[Bug 61463] Re: Script that are using bash could be broken with the new symlink

2007-02-17 Thread nemti
No matter how many script devs you complain to, there is _always_ going to be a script that contains bashisms. If /bin/sh _absolutely_ has to point to dash, instead of refusing to run scripts with bashisms, why not do something constructive like scanning the script for bashisms, and then running it

[Bug 61463] Re: Script that are using bash could be broken with the new symlink

2007-01-25 Thread nemti
I agree that standards are important, however I don't feel this is the right way to go about things. User's are generally going to go for the easiest solution - which is either: - change sh to bash after several hours of googling - give up and switch distros (or even go back to Windows) -- Scri

[Bug 61463] Re: Script that are using bash could be broken with the new symlink

2007-01-24 Thread nemti
It's all well and good to say "you don't like it, you fix it yourself" which is exactly what I did within a day of upgrading. However, we're ones who are computer literate enough to actually work out what was happening. The majority of "human beings" that Ubuntu is _meant_ to be targeting are going

[Bug 61463] Re: Script that are using bash could be broken with the new symlink

2007-01-07 Thread nemti
"The overwhelming majority of Ubuntu users would almost never notice application installs running faster? I am serious. There are packages that take over a minute for post-install dpkg configuration, and dash speeds them up a LOT. It's the difference in spending 10 minutes or 30 minutes on dist-upg

[Bug 61463] Re: Script that are using bash could be broken with the new symlink

2006-12-13 Thread nemti
May I ask why the default shell was changed to dash in the first place? >From what I've seen, there doesn't seem to be any benefits apart from being faster (which IMHO isn't as important as running scripts properly). As I already said, I don't see why dash can't just be an option, and not a default

[Bug 61463] Re: Script that are using bash could be broken with the new symlink

2006-12-13 Thread nemti
> "The fact is in the majority of cases [dash] fails miserably" > This is what polite people call a falsehood, and what I call a lie. Ok, fine, perhaps a slight overstatement. I tried using dash, but it only took a few days before I started coming across broken scripts (which had previously worked

[Bug 61463] Re: Script that are using bash could be broken with the new symlink

2006-12-12 Thread nemti
Dash is terrible. The fact is in the majority of cases it fails miserably. Please change the default back to bash. -- Script that are using bash could be broken with the new symlink https://launchpad.net/bugs/61463 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.co