[Bug 1048577] Re: Opera Web Browser's fails tabs on Ubuntu 12.10

2012-10-18 Thread ruario
Hi, I work for Opera. We did a minor update today for Opera verison 12.02 (build 1629) which includes a fix http://my.opera.com/ruario/blog/2012/10/02/problems- running-12-10-on-12-10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 947236] Re: Please provide /etc/os-release

2012-08-29 Thread ruario
> We'll basically get this for free the next time we merge base-files from Debian. You will get the file for free but it will still need adjusting to have Ubuntu specific information. As a side note, in addition to the distros I listed earlier I noticed that Gentoo also added this 3 months back:

[Bug 947236] Re: Please provide /etc/os-release

2012-08-23 Thread ruario
Not sure why I listed Fedora, twice. That was a mistake! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947236 Title: Please provide /etc/os-release To manage notifications about this bug go to: htt

[Bug 947236] Re: Please provide /etc/os-release

2012-08-23 Thread ruario
F.Y.I The file is already present in recent versions of the following distros: Angstrom, ArchLinux, Debian (sid), Fedora, Frugalware, OpenSUSE, Fedora, Mageia (and possibly others), so Ubuntu is a little behind on this one. Will this be fixed in time for Quantal? -- You received this bug notifica

[Bug 933888] Re: add /etc/os-release file

2012-08-23 Thread ruario
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 947236 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947236 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 947236 Please provide /etc/os-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 877143] Re: Missing icons and broken theme after updating to 11.10

2011-12-02 Thread ruario
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 873545 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873545 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 879793 No GTK theme applied on login, should be Ambiance ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 873545 After update Nautilus icons are black/white, no

[Bug 879793] Re: No GTK theme applied on login, should be Ambiance

2011-12-02 Thread ruario
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 873545 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873545 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 873545 After update Nautilus icons are black/white, no decorations of breadcrumb etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 873545] Re: After update Nautilus icons are black/white, no decorations of breadcrumb etc.

2011-12-02 Thread ruario
http://my.opera.com/ruario/blog/2011/12/02/styling-lost-opera-shutdown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873545 Title: After update Nautilus icons are black/white, no decorations of

[Bug 868188] Re: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened"

2011-10-19 Thread ruario
One more comment (hope people are not getting bored of me). If you do want to go down the dependency route, you could have the recommend be the xz-lzma package rather than the lzma package. The difference being that xz-lzma does not include any new binaries itself but rather is a set of symlinks po

[Bug 868188] Re: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened"

2011-10-19 Thread ruario
Ok, worked this out. My /etc/apt/sources.list contained: deb http://no.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-proposed restricted main multiverse universe I changed this to: deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-proposed restricted main multiverse universe and I got further updates. This ti

[Bug 868188] Re: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened"

2011-10-19 Thread ruario
Ok, I may be doing something wrong or misunderstanding something and if so please point it out to me but this fix doesn't seem to work for me. I enabled oneiric-proposed via "Ubuntu Software Center→Edit→Software Sources→Updates". Then I ran Update Manager, which found found an update to Software C

[Bug 868188] Re: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened"

2011-10-19 Thread ruario
Just a quick comment. When testing don't use an Opera package to verify as we updated our stable packages to use bzip2 compression in the mean time, whilst we await this fix making its way down to regular users. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 869685] Re: Always fails to install 3rd party debs

2011-10-18 Thread ruario
see also: http://my.opera.com/community/forums/findpost.pl?id=10564932 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869685 Title: Always fails to install 3rd party debs To manage notifications ab

[Bug 869685] Re: Always fails to install 3rd party debs

2011-10-18 Thread ruario
Try this: ar t /home/rogerb/Downloads/google-musicmanager-beta_current_amd64.deb Is the data.tar inside lzma compressed? If yes then this is a dupe of 868188. You can work around it in one of three ways 1. Installing with dpkg 2. Installing either the lzma or xz-lzma packages as they provide /

[Bug 854164] Re: Internal Error: deb file could not be opened.

2011-10-18 Thread ruario
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 868188 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 868188 "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 858246] Re: Software center cannot install opera deb file: Internal Error

2011-10-18 Thread ruario
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 868188 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 868188 "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 872556] Re: Failed to install Opera 11.51 in Oneiric

2011-10-18 Thread ruario
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 868188 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 858246 Software center cannot install opera deb file: Internal Error ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 868188 "Internal Error ...google-chrome-sta

[Bug 875767] Re: Software center doesn't allow to install Opera browser

2011-10-18 Thread ruario
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 868188 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 858246 Software center cannot install opera deb file: Internal Error ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 868188 "Internal Error ...google-chrome-sta

[Bug 868188] Re: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened"

2011-10-18 Thread ruario
Will a Recommends lzma be enough to actually install it without any user interaction? Is the default in Ubuntu now to install Recommends by default? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188

[Bug 868188] Re: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened"

2011-10-18 Thread ruario
You might want to merge this and the bug logged for opera 858246 as they are the same underlying issue -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 Title: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-st

[Bug 858246] Re: Software center cannot install opera deb file: Internal Error

2011-10-17 Thread ruario
The problem is that the data.tar file within the Opera Debian package is lzma compressed. Since /usr/bin/lzma is not present on Ubuntu "Oneiric Ocelot" 11.10, Software Center cannot open the file. However, other utilities such as dpkg and apt can open the package and install it without any issue b

[Bug 673127] Re: The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories

2010-11-09 Thread ruario
Pedro really? Testing in Firefox or Epiphany? -- The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@list

[Bug 673127] Re: The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories

2010-11-09 Thread ruario
You can also do the same in Epiphany once you set "Edit > Preferences > General" and uncheck "Automatically download and open files" -- The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 673127] Re: The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories

2010-11-09 Thread ruario
> Under these conditions Opera switches into the directory rather than overwriting the directory with a file. correction: Under these conditions the "KDE file selector" switches into the directory rather than overwriting the directory with a file. -- The Gtk file selector can silently overwite d

[Bug 673127] Re: The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories

2010-11-09 Thread ruario
It should be noted that it is not only Firefox. Other apps that use the Gtk file selector can do the same. For example I can also reproduce with Opera. It is also worth noting that if you run Opera under KDE, Opera will use the KDE file selector instead. Under these conditions Opera switches into

[Bug 673127] Re: The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories

2010-11-09 Thread ruario
-- The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

[Bug 673127] [NEW] The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories

2010-11-09 Thread ruario
Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: 1. Make a directory called /tmp/testdirectory 2. Start Firefox and enable the Gtk file selector for downloads, i.e. "Edit > Preferences > General > Download" and click "Always as me where to save files" 3. Navigate to a page where a file is available for

[Bug 594791] Re: openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori

2010-07-27 Thread ruario
Ok, for the record, I removed my workaround and updated my Ubuntu install. ldd'ing IcedTeaPlugin.so now results in no 'not found' lines and all of the installed browsers work with Java without any extra configuration. So yes, this is fixed for me as well. -- openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run o

[Bug 594791] Re: openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori

2010-07-27 Thread ruario
> No, what you are doing is plain wrong. if the symlink is needed, install the libsqlite0-dev package. but in the first place the browser you are using is wrong and should not rely on using the .so symlink. Please file a bug report for the browser. Actually you have just misunderstood me. I *never

[Bug 594791] Re: openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori

2010-07-27 Thread ruario
> > 3. libsqlite is not packaged correctly either. > > > is there more reason/evidence than the claim? >From my original comment, the fact that I need to do this: $ sudo ln -s /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so.0 /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so -- openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori

[Bug 594791] Re: openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori

2010-06-18 Thread ruario
Ok, it seems from this blog post that you can add Oracle Java from Lucid repository: http://www.chromedocs.net/2010/06/or-how-i-learned-to-stop-reading- bug.html However, I still think that many new and less experienced users will be very confused by this and wrongly interpret as some failing of

[Bug 594791] Re: openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori

2010-06-18 Thread ruario
I have exactly the same problem with Opera 10.60 Beta (the IcedTea plugin not working) and there seems to be three problems here: 1. The IcedTea plugin depends on some Mozilla components, meaning that you won't have a working Java plugin without these installed, which makes little sense if you d

[Bug 574436] Re: Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade

2010-05-03 Thread ruario
** Attachment added: "opera-removed-on-upgrade.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47546408/opera-removed-on-upgrade.png -- Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 574436] Re: Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade

2010-05-03 Thread ruario
** Attachment added: "third-party-sources.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47546382/third-party-sources.png -- Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 574436] Re: Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade

2010-05-03 Thread ruario
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47537832/Dependencies.txt -- Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 574436] [NEW] Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade

2010-05-03 Thread ruario
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Steps to reproduce: 1. Install opera via a .deb package downloaded from www.opera.com or snapshots.opera.com 2. Upgrade Ubuntu from 9.10 to 10.04 Expected result: Opera is installed and available to use. Actual result: Opera is marked

[Bug 489863] Re: When Opera is running then Ubuntu freezes down.

2009-12-18 Thread ruario
It is a bug in Opera and needs to be fixed in Opera. It could happen on any distro. :( ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Invalid -- When Opera is running then Ubuntu freezes down. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489863 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 489863] Re: When Opera is running then Ubuntu freezes down.

2009-12-18 Thread ruario
See: http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=336001 @Dan: The F1 (from your ctrl-alt-F1 to switch to your first virtual console) is being picked up by Gnome, after you kill Opera. -- When Opera is running then Ubuntu freezes down. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489863 You received thi