** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2119479
Title:
[SRU][P/N] mt7925: Wi-fi and Bluetooth FW update to 202507212329
** Description changed:
[SRU Justfication]
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2119479
These binary firmware changes are required to fix the following issues
(provided by vendor):
Release Note:
- Fix "PCIE AER: RxErr" issue
- Fix "probe request Supported Rates Listed tw
x-
firmware patch request until this kernel patch is accepted in the
generic and derivative kernels for all targeted releases.
[Other Info]
This update originates from a support request by Nvidia
** Affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mitchell A
There are some prerequisite patches (so far, in order):
lsblk: add ID-LINK column · util-linux/util-linux@ef7d50a
lsblk: make ID-LINK code more readable · util-linux/util-linux@e054895
lsblk: add ID column · util-linux/util-linux@875d6a3
Still searching for the rest
--
You received this bug n
cided
Assignee: Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Summary changed:
- lsblk: id column
Sounds good, I'll talk to Kuba. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115537
Title:
[SRU] gpgpu help text is unclear
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.laun
Thanks for uploading!
> Well, you should probably at least test that the expected help output
is shown, no?
Good point, I updated the test case.
> I will go ahead and upload the questing fix now, but what's your
thought on the SRUs exactly? Do you just want these staged in -proposed
so the next
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+git/wpa/+merge/489469
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2117180
Title:
wpa_supplicant DEFAU
** Changed in: wpa (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
** Changed in: wpa (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Hi all,
I was made aware of this today and want to make sure I understand the
conditions under which a given platform would attempt to connect to
these metadata endpoints.
Is it correct to say that this only ever happens if
/sys/class/dmi/id/product_name is non-existent on the machine? (and
thus,
Public bug reported:
SRU Justification:
[ Impact ]
In densely-populated areas with more than 200 Wi-Fi APs,
wpa_supplicant's default BSS_MAX_COUNT of 200 causes some nearby wi-fi
APs to only appear inconsistently.
In areas with more APs, setting a higher bss_max_count of 500 via
wpa_cli was suf
** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Plucky)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Oracular)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu
I've confirmed (via a manual download/install of the produced .debs from
the linked PPA pages) that the new help text is displayed when I run
`ubuntu-drivers -h`
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
PPAs:
J:
https://launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-drivers-gpgpu-help-jammy/+packages
N:
https://launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-drivers-gpgpu-help-noble/+packages
O,P:
https://launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-drivers-gpgpu-help-o
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/+git/ubuntu-drivers-common-1/+merge/488123
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/+git/ubuntu-drivers-common-1/+m
** Description changed:
Upstream patch: https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-drivers-
- common/commit/2a56dab2b4dc6fe4e4c38d1d865623d2f8f4a775
+ common/commit/2a56dab2b4dc6fe4e4c38d1d865623d2f8f4a775,
+ https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-drivers-
+ common/commit/a7231c0d4d2f14569870c862bd2a1954d
WIP in
https://git.launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
drivers-common/+git/ubuntu-drivers-common-1/refs/heads
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115537
Title:
[SRU] gp
** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115537
Title:
[SRU] gpgpu help text is unclear
To manage notifications
** Description changed:
Upstream patch: https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-drivers-
- common/pull/122/commits/426acc17d7d48d0ef603779d1cb9726e4478cd49
+ common/commit/2a56dab2b4dc6fe4e4c38d1d865623d2f8f4a775
SRU Justification:
[ Impact ]
The help text for the --gpgpu flag was imp
help text change
** Affects: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
--
You received t
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2093864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093864
Thanks Athos, indeed, this seems to be the same bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115222
T
> Note: we should also double-check how this behaves on
Noble/Oracular/Plucky.
I've observed the default network not being activated automatically in
Plucky as well.
Is somebody else already working on SRUing this fix into Plucky?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Public bug reported:
With libvirt 11.0.0-2ubuntu6, `virsh start` on a fresh instance / fresh
libvirt installation will fail due to the default libvirt network not
being started by default on Plucky.
This is easily worked around by running `virsh net-autostart default`
and `virsh net-start default
Verified - with this kernel installed on a DGH H100 with Plucky host and
guest, I see a 30 second boot time post-ram-alloc, and the GPUs are
usable without any modifications to kernel cli or ovmf parameters.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-plucky-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-plucky-
** Description changed:
+ For Ubuntu 24.04 users facing this issue - please see this related bug
+ report for a workaround to achieve much faster VM boots with large GPU
+ passthrough: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/2101903
+
+ (The fix in *this* bug report reduced the slowne
(for ubuntu-bugcontrol)
I would triage this as a "High" importance bug, since it breaks the build of a
heavily used coreutil. I would not mark it critical since it is a build-time
issue that would not cause any persistent issues with existing deployments.
--
You received this bug notification b
(for ubuntu-bugcontrol)
I would triage this as a "Low" importance bug, since this is how I treated it
during development. This was based on it only being impactful for a subset of
ipmitool's functionality on a few platforms that were not heavily used at the
time, and since our partner was OK wit
(for ubuntu-bugcontrol)
I would triage this as a "Wishlist" importance bug, since it is a user request
for new functionality in openvpn that would just make the user flow more
obvious - but the bug doesn't actually result in any degradation of the
underlying service.
--
You received this bug n
** Description changed:
+ For Ubuntu 24.04 users facing this issue - please see this related bug
+ report for a workaround to achieve much faster VM boots with large GPU
+ passthrough: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/2101903
+
SRU Justification:
[ Impact ]
VM guest
Can confirm this impacts me as well (only on Jammy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2113797
Title:
cloud-init 25.1.2 on Jammy not running on VM boot, systemd services
disabled
To ma
My test of the new functionality in OVMF 2024.02-2ubuntu0.4 also worked
as expected on Noble on DGX H100, and I observed no regressions in my
control tests:
Control test 1 (no custom X-PciMmio64Mb):
1. Started a VM with 4 GPUs passed-through without specifying a custom
opt/ovmf/X-PciMmio64Mb or p
Nvidia has verified that the version in proposed looks good. They also
confirmed by inspection that, once uncompressed, the md5sums of: md5sum *.bin
dd4409652a8ec3f3b892fc5edbd802c3 BT_RAM_CODE_MT7925_1_1_hdr.bin
c34616746a9df28d52ec72c51520fa64 WIFI_MT7925_PATCH_MCU_1_1_hdr.bin
0a4c8e39de5cb8b
Verification for edk2 (2024.02-2ubuntu0.4):
All autopkgtests that failed for Noble ovmf 2024.02-2ubuntu0.4 passed
after a re-run.
My test of the new functionality worked as expected on Noble on DGX
A100, and I observed no regressions in my control tests:
Control test 1 (no custom X-PciMmio64Mb):
Nvidia will verify that the -proposed version works with the new
functionality as expected internally.
I can at least confirm that I don't see any regressions in the the
values in the power table on a similar SKU, and that are aligned with
those provided in MediaTek's example (for EHT26, EHT52, E
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+git/edk2-2/+merge/486539
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101903
Title:
Backport "OvmfPk
Rebased onto security fix in ubuntu0.3 version and resubmitted for
Noble:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+git/edk2-2/+merge/486539
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
This is still an issue with our runners with Ubuntu 24.04[0].
[0] - https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuda-
quantum/actions/runs/15395934211/job/43318758833
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20967
For tracking purposes - this should be triaged with medium importance,
since it has a notable performance impact on virtual machines, but does
not otherwise impact their functionality
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
Additional test coverage: Nvidia confirmed today that they are also
seeing the desired faster boot time with this ovmf in noble-proposed,
with the described VM configuration changes applied.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
** Description changed:
SRU Justification:
[ Impact ]
Due to an inefficiency in the way older host kernels manage pfnmaps for
guest VM memory ranges[1], guests with large-BAR GPUs passed through
have a very long (multiple minutes) initialization time when the MMIO
window advertis
This should target the Plucky kernel, and should be triaged with medium
importance, since it has a notable performance impact on virtual
machines, but does not otherwise impact their functionality.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
/2101903
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New =&
** Description changed:
- Upstream patch:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/10856/commits/f8a8bb717c53c651750025aefaa5654f383bd02e
- (To be added to Plucky via Debian)
+ Upstream patch:
+
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/10856/commits/f8a8bb717c53c651750025aefaa5654f383bd02e
SRU
** Description changed:
Upstream patch:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/10856/commits/f8a8bb717c53c651750025aefaa5654f383bd02e
(To be added to Plucky via Debian)
SRU Justification:
[ Impact ]
Due to an inefficiency in the way older host kernels manage pfnmaps for
guest
All autopkgtests that failed for Noble passed after a re-run.
Additionally, I ran the same verification on H100 as I did last night
for the A100.
My test of the new functionality worked as expected on Noble on DGX
H100, and I observed no regressions in my control tests:
Control test 1 (no custom
jammy-proposed kernel verified to fix bug on DGX H100:
I am seeing the boot time improvement on 2/2 tests (the time between
virsh start finishing and the boot reaching Host and Network Name
Lookups is down to 1:30, from 2:30 on the old kernel), GPU driver works,
and the timing of the console outpu
Marking this as verified for Noble -
My test of the new functionality worked as expected on Noble on DGX
A100, and I observed no regressions in my control tests:
Control test 1 (no custom X-PciMmio64Mb):
1. Started a VM with 4 GPUs passed-through without specifying a custom
opt/ovmf/X-PciMmio64M
I ran the migration-reference/0 autopkgtest trigger on both impacted
tests, and they failed in the same way as well:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/c/ceilometer/noble/amd64
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/c/ceilometer/oracular/s390x
So I think we can conclude this failure is unre
Regarding the amd64/noble and s390x/oracular ceilometer autopkgtest regression
reports:
They both look to be failing due to ceilometer-agent-compute here:
136s A dependency job for ceilometer-agent-compute.service failed. See
'journalctl -xe' for details.
136s autopkgtest [22:06:24]: test test-se
** Description changed:
Upstream patch:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/10856/commits/f8a8bb717c53c651750025aefaa5654f383bd02e
(To be added to Plucky via Debian)
SRU Justification:
[ Impact ]
Due to an inefficiency in the way older host kernels manage pfnmaps for
guest
** Description changed:
[Impact]
A new 24.10 minor version has been released from upstream, and should be
backported under the HWE exception. This also allow to backport various
fixes to the packaging.
It was tested using a Noble PPA because the real hardware is available
in Nobl
** Description changed:
[Impact]
A new 24.10 minor version has been released from upstream, and should be
backported under the HWE exception. This also allow to backport various
fixes to the packaging.
It was tested using a Noble PPA because the real hardware is available
in Nobl
Hi,
I have linked the branches for the remaining series and tagged ubuntu-sponsors
to request an upload/sponsorship.
Nvidia has verified that PPAs for each work to resolve the issue (which
requires specialized hardware), and I have not observed any regressions in
`ipmitool sel elist`.
Oracular
Thank you!
I just submitted the Noble version of this SRU here and subscribed
ubuntu-sponsors to it:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+git/edk2/+merge/485866
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+git/edk2/+m
@juergh They provided an example, which I added as an attachment
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2109796
Title:
[SRU][O/N] Support Wi-fi and Bluetooth for Nvidia DGX Spark Platform
To
Mediatek-provided example of how to test the patch functionality
** Description changed:
[SRU Justfication]
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2109796
These binary firmware changes are required for full Wifi and Bluetooth
functionality on DGX Spark
[Impact]
Lack of s
@juergh, MediaTek was able to provide a more specific test case. I've
added the details to the description.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2109796
Title:
[SRU][O/N] Support Wi-fi and
Yeah, that would be nice.
> they're likely not able to really test that (with a reasonable
effort). At the minimum they should verify that they can still establish
Wifi and BT connections with the updated blobs.
Should I just add this to the test section of this bug report, in that
case, and we c
Hi Jürg,
Nvidia provided me with some more background on the patch's specific
purpose that I've added to the impact section. I'll ask if they can
provide any more specificity on how they will test to validate this
patch as well.
** Description changed:
[SRU Justfication]
BugLink: https://
** Changed in: ipmitool (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ipmitool (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ipmitool (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Marking this as verified -
My test of the new functionality worked as expected on DGX H100, and I
observed no regressions in my control tests:
Control test 1 (no custom X-PciMmio64Mb):
1. Started a VM with 4 GPUs passed-through without specifying a custom
opt/ovmf/X-PciMmio64Mb or pci=realloc pc
Nvidia QA verified that this patch resolves their issue as expected, and
I did not observe any `ipmitool sel elist` regressions on my DUT, so I
have marked it as verified. Thanks!
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-plucky
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-plu
** Changed in: edk2 (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101903
Title:
Backport "OvmfPkg: Use user-specified opt/ovmf/X-PciMmio64Mb value
** Changed in: ipmitool (Ubuntu Plucky)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
** Changed in: ipmitool (Ubuntu Oracular)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
** Changed in: ipmitool (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) =>
ble)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Oracular)
** Summary changed:
- [SRU][P/O/N] Support Wi-fi and Bluetooth for Nvidia DGX Spark Platform
+ [SRU][O/N] Support Wi-fi and Bluetooth for Nvidia DGX Spark Platform
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
** Description changed:
[SRU Justfication]
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2109796
These binary firmware changes are required for full Wifi and Bluetooth
functionality on DGX Spark
-
[Impact]
Lack of some WiFi and Bluetooth functionality on Nvidia DGX Spark
plat
update originates from a support request by Nvidia
** Affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
Status: In Progress
** Description changed:
[SRU Justfication]
- BugLink: X
+ These binary firmware changes are required
RE: cryptsetup and initramfs-tools autoppkgtests:
These failed tests all passed after I requested re-runs. Based on the
logs, it seems the failures were only due to unrelated test machine
timeouts.
cryptsetup/2:2.7.2-2ubuntu1 (ppc64el) pass:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/run/04ec53b4-d13e-434c-
Thank you Andreas! I will test that as soon as I can once it lands in
proposed, and then once it gets released to Oracular, I will follow up
again by re-subscribing ubuntu-sponsors and targeting the patch to
noble-devel as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
t be any known impacts to users running officially
supported Ubuntu kernels, though.
** Affects: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu)
Assignee:
> What else? Nothing should change for non-nvidia users who do not fall
into category (a) above?
Correct, to the best of my knowledge.
> How obvious is the fix for case (a), if it happens? Is there a log
message that would give a hint?
The user would see many log messages in dmesg indicating tha
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097389
Title:
VM boots slowly with large-BAR GPU Passthrough due to pci/probe.c
MP submitted:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+git/ipmitool/+merge/484252
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076173
Title:
cannot display sensor name
> the outcome quoted below is awesome
Thanks @Andreas! :)
> Some parameter was considered a lower limit before, and now it's no
longer a lower limit.
Correct. Without my patch, if a user sets opt/ovmf/X-PciMmio64Mb, that
value is only used if it is *higher* than the value that
PlatformDynamicMmi
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+git/ipmitool/+merge/484252
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076173
Title:
cannot dis
** Description changed:
SRU Justification:
[ Impact ]
ipmitool sel does not correctly display the sensor's name if its owner is set
to lun1.
Upstream bug: https://codeberg.org/IPMITool/ipmitool/issues/8
We were asked to track this in order to enable new hardware from a partner.
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+
+ [ Impact ]
+
ipmitool sel does not correctly display the sensor's name if its owner is set
to lun1.
Upstream bug: https://codeberg.org/IPMITool/ipmitool/issues/8
We were asked to track this in order to enable new hardware from a partner.
** Changed in: ipmitool (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => In Progress
** Changed in: ipmitool (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks for sponsoring, Lukas!
Yes, I will prepare an MP and PPA for Noble as well. (I have also
previously verified that it works well on Noble, FWIW.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21
MP submitted for Oracular SRU request:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+git/edk2/+merge/483529
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101903
Title:
Backport
I just verified that this patch works as expected on Oracular on H100.
This can be tested with this PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~mitchellaugustin/+archive/ubuntu/edk2-honor-user-
mmio-window-oracular/+packages
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: edk2 (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101903
Title:
Backport "OvmfPkg: Use user-specified opt/ovmf/X-PciMmio64Mb valu
Hi John,
Versions of OVMF in Jammy and earlier do not contain
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/ecb778d0ac62560aa172786ba19521f27bc3f650,
and as a result, there is no need for users to force a smaller
opt/ovmf/X-PciMmio64Mb on those releases when passing through a large
BAR GPU since the de
Reassigning to @dannf since the next step is to pull this into Debian,
then Plucky
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+
+ [ Impact ]
+
Due to an inefficiency in the way older host kernels manage pfnmaps for
guest VM memory ranges[0], guests with large-BAR GPUs passed through
hav
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/10856 accepted upstream. Per
conversation with @dannf, this will be pulled into Debian, then be SRU'd
from Plucky once it lands there.
** Changed in: edk2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Upstream suggested a slightly different approach, which should still be
acceptable for our use case:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/10856
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101903
Patch refactored, verified, and submitted to upstream edk2 project:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/10853
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101903
Title:
UBUNTU: SAUCE: Introduce
Thanks @dannf, I will refactor as suggested and take this upstream to
see if they are interested.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101903
Title:
UBUNTU: SAUCE: Introduce X-PciMmioClass
Marked as 'confirmed', as this issue was originally reported to us by a
partner and has been verified by several others in the source threads.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101903
Tit
Draft of patch (git), based on applied/ubuntu/noble-updates @
16f6f1e6a117da8d86dc29829c28877a78cd3834
** Patch added:
"0001-UBUNTU-SAUCE-Add-X-PciMmioClassicWindow-fw_cfg-optio.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/2101903/+attachment/5863834/+files/0001-UBUNTU-SAUCE-Add
Draft of patch (for debian/patches), just for reference
** Attachment added: "Add-X-PciMmioClassicWindow-option-to-fw_cfg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/2101903/+attachment/5863833/+files/Add-X-PciMmioClassicWindow-option-to-fw_cfg
--
You received this bug notification
I'm working on cleaning up this patch now and will send it shortly, but
I have confirmed that the approach works as desired.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101903
Title:
UBUNTU: SAUC
thub.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/ecb778d0ac62560aa172786ba19521f27bc3f650
[4]: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/109651206?p=Created,,,20,1,0,0
** Affects: edk2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: edk2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (un
oracular-proposed kernel verified to fix bug on DGX H100
** Tags removed: verification-needed-oracular-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-oracular-linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
-proposed kernel verified to fix bug on DGX H100
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-noble-linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097389
Ti
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089113
Title:
Keyboard backlight controls do not work on Asus ROG Zephyrus G
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089113
Title:
Keyboard backlight controls do not work on Asus ROG Zephyrus GA
Upstream patch submitted to kernel-team list with subject
[SRU][N/O][PATCH 0/1] PCI: Batch BAR sizing operations
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097389
Title:
VM boots slowly with lar
-uyp07fgm6t1ozqkqadsa5jrzo0reneyzgqzub4mdrr...@mail.gmail.com/
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mitchell Augustin (mitchellaugustin)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance
1 - 100 of 2325 matches
Mail list logo
