** Summary changed:
- fstat fail on nfs4 mounted filesystem
+ fstat fails on nfs4 mounted filesystem (aka tar Cannot utime: Invalid
argument)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820499
Ti
s/ftime/fstat/g sorry
** Description changed:
On Ubuntu 18.04-lts with hwe kernel, It seems that fstat() syscall on a nfs4
mounted filesystem reports wrong atime value. This issue is faced uncompressing
a simple tar file.
Instead, mounting the same share as nfs3 all works fine.
I tried al
Verbose strace of tar -zxf test.tar.gz on NFS4 (failing ftime syscall)
** Attachment added: "Verbose strace of tar -zxf test.tar.gz on NFS4 (failing
ftime syscall)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta-hwe/+bug/1820499/+attachment/5246996/+files/test.strace.tar.nfs4.txt
--
Y
Verbose strace of tar -zxf test.tar.gz on NFS3 (working ftime syscall)
** Attachment added: "Verbose strace of tar -zxf test.tar.gz on NFS3 (working
ftime syscall)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta-hwe/+bug/1820499/+attachment/5246997/+files/test.strace.tar.nfs3.txt
--
Y
Testing tar archive.
** Attachment removed: "Same tar zxf mounting the filesystem as NFS3"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta-hwe/+bug/1820499/+attachment/5246980/+files/tar.nfs.strace
** Attachment removed: "Failing tar zxf on NFS4 mounted fs"
https://bugs.launchpad.net
tar output on NFS4 filesystem (failing utime)
** Attachment added: "tar output on NFS4 filesystem (failing utime)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta-hwe/+bug/1820499/+attachment/5246995/+files/test.tar.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
** Attachment added: "Same tar zxf mounting the filesystem as NFS3"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta-hwe/+bug/1820499/+attachment/5246980/+files/tar.nfs.strace
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
Public bug reported:
On Ubuntu 18.04-lts with hwe kernel, It seems that fstat() syscall on a nfs4
mounted filesystem reports wrong atime value. This issue is faced uncompressing
a simple tar file.
Instead, mounting the same share as nfs3 all works fine.
I tried all on a ubuntu 19.04(beta) and al
Same issue on 18.04 (beta)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1710862
Title:
Synaptics s3203 touchpad on Dell XPS12-9Q33 has no working buttons
after recent upgrade
To manage notificat
Please compile samba with dbus support (you need to add libdbus-1-dev
package to enable this).
best regards,
luigi
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572950
Title:
snapper.so not inclu
Public bug reported:
Hi,
the snapper.so vfs module is still not included into samba-vfs-module.
This module is useful to manage btrfs snapshot via snapper utility.
Best regards,
luigi
** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notifica
Same here.
ciao
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002363
Title:
12.04 remmina full screen closes unexpectedly
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
of course... fakeroot:i386 and fakeroot:x86_64 cannot be installed at
the same time...
best regards
luigi
** Changed in: fakeroot (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
** Changed in: fakeroot (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918373
Title:
Unable to use fakeroot 1.18 on 32bit executable (x86_64 ubuntu)
To manage
I forced the fakeroot:i386, solving the issue.
sorry for the noise on the air
best regards,
luigi
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918373
Title:
Unable to use fakeroot 1.18 on 32bit
See Bug #571091 (missing 32bit libraries)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918373
Title:
Unable to use fakeroot 1.18 on 32bit executable (x86_64 ubuntu)
To manage notifications about t
the multilib support should be fine to solve these issues.
** Summary changed:
- Unable to use fakeroot 1.18 on 32bit executable (x86_64 debian)
+ Unable to use fakeroot 1.18 on 32bit executable (x86_64 ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Public bug reported:
I'm trying to use fakeroot on a 32bit executable in my 64bit environment
obtaining the following message:
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libfakeroot-sysv.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
preloaded: ignored.
The issue is faced using Ubuntu Precise 12.04 with package
fakeroot-1.18-2.
I h
I agree with Bremm. I think that is a prelink problem.
best regards,
luigi
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/759661
Title:
Skype distro package segmentation fault (official package wor
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libx11-data
The file XKeysymDB is missing. This causes problems with (old) lesstif
applications.
** Affects: libx11 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: lesstif x11
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
I noticed that libgcal requires libcurl4-gnutls-dev, while akonadi-
googledata requires libcurl4-openssl-dev instead. Can it be a library
issue?
ciao
luigi
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
same problem here
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371178
Title:
pinentry-qt4 doesn't prompt for a password when trying to read an
encrypted email in Kmail
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
>From mandriva src repo:
http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/x11-driver-
video-psb/current/SOURCES/
--
Acer Aspire One ZA3 Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 does not recognise the monitor
(unknown), only a resolution of 1025x768 os available with a refresh rate of
0Hz, options are unab
sorry for the spam...
this is another link: http://community.edc.intel.com/t5/Software-Tools-
Discussions/Xorg-1-7-Support/td-p/2535
we need to wait for next release.
ciao
luigi
--
Acer Aspire One ZA3 Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 does not recognise the monitor
(unknown), only a resolution of 1025x768
you are right.
sorry, I haven't noticed this detail :)
luigi
--
Acer Aspire One ZA3 Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 does not recognise the monitor
(unknown), only a resolution of 1025x768 os available with a refresh rate of
0Hz, options are unable to be altered
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553898
You r
http://www.nanoant.com/linux/compiling-kernel-iegd-10x-module-for-any-
linux-distribution
It seems that iegd 10.3 supports gma500:
http://edc.intel.com/Software/Downloads/IEGD/#compatibility
(see US15W, US15WP and US15WPT)
ciao
luigi
--
Acer Aspire One ZA3 Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 does not recogni
what about the iegd 10.3? I'm a little confused, is the iegd10.3 able to
support the gma500?
thanks for any answer.
luigi
--
Acer Aspire One ZA3 Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 does not recognise the monitor
(unknown), only a resolution of 1025x768 os available with a refresh rate of
0Hz, options are unab
I confirm that the last upstart 0.6.3-3 solves the issue for me.
thanks and best regards
luigi
--
karmic boot hung after /scripts/init-bottom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430272
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
I already upgrade a lot of times my system without success and the
problem still remain. I will try to upgrade tomorrow hoping to solve the
problem.
best regards,
luigi
--
karmic boot hung after /scripts/init-bottom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430272
You received this bug notification becau
Hi All,
Can sombody tell me what is wrong in the upstart package and how i can
fix? I cannot reinstall again the machine and would like to continue to
use the karmic.
best regards,
luigi
--
karmic boot hung after /scripts/init-bottom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430272
You received this bug
30 matches
Mail list logo
