[Bug 1780838] Re: FTBFS on armhf due to alignment problem

2018-08-13 Thread dormando
almost all of the changes inbetween 1.5.6 and 1.5.10 are in seccomp or extstore, neither of which ubuntu enables. even then, the rest are all bugfixes or buildfixes or ARM fixes. there is one important SASL fix that went into 1.5.9ish that would be great to stick into 18.04, so if at all possible

[Bug 1780838] Re: FTBFS on armhf due to alignment problem

2018-08-10 Thread dormando
1.5.10 is released. I hope we can all agree to ship it :) Thanks again for your patience. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780838 Title: FTBFS on armhf due to alignment problem To ma

[Bug 1780838] Re: FTBFS on armhf due to alignment problem

2018-08-08 Thread dormando
okay: the 'next' branch now has this change merged in (I couldn't find any problem with it and re-ran the tests on the rpi3 a hundred times). I also include something that should appease flush-all.t for now. If this passes all your builds I'll be stamping it as 1.5.10 immediately. thanks! -- Yo

[Bug 1780838] Re: FTBFS on armhf due to alignment problem

2018-08-08 Thread dormando
the i386 failure should be transient. think I can see how that would happen, and can make it less likely by just bumping the sleep, since if this test is running on a single core bad prioritization could have the internal timer fail to update in time. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1780838] Re: FTBFS on armhf due to alignment problem

2018-08-08 Thread dormando
did i386 fail with 1.5.9 or is this only with the patch? I don't understand why flush-all.t would fail, it doesn't use the modified code at all -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780838 Ti

[Bug 1780838] Re: FTBFS on armhf due to alignment problem

2018-08-08 Thread dormando
1.5.7 contained another ARM fix: https://github.com/memcached/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes157 Also 1.5.9 is current, now. there's one important segfault fix for binprot. thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 1780838] Re: FTBFS on armhf due to alignment problem

2018-08-07 Thread dormando
https://github.com/memcached/memcached/pull/416 can you try this branch, please? I need to audit it twice and clean it up a little bit, but the tests now pass on my rpi3. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 1753839] Re: memcached deadlock fixed in 1.5.5

2018-03-09 Thread dormando
> Thank you for your input. I think you're the current upstream > maintainer? Your opinion is valued here. Yup, I am. > > The removal of the systemd bits were because of compat issues across > > different systemd versions. The changes for the spec file (instancing > > support & rpm build improvem

[Bug 1753839] Re: memcached deadlock fixed in 1.5.5

2018-03-08 Thread dormando
The extstore changes are only affected if built with --enable-extstore, which I don't think you do (and I would not recommend yet). The removal of the systemd bits were because of compat issues across different systemd versions. The changes for the spec file (instancing support & rpm build improve

[Bug 1753839] [NEW] memcached deadlock fixed in 1.5.5

2018-03-06 Thread dormando
Public bug reported: I see that 1.5.4 looks to be frozen for 18.04. Debian upstream said they were pulling in 1.5.6 soon, but in case you can't update I want to ensure this deadlock issue is patched. https://github.com/memcached/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes155 https://github.com/memcached/memcach