock. All 3rd party
docks that are used in Ubuntu have a single click minimize, Mac OS X has
a single-click minimize, Windows has always had a single-click minimize
for their tas
Unfortunately, this is a locked-down OEM BIOS. About the only thing I
can change is the date.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668392
Title:
HP blu-ray drive gets softreset failed erro
BTW, my SATA controller is set to RAID mode and the grub modifier
worked. My blu-ray drive is set on the 3rd port now, so the grub mod I
used is:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="libata.force=3:nohrst"
On my board, the port numbers start with 1 and not 0 like most boards
do. I added this line to my /etc/def
Nevermind. Please disregard my last comment. Markus Feist, you are
AWESOME! It was my fault that your grub mod wasn't working for me as I
forgot that on my board, there is no sata-0 and that it starts at 1,
once I adjusted, my CH20L blu-ray drive started working and Ubuntu
booted just as fast as
I tried the GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="libata.force=5:nohrst" in my
/etc/default/grub file and rebuilding grub with update-grub2, but saw no
change. dmesg still reported the exact same softreset issues. This was
with me putting a disc in the drive at boot and having tried under IDE,
ACHI and RAID. Stil
I couldn't find the image file for the current build, so I installed and
tested the next best thing and attached the dmesg output to this
comment. No change in the bug/issue. This kernel took even longer to
boot than the others. If you know of the links to the current kernel
image and headers th
Just a bump on this bug. I installed the new 2.6.35-23-generic kernel
via software update in Ubuntu today and tried the Blu-Ray drive, but
still no success. The dmesg is attached.
** Attachment added: "dmesg-Kernel-2.6.35-23-generic.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/6
Sure. I attached it here. Sorry for the delay in response. I was away
from my machine over the weekend. Hope it helps!
** Attachment added: "dmesg-ubuntu-x32-2.6.35-22-generic.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/668392/+attachment/1726915/+files/dmesg-ubuntu-x32-2.6.3
OK. I managed to compile the 2.6.35 kernel following this guide:
http://duopetalflower.blogspot.com/2010/10/ubuntu-maverick-64bit-
kernel.html I only set CONFIG_SATA_PMP = n and compiled a kernel aptly
called 2.6.35-22-nopmp. Yet, it seems that this did not fix the issue.
It did provide some dif
I attempted to rebuild the amd64 2.6.35 kernel that comes with Maverick
with CONFIG_SATA_PMP = n, but I the build failed with errors. I've
never compiled a kernel before, so it's very likely I missed something
or didn't do something correctly. If someone could build the current
amd64 kernel that
Apparently, this is not the first time this bug has been reported.
Please see the following link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/285392?comments=all
It seems to be a bug in SATA PMP (Port Multiplier).
--
HP blu-ray drive gets softreset failed errors on 64 bit but not 32 bi
I just attempted booting up kernel 2.6.37-999 as well (daily build Nov.
3rd 2011) using the following packages and SATA port 3 enabled:
linux-image-2.6.37-999-generic_2.6.37-999.201011031118_amd64.deb
03-Nov-2010 12:2532M
linux-headers-2.6.37-999_2.6.37-999.201011031118_all.deb
OK. The issue still occurs with v2.6.35.8-maverick. I downloaded the
following packages, installed and tested with SATA port 3 enabled:
linux-headers-2.6.35-02063508-generic_2.6.35-02063508.201010291110_amd64.deb
29-Oct-2010 12:20 728K
linux-headers-2.6.35-02063508_2.6.35-02063508.
OK. I can confirm that this issue is related to 64 bit Linux distros
only. I tried a few different 32 bit Linux distros via LiveCD,
including 32 bit Ubuntu 10.10 and all of them detected the blu-ray drive
and started up almost instantly. I checked dmesg on all of them and not
one showed the soft
I will try the 32 bit Ubuntu live disc in the morning and let you know.
Yeah, I hate HP also, especially when it comes to finding product specs
and information or their response time on firmware updates when they are
obviously needed.
--
blu-ray drive gets softreset failed errors
https://bugs.lau
HP BDDVDRW CH20L. For the record, I tried booting more than one recent
Linux distro with the BIOS set to IDE, AHCI, and RAID. The issue occurs
with all three scenarios. This drive is SATA and has no jumpers. If
you google, "CH20L Linux", you will see this is becoming a growing issue
as of late.
I apologize, this was the first time I tried to report a bug for Ubuntu.
I attached the requested dmesg file.
** Attachment added: "Newer dmesg log with SATA port 3 enabled (port Blu-ray is
connected to)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/668392/+attachment/1718848/+files/d
--
Missing blu-ray drive support causes restart/shutdown problems and delays
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.
Public bug reported:
When attempting to install Ubuntu 10.10 AMD64 on my HP Pavilion Elite
HPE-235f, booting of the LiveCD fails. I get the same bug reported in
the post at: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1052987 (see
screenshots). I installed Ubuntu 10.10 AMD64 via flash drive, but
bo
39 matches
Mail list logo
