--- Comment From niran...@in.ibm.com 2025-01-15 00:58 EDT---
Thanks for the update @sergiodj.
So, could we expect the release around Jan 25th 2025 ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
--- Comment From niran...@in.ibm.com 2025-01-12 23:56 EDT---
Hi sergiodj,
Is the SRU stage passed ?
Do we have any update on the release date ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
--- Comment From amit.machhi...@ibm.com 2025-01-10 11:12 EDT---
(In reply to comment #49)
> Hi Amit,
> so far we faild to recreate this case, neither on ppc64el nor on a different
> platform.
>
> So first of all the recommendation (and to unblock in such cases) is still
> the workaround men
--- Comment From amit.machhi...@ibm.com 2025-01-10 01:00 EDT---
Are there any further updates on this issue?
Thanks,
Amit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080474
Title:
ubuntu
--- Comment From niran...@in.ibm.com 2025-01-08 23:40 EDT---
@sergiodj - Thanks for the update.
May we know by when would the fix be released ?
We have a release pending due to this fix.
Also, is there any way for us to verify the new qemu package ?
I do not see it marked here -
https://
--- Comment From pranj...@in.ibm.com 2025-01-08 03:44 EDT---
May I know when it will be available with Noble?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091099
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.04] OS g
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2076587 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076587
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2025-01-08 00:43 EDT---
Thank you so much for the explanation Frank. I will check and take action
accordingly!
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** T
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2076587 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076587
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2025-01-07 02:22 EDT---
distro, any update on this bug?
Is the patch upstreamed already or still in discussion phase?
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment From d.herrendoer...@de.ibm.com 2024-12-17 11:52 EDT---
@sergiodj
did the MP go through ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091099
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.04] OS guest bo
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
lftp: buffer overflow detected when accessing z/VM FTP server and changing the
directory
---uname output---
Linux lnxzvmd1 6.11.0-9-generic #9-Ubuntu SMP Mon Oct 14 12:18:15 UTC 2024
s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux
---Steps to Reproduce---
1. Conne
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "Core Dump"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091440/+attachment/5844002/+files/core
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received th
--- Comment From d.herrendoer...@de.ibm.com 2024-12-09 10:26 EDT---
A fix was posted by the maintainer on qemu-devel
diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h b/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
index 51c94b0116..95ee4da9bd 100644
--- a/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
+++ b/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
@@ -177,20 +177,27 @@ again:
return -1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083131
--- Comment From jre...@de.ibm.com 2024-12-09 04:18 EDT---
I have successfully verified that printf of floats now works fine on s390x with
the fixed bash package from oracular-proposed:
Verificatio
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-12-05 07:22 EDT---
This bug was already detected in Jammy and was fixed in Ubuntu 22.04 (package
qemu - 1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.21)
==> see bugzilla / LP item 'Bug 206380 - LP2065579 : [UBUNTU 22.04] OS guest
boot issues on 9p filesystem'
Now, the
Public bug reported:
== Reported by - 2024-12-04 ==
---Problem Description---
[UBUNTU 24.04] OS guest boot issues on 9p filesystem
---uname output---
Linux winlnxnw 6.8.0-45-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 30 11:09:37 UTC 2024
s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux
Contact Information = d.herrendoer...
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2076147 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076147
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-12-03 01:10 EDT---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I tried the below scenarios as mentioned by Kautuk, i already updated Kautuk
> regarding this!
>
> Steps for 1
--- Comment From amit.machhi...@ibm.com 2024-12-02 03:12 EDT---
Hi Frank,
Sorry for the late reply. Please find the information below:
(In reply to comment #44)
> Now trying to find some differences in the systems,
> you already shared the lsblk output in comment #26.
>
> Would you mind a
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-12-02 00:53 EDT---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Hi fheimes!
>
> I have done the testing with macvtap bridge and this scenario is also
> working fine!
>
> HOST[SOURCE](MDC):
> OS : ubuntu
> Kernel: 6.8.0-48-generic
> qemu : QEMU emulator version 8.2.2
--- Comment From eduard.ste...@ibm.com 2024-11-29 03:32 EDT---
Hi,
so i have a patch for gzip that will fix the problem. Unfortunately my
Copyright Assignment is still processed by the FSF. Until then i cannot
send patches in. Ilja and I will figure out a way to make the patch
available.
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-11-26 01:36 EDT---
I had verified the patch earlier on 6.8.0-48-generic kernel(comment #26) and
the issue was still reproducible. The reason turned out to be the
"CONFIG_KFENCE" which was set to 'y' for all the architecture on Ubuntu.
Is that
--- Comment From iranna.an...@in.ibm.com 2024-11-25 01:26 EDT---
(In reply to comment #44)
> Now trying to find some differences in the systems,
> you already shared the lsblk output in comment #26.
>
> Would you mind also sharing the output of:
> multipath -ll
> lscpu
> and
> lsmem
> ?
>
>
--- Comment From vajai...@in.ibm.com 2024-11-21 00:37 EDT---
*** Bug 210706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077722
Title:
[Ubun
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2204
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072641
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] KVM: s390: unhandled guest LPSWEY instruc
--- Comment From anushree.math...@ibm.com 2024-11-11 04:01 EDT---
Hi fheimes,
Thanks for the reply! I tried upgrading the qemu to
qemu-system=1:8.2.2+ds-0ubuntu1.4 and this cpu hotplug scenario is working as
expected! Here is my analysis:
HOST DETAILS:
kernel: 6.8.0-48-generic
qemu: QEMU
--- Comment From anushree.math...@ibm.com 2024-11-08 03:45 EDT---
Hi fheimes,
I tried the exact same steps but the qemu is not upgrading to the
version qemu-system=1:8.2.2+ds-0ubuntu1.3.
Steps i tried:
1) sudo add-apt-repository -y "deb http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/
$(lsb_release
--- Comment From gautam.mengh...@ibm.com 2024-11-08 08:51 EDT---
The fix has made it to linux-next
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=a373830f96db288a3eb43a8692b6bcd0bd88dfe1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-11-08 08:22 EDT---
I don't think it's supposed to be stable. Different zlib versions or
implementations (zlib-ng, for example) will produce different encodings, even
without the accelerator and even for the same compression level. I'm not an
apport d
--- Comment From eduard.ste...@ibm.com 2024-11-08 06:10 EDT---
indeed the problem is that the ibm unzip function dfltcc_inflate and gzip own
function gzip_inflate differ in behavior.
gzip_inflate will flush its output buffers in many more cases, where
dfltcc_inflate is much stricter about
--- Comment From ulrich.weig...@de.ibm.com 2024-11-06 11:04 EDT---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > libunwind could be enabled for s390x as well
>
> are you sure?
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/libunwind/docs/index.rst
> it isn't listed here
This table seems outdated, support
Public bug reported:
Currently the C++ exception handling support is disabled for s390x when
building libc++/libc++abi packages:
ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),s390x))
STAGE_ALL_CMAKE_EXTRA += -DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=s390x-linux-gnu
LIBCXX_EXCEPTIONS := OFF
However, this is supposed to work on
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-11-04 17:56 EDT---
This was not an easy one - so let me thank everyone for all your work and
contributions!
Withe the release to jammy -updates, we can now close this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-11-04 17:50 EDT---
With the qemu part being released to jammy -updates, we can now close this bug.
==> Changing the status to: CLOSED
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2304
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2204
--
You received this bug no
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-11-04 17:46 EDT---
Thanks everyone for all your work!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959966
Title:
[23.04 FEAT] KVM: Secure Execut
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2404
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060039
Title:
[Ubuntu-24.04] FADump with recommended crash size is mak
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-30 09:57 EDT---
Eddy asked me to have a look at it while he is on vacation.
The root cause seems to be that DFLTCC-enabled gunzip behaves
differently on truncated archives:
# ls -l rstb_567931_cea0d3b3uMHc.out.log.gz
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 5090 Oc
--- Comment From jre...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-28 05:37 EDT---
This is a duplicate of Launchpad Bug #2083131 ("Bash's builtin command "printf"
has a grave functionality bug - fails to print the format like "%.2f .1""):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/2083131
The major diff
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2076147 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076147
--- Comment From anushree.math...@ibm.com 2024-10-28 00:38 EDT---
I tried the below scenarios as mentioned by Kautuk, i already updated Kautuk
regarding this!
Steps for 1st scenario:
i) Stop stres
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #1 - Boris Barth - 2024-10-24 09:55:01 ==
---Problem Description---
bash printf of floating point value fails on Ubuntu 24.10
---uname output---
Linux tuxmaker 6.11.0-8-generic #8-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 16 12:49:35 UTC 2024
s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux
Machine Typ
--- Comment From vpuli...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-24 12:21 EDT---
Hi Team,
I ran pgbench read-only test 10 times on Ubuntu 24.04 L2 Guest(kernel :
6.8.0-47-generic) with CEDE On and CEDE Off using ppc64_cpu --dscr=23.
L2 Guest(kernel : 6.8.0-47-generic) with CEDE On with dscr=23.
Scaling Fa
--- Comment From jre...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-24 11:26 EDT---
Maybe related to this debian bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079105
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1079105
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079105
--
You received this bug not
--- Comment From ca...@us.ibm.com 2024-10-24 19:49 EDT---
Valgrind has a check that the L=6 option is only valid for ISA 3.1. If L=6 on
non ISA 3.1 systems, Valgrind reports an error.
Per the discussion with Peter and testing the dcbf instruction on Power
9 and Power 10. The hardware "a
--- Comment From vpuli...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-24 12:10 EDT---
Note : Above results are with ppc64_cpu --dscr=0.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070253
Title:
KVM on PowerVM: L
--- Comment From vpuli...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-24 10:01 EDT---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Vijay, Can you verify this bug ?
Hi,
I ran pgbenach 5 times on Ubuntu 24.04 L2 Guest(kernel :
6.8.0-47-generic) with CEDE On and CEDE Off. I could see upto 50%
degradation on L2-Guest CEDE ON vs L2-Gu
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-210346 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083700
Title:
rsyslog FTBFS (s390x only) against zlib
1:1.
--- Comment From vpuli...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-24 01:30 EDT---
Hi,
PSP doesn't have a KVM environment now.
Can you share your setup with the patch so that I can try DT7 and EDB
runs there itself. I need a couple of hours on KVM setup to get this
done.
Thanks
--- Comment From sthou...@
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-24 01:24 EDT---
Vijay, Can you verify this bug ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070253
Title:
KVM on PowerVM: L2 Guest-Aggressive
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-10-23 19:31 EDT---
CC'ing Carl who is going to modify Valgrind to accept the L=4 and L6= versions
of dcbf on older cpus.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-23 11:25 EDT---
(In reply to comment #34)
> Kowshik, please try increasing the memory reserved for fadump from
> 512M to 768M or 1024M and see if that results in a successful dump
> capture..
I tried FADump with both 768M and 1024M reserved
--- Comment From hbath...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-22 14:01 EDT---
Note that kfence fix brings down the memory requirement for fadump
capture kernel but does not guarantee a success dump capture. So,
fadump capture kernel hitting OOM in this case does not have to be
considered a test fail. Also,
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-22 04:51 EDT---
I think it is better to leave the commit as is and we can think of pros and
cons with setting CONFIG_KFENCE to 'n' for ppc64el.
What do you say @Hari Kirshna, @Hariharan ?
--
You received this bug notification because you
--- Comment From mhart...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-22 04:13 EDT---
I've verified that:
+ the new version of zgetdump supports Secure Execution guest dump decryption
and that it works
+ the manpage and help of zgetdump has been updated
+ zgetdump regression tests have passed
+ pvattest regression
--- Comment From anushree.math...@ibm.com 2024-10-17 11:13 EDT---
Hi fheimes,
I have tried with macvtap network and it is working fine in this scenario too!
ANALYSIS
HOST[SOURCE](Non-MDC):
OS : ubuntu
Kernel: 6.8.0-48-generic
qemu : QEMU emulator version 8.2.2 (Debian 1:8.2.2+ds-0ubuntu1.2
--- Comment From anushree.math...@ibm.com 2024-10-17 09:30 EDT---
Hi fheimes!
I have done the testing with macvtap bridge and this scenario is also
working fine!
HOST[SOURCE](MDC):
OS : ubuntu
Kernel: 6.8.0-48-generic
qemu : QEMU emulator version 8.2.2 (Debian 1:8.2.2+ds-0ubuntu1.2)
libvi
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-17 09:21 EDT---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Man thanks Gautam for the successful verification!
> (I'm updating the tags accordingly ...)
--- Comment From ubuntu-kernel-bot 2024-10-17 17:37:45 UTC---
This bug is awaiting verification that the
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074380
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] s390/cpum_cf: make crypto counters upward compatible
To manage n
--- Comment From anushree.math...@ibm.com 2024-10-16 16:44 EDT---
HOST[SOURCE](non-MDC):
OS : ubuntu
Kernel: 6.8.0-48-generic
qemu : QEMU emulator version 8.2.2 (Debian 1:8.2.2+ds-0ubuntu1.2)
libvirt : libvirtd (libvirt) 10.0.0
HOST[DESTINATION](NON-MDC)
OS: ubuntu
Kernel: 6.8.0-48-generic
--- Comment From anushree.math...@ibm.com 2024-10-16 14:31 EDT---
I will be doing 1 more testing with macvtap network and update that analysis
also by tomorrow afternoon!
Thanks,
Anushree Mathur
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
--- Comment From anushree.math...@ibm.com 2024-10-16 13:44 EDT---
I updated the logs for the different bugzilla to this bugzilla. Now updating
the bugzilla along with proper logs to specify that it is working fine!
HOST[SOURCE](MDC):
OS : ubuntu
Kernel: 6.8.0-48-generic
qemu : QEMU emulat
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2204
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074380
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] s390/cpum_cf: make crypto counters upward
--- Comment (attachment only) From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-16 07:49
EDT---
** Attachment added: "Console logs after triggering FADump"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060039/+attachment/5828617/+files/Console_log.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-16 07:56 EDT---
(In reply to comment #26)
> root@ubuntu2404:~# cat /proc/cmdline
> BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinux-6.8.0-48-generic root=/dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-ubuntu--lv
> ro fadump=on fadump_reserve_mem=512M
>
>
> root@ubuntu2404:~# dmesg | grep -i re
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-16 07:47 EDT---
I have verified bug on 6.8.0-48-generic kernel and the issue is still getting
recreated.
My system had 15G Memory and according to the recommendation here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ppc64el/Recommendations I had reserved 512M
--- Comment From tmri...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-16 06:27 EDT---
I have installed the proposed kernel jammy-proposed on a new machine and can
confirm that the patch is included in the build.
The crypto counters are displayed
root@b83lp65:~# uname -a
Linux b83lp65.lnxne.boe 5.15.0-125-generic #1
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-16 03:47 EDT---
--
Created attachment 161091 [details]
guest xml for cpu hotplug test
Hi fheimes,
Yes i agree, these all bugs are same!
I have validated on my system
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-16 02:17 EDT---
Test team will be able to conclude and validate the bug soon as possible. will
update the bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-16 02:18 EDT---
Test team will be able to conclude and validate the bug soon as possible. will
update the bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2076147 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076147
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-16 02:18 EDT---
Test team will be able to conclude and validate the bug soon as possible. will
update the bug.
--
You received this bug notification be
--- Comment From ar...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-15 13:48 EDT---
Since the underlying issue is probably due to a design flaw that needs to be
fixed in common code, I opened an upstream Bug for this:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32278
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla
--- Comment From gautam.mengh...@ibm.com 2024-10-15 05:20 EDT---
I verified that this bug no longer replicates with the kernel version -
6.8.0-48.48
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
--- Comment From gautam.mengh...@ibm.com 2024-10-15 04:23 EDT---
The patch for fixing this problem has been sent upstream
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240930141713.358654-1-gau...@linux.ibm.com/
I will mention the commit id once the patch has been accepted
--
You received this bug no
--- Comment From anushree.math...@ibm.com 2024-10-14 03:01 EDT---
I have tried the scenario as mentioned here
https://bugzilla.linux.ibm.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207985 and it is working fine in
my case. The only difference is i have tried with default bridge not with
macvtap.
Here is my ana
--- Comment From fran...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-11 07:03 EDT---
I'll add to that:
The KVM + QEMU changes will allow us to create a dump with extra data which
s390-tools consumes and converts to the traditional dump format. Being able to
create such a dump before the tools are available is sti
--- Comment From rajanikanth...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-09 02:40 EDT---
This issue is fixed.
Ref https://bugzilla.linux.ibm.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206737#c35
Thanks
** Bug watch added: bugzilla.linux.ibm.com/ #206737
https://bugzilla.linux.ibm.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206737
--
You received this
--- Comment From mhart...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-09 10:59 EDT---
@Boris
Yep, but it's easy to resolve the conflict. In case of the original
patch, ngdump support was already added to zdump (but I guess we don't
want to pick those patches as well).
8ddc31ea7741 ("zdump: Implement NGDump helper
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-09 09:46 EDT---
Thanks @Marc for providing the list of patches/ commits that are required for a
SRU to Ubuntu 22.04 (with s390-tools 2.20.0-0ubuntu3.3 which is the current
version in jammy).
The last patch cannot be applied cleanly (because
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-10-07 22:21 EDT---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Actually, looking closer, this isn't what valgrind is complaining about.
> I'm a looking deeper.
The pmdk code change where this was introduced was:
- /* issue a dcbst instruction for the
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-10-07 21:30 EDT---
(In reply to comment #8)
> ...so this is a user source error. The fix is:
>
> --- a/src/libpmem2/ppc64/init.c
> +++ b/src/libpmem2/ppc64/init.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ ppc_flush(const void *addr, size_t size)
> * Acco
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-10-07 20:50 EDT---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Last 30 lines of memcheck5.log below (whole file has 65 lines).
> pmempool_feature/TEST5 memcheck5.log ==1397154== Illegal opcode at address
> 0x4B59240
> pmempool_feature/TEST5 memcheck5.log ==1397154==
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-07 10:58 EDT---
I've extracted the compression logic into a stand-alone script, and it doesn't
fail:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import gzip
import struct
import zlib
value = b"ABABABABABABABABABAB\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00Z"
compressed =
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-07 10:23 EDT---
export DFLTCC=0 makes the problem go away, so it must be zlib. I will
investigate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207626
Public bug reported:
===
=== Reported by Peter Oberparleiter ===
===
---Problem Description---
Ubuntu installations performed in IBM Z LPAR via an HMC drive block for a
prolonged time (multiple days), making this installatio
--- Comment From gautam.mengh...@ibm.com 2024-10-07 08:06 EDT---
No we won't revert the commits, we'll be sending a fix for this issue upstream
soon. We'll mark it for stable as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
--- Comment From fran...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-07 07:03 EDT---
Verified on 5.15.0-125-generic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959940
Title:
[22.10 FEAT] KVM: Secure Execution gue
--- Comment From gautam.mengh...@ibm.com 2024-10-07 05:51 EDT---
Update on the root cause:
This bug is observed when at L1 level, vcpu->arch.vcore->lpcr has
LPCR_MER set. This happens in the following situation:
1. When triggering a crash, a NMI is sent to a running vCPU that had LPCR_MER
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-04 07:22 EDT---
(In reply to comment #39)
> informed the test team. will update the test results.
tested.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-04 07:11 EDT---
tested
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075575
Title:
kexec fails in LPAR when some cpus are disabled
To manage no
--- Comment From gautam.mengh...@ibm.com 2024-10-04 06:49 EDT---
I tested this scenario with the ubuntu kernel version "6.8.0-48-generic" which
was obtained from "noble-proposed" repo and I can confirm that this bug is not
reproducible and kexec works fine.
--
You received this bug noti
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-04 04:40 EDT---
rejecting based on
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076147
Title:
Add 'mm: hold PTL from the first PTE while reclai
--- Comment From vajai...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-04 02:40 EDT---
This is going to be a PHYP fix rather than a ubuntu kernel fix. Hence
requesting closure of the bug and the patch that canonical has mentioned and
provided a build for is not needed for *this specific* bug.
~ Vaibhav
--
You r
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-04 01:44 EDT---
informed the test team will update the test results.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070253
Title:
KVM on PowerVM:
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-04 01:45 EDT---
informed the test team. will update the test results.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070358
Title:
[Ubuntu 24.04]
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-04 01:43 EDT---
informed the team. will update the test results.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075575
Title:
kexec fails in LPAR
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-04 01:44 EDT---
informed the test team. will update the test results.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076147
Title:
Add 'mm: hold
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-04 01:43 EDT---
informed test team. will update the test results.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076406
Title:
L2 Guest migration
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-10-04 01:42 EDT---
have notified the test team. will update the test results.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076866
Title:
Guest cra
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-210029 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076269
Title:
invalid base64 encoded gzip data on s390x caus
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin22045
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060108
Title:
greenlet 3.0.3 fails to build on ppc64el (and riscv64)
--- Comment From fran...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-01 04:59 EDT---
Verified the proposed package with the PPA kernel by fheimes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959966
Title:
[23.04
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-09-26 06:47 EDT---
@Canonical / Zixing Liu:
Can you please have a look at Jonas' comment above and let us know if these
values are actually passed between functions in your test cases, or if they are
only internal to the function they live in?
--- Comment From jonas.paulss...@ibm.com 2024-09-24 05:11 EDT---
As this is not supported by either GCC or Clang, we may have to begin
supporting this incrementally. There is not yet an ABI defined for 16-bit
floats that says how they are passed between functions. At this moment it would
1 - 100 of 1652 matches
Mail list logo
