Actually zfs-2.0.2-1ubuntu5, zfs-kmod-2.0.3-8ubuntu5.
I'm not sure who to create corruption, but I have plenty of it causing
processes to kernel panic. https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/11474
contains some instructions on how to create a corrupted file using wine.
Even after this fixed zfs hi
Does the fact that this is an encrypted pool have any impact on this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931660
Title:
PANIC at zfs_znode.c:339:zfs_znode_sa_init()
To manage notificatio
Downgrading these libraries did not fix it for me.
One canary is to look at the state of the updatedb.mlocate process which
goes into live hang as it hits the file that is currently faulty. Thus
for example:
2728 ?DNs0:01 /usr/bin/updatedb.mlocate
Using lsof one can find out which
Actually zfs-2.0.2-1ubuntu5, zfs-kmod-2.0.3-8ubuntu5.
I'm not sure who to create corruption, but I have plenty of it causing
processes to kernel panic. https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/11474
contains some instructions on how to create a corrupted file using wine.
Even after this fixed zfs hi
Is there a way to clear the corruption without having to do a fresh
install? This bug is crippling me on hirsuite, kernel 5.13.0-12.
zfs-2.0.2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906476
Ti
Norbert, ping. It sounds you were so close.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888797
Title:
missing luahbtex
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ub
Daer Norbert,
> > Thank you Norbert. That would be great. I think your running the PPA
> > would be a far better solution.
>
> Fine with me! I could help the Ubuntu people also for their versions,
> but I don't **run** for them. If they would ask ...
Sure.
> Hmmm, the page I linked
>
>
I do notice I and fighting with /usr/local/lib leakage into my build.
Thank you Norbert. That would be great. I think your running the PPA
would be a far better solution.
The current (2019) version is 2019.20190605.51237-3build2 in the main
repo
So might I suggest 2020.20200327.54578-4~ubuntu20.
Thanks. Yes, it would be great if texlive 2020 was in Ubuntu 20.04. But
I doubt it will happen given the feature packages for 20.04 are fixed
now.
I downloaded texlive-bin 2020 and tried to debuild. But I have harfbuzz
2.6.4 and there seems to be some mismatch in xetex over whether
harfbuzz-icu is
Public bug reported:
I'm trying to install luahbtex. texlive-luatex implies it includes the
corresponding luahbtex CTAN package, but the only filename containing
the characters hb, installed by texlive-luatex is man1/luahbtex.1.gz
which makes no reference to luahbtex within it.
Yours, wanting to
Public bug reported:
As released to 18.10, claws-mail 3.16 fails to include the fancy plugin
(or is that claws-mail-extras, it's all the same source package). 3.16
has fixed the fancy rendering problem. All that needs to happen is that
it be built for ubuntu. The required build dependency is libwe
Still a problem in 4.4.0-34
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603845
Title:
kernel 4.4.0-31 install broken
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun
When I ran the test, I got not failure. But I did notice that when I ran
the test using valgrind (still with no failure) valgrind reported a
number of memory problems in python3.4. No errors were reported from
anywhere in gtk or lower (pango, graphite, etc.). The command I used to
test was:
valgri
In addition. If this is a memory corruption bug, is running the test
under valgrind of any use?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303516
Title:
ubiquity crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_mal
A couple of initial queries:
Is there any way we can find out what the font was that was being
initialised when the crash occurred? I ask because if the font isn't a
graphite font, then what was causing a graphite font to try to be
created? Looking at the input text being Burmese, I'll assume it's
In keeping with a similar bug #890779, I am assuming this is a
udisks/udev issue. But the encryption aspect and the inability for it to
take down the lvm to release the encryption may be from somewhere else.
** Package changed: ubuntu => udisks (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification beca
still present in saucy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890779
Title:
btrfs mounts in raid1 are shown twice
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu
Public bug reported:
I created a luks encrypted partition on an external drive, and put lvm
with a single group and two volumes into the partition. I then used
mkfs.btrfs to create a raid1 (-d raid1 -m raid1) mirror of the two lvm
volume devices. After rebooting (yes, it's that bad) and plugging i
pango-graphite and its dependent libgraphite3 should be removed from any
dependencies and from the repos. The replacement (libgraphite2-3, yeh I
know it's a funny order) integrates with harfbuzz-ng. I'm assuming that
pango uses harfbuzz rather than its own shaping modules now?
I don't know the pro
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: trang
trang seems to be built wrongly:
On jaunty.
When run I get this error:
trang lift.rng lift.xsd
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.relaxng.datatype.helpers.DatatypeLibraryLoader$Service$Loader2.getResources(libgcj_b
kernel 2.6.24-16, dell d620, iwl3945 v 1.2.0, dmesg output as given
above with microcode failure. Installed linux-backports-
modules-2.6.24-16-generic from main binary repositorty and dmesg reports
iwl3945 v 1.2.5. Still with the same microcode error. The md5sums for
the microcode are no different
Public bug reported:
running pdebuild without --debbuildopts results in an empty DEBBUILDOPTS
and so pbuilder is run with an empty --debuildopts parameter and trys to
take the following .dsc file resulting in there being no required .dsc
reference on the pbuilder command line.
ProblemType: Bug
Ar
22 matches
Mail list logo
