This is surprising to me in at least two levels:
a) Why wasn't this caught before? Seems so basic
b) The slapd apparmor profile doesn't seem to be applied by default. It
used to be, or so I thought.
Did you have to enable it by hand? I checked and there is nothing in the
slapd maintainer scripts
should be attached to the bug in comments per
target series of the SRU for the SRU Team (Andreas Hasenack) to review.
Requeriments:
Some azure VM are required to test this package, as it contains
specific configurations for Ubuntu on Azure. An Azure account and
SRU reviewing this now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2116077
Title:
[SRU] azure-vm-utils updates
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so
Confirmed for questing as well.
** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu Questing)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: op
The build log of openldap non plucky[1] has this:
dh_apparmor -pslapd --profile-name=usr.sbin.slapd
dh_apparmor: warning: All requested packages have been excluded (e.g. via a
Build-Profile or due to architecture restrictions).
uh-oh
1. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/782470240/buildlog_ubuntu-p
Marking as "public security" until we know more.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2119884
Title:
slapd fails to start under systemd
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
Sponsored for plucky:
Uploading azure-proxy-agent_1.0.30-0ubuntu4~25.04.1.dsc
Uploading azure-proxy-agent_1.0.30-0ubuntu4~25.04.1.debian.tar.xz
Uploading azure-proxy-agent_1.0.30-0ubuntu4~25.04.1_source.buildinfo
Uploading azure-proxy-agent_1.0.30-0ubuntu4~25.04.1_source.changes
** Changed in: a
** Also affects: azure-proxy-agent (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: azure-proxy-agent (Ubuntu Questing)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Gauthier Jolly (gjolly)
Status: Fix Released
** Description changed:
Since we stopped logging to a
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
* Bluetooth mouse does not reconnect after turning bluetooth off and on
on the ubuntu machine after pairing the device.
* If you forget the device and re-pair it, it works until the next
bluetooth disconnect.
[ Test Plan ]
* Make sure the device is not alread
Uploaded to questing:
Uploading containerd-app_2.1.3-0ubuntu2.dsc
Uploading containerd-app_2.1.3-0ubuntu2.debian.tar.xz
Uploading containerd-app_2.1.3-0ubuntu2_source.buildinfo
Uploading containerd-app_2.1.3-0ubuntu2_source.changes
** Changed in: containerd-app (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~danpdraper/ubuntu/+source/azure-proxy-agent/+git/azure-proxy-agent/+merge/489921
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115197
Title:
** Summary changed:
- [SRU] azure-proxy-agent 1.0.30-0ubuntu2
+ [SRU] Backport azure-proxy-agent 1.0.30-0ubuntu3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115197
Title:
[SRU] Backport azure-pr
> We have yet to incorporate the agent into any other live Ubuntu
releases.
a, right. It's going to be a new package there, so there is no
"previous behavior". Sorry it took me so long to grok that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
autopkgtests have cleared, I'll proceed with the verification.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2116098
Title:
Windows security hardening locks out schannel'ed netlogon dc calls
To man
There is a new samba version in questing, 4.22.3, perhaps it could be
tested to see if there is any change. But nothing in the release notes
jumps out as being a change that addressed the scenario described in
this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074073
Title:
RTC access broke
Still no news here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2108972
Title:
fence-agents-extra binary does not contain fence_amt_ws from source-
package
To manage notifications about this bu
I'll change the status to "won't fix", which I think is more realistic.
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106024
Title:
This is the error:
2024-10-26T09:10:34.314706Z 0 [System] [MY-013172] [Server] Received SHUTDOWN
from user . Shutting down mysqld (Version:
8.0.39-0ubuntu0.24.04.2).
2024-10-26T09:10:35.682524Z 0 [System] [MY-010910] [Server] /usr/sbin/mysqld:
Shutdown complete (mysqld 8.0.39-0ubuntu0.24.04.2)
** Changed in: containerd-app (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
** Changed in: containerd-app (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Tags added: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-release-
upgrader has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report. In the event tha
Doing an early release because of the 24.04.3 release this Thursday.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2111715
Title:
On RISC-V check if hardware is RVA23 capable
To manage notification
This is an unfortunate situation. We strive to have the bug fixed in
later releases all the way up to devel before the SRU is released. But
here we have to weigh in the following:
- there is a big benefit in releasing this set of fixes for noble now, as the
24.04.3 release is imminent, and this r
This is an unfortunate situation. We strive to have the bug fixed in
later releases all the way up to devel before the SRU is released. But
here we have to weigh in the following:
- there is a big benefit in releasing this set of fixes for noble now, as the
24.04.3 release is imminent, and this r
This is an unfortunate situation. We strive to have the bug fixed in
later releases all the way up to devel before the SRU is released. But
here we have to weigh in the following:
- there is a big benefit in releasing this set of fixes for noble now, as the
24.04.3 release is imminent, and this r
This is an unfortunate situation. We strive to have the bug fixed in
later releases all the way up to devel before the SRU is released. But
here we have to weigh in the following:
- there is a big benefit in releasing this set of fixes for noble now, as the
24.04.3 release is imminent, and this r
Public bug reported:
Hello,
there is a notably newer upstream version available.
Quoting:
8<
The 5.0.0 release includes the following changes to the previous
release 4.9.1:
Rewritten authentication mechanism
Add escape %T to show current tty for window
Add escape %O to s
Ok, that strikes out (a), (c), (e), (f), and you verified (b) and (d). I
guess scenarios that start from plucky were meant to test that the same
fix is in questing, but we don't require actual sru testing for the
devel release, just the presence of the fix there.
--
You received this bug notifica
Hi Heinrich, thanks for the verification.
The test plan lists a few upgrade tests. I reproduce them below, and
have them itemized for easy reference:
a) Test that Ubuntu 22.04 Jammy can be upgraded to Ubuntu 24.04 Noble on RVA20
hardware.
b) Test that Ubuntu 24.04 Noble cannot be upgraded to Plu
Thank you for these verifications!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2118617
Title:
[SRU] Ubuntu on WSL install fails on non-ASCII usernames
To manage notifications about this bug go to
The noble verification was done in comment #4, for ubuntu0.2. The
ubuntu0.3 and 0.4 uploads were to address the s390x build-time test
failures only.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The verification of the Stable Release Update for wsl-setup has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
Given this package is used in a very specific environment (wsl), not
seeded elsewhere in ubuntu other than in ubuntu-wsl, and that we don't
expect further testing by the community because of that, it's my
assessment that this is fine to be released to updates before the
customary 7 day aging period
So we are missing this test then:
"""
1. Follow the ISO QA "WSL_cloud-init" test case using an image built with
wsl-setup containing the
patches herein proposed. No deviation from the tests should happen.
"""
This requires a new image build, right, with wsl-setup from proposed?
--
You rec
The verification of the Stable Release Update for spirv-llvm-
translator-18 has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report. In the event th
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gtk4 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a reg
> - test that src:primus builds and binaries install without changes
I performed this test as well, in a noble amd64 container, unpacking
src:primus, installing build-dependencies with noble-proposed enabled, and
manually installing bin:libglapi-amber which replaced bin:libglapi-mesa. The
buil
> To ease testing on Noble I uploaded wsl-setup 0.5.10 to a PPA from
where I built WSL images:
Why did you have to use a PPA?
Is that binary an exact copy of the binary currently in proposed? If you
sha256 both, do you get the same results?
--
You received this bug notification because you are
The verification of the Stable Release Update for base-files has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounte
noble verification (continued)
e) ppc64el
- autopkgtests are suffering from tmpfail since about a month, likewise for
migration-reference/0
- no build failure
- ppc64el build log:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/809042255/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-ppc64el.gtk4_4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.4_BUILDING.txt.gz
Considering comments #17, #18, and #19, noble verification is done.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2119
noble verification (continued)
c) armhf
- no autopkgtest failure
- no build failure:
- armhf build log:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/809037926/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.gtk4_4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.4_BUILDING.txt.gz
Tests match previous results:
x11:
Ok: 578
Expected Fail:
noble verification
a) amd64
- no autopkgtest failure
- no build failure:
- amd64 build log:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/809040749/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-amd64.gtk4_4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.4_BUILDING.txt.gz
Tests match previous results:
x11:
Ok: 655
Expected Fail: 0
Fail:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2119460 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2119460
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2119460
ValueError: list.remove(x): x not in list
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Public bug reported:
As seen in [1]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/ubuntu-drivers", line 536, in
greet()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/click/core.py", line 1157, in __call__
return self.main(*args, **kwargs)
^^
File "/usr
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
There are a number of gtk4 tests (build-time, and again at autopkgtest
time) that are failing on s390x *only* when run in the combination of an
updated mesa package (25.0.7-0ubuntu0.24.04.1).
s390x is not a desktop platform, there are no desktop i
Robie did a review in matrix and gave a +1 with certain conditions
outlined in the thread[1].
1.
https://matrix.to/#/!QMtJBibTYYOCvXJEdv:ubuntu.com/$TY6EA0eKrpqKf8wsChVKNnj1Xg513kfbzDz1Da-
KbU4?via=ubuntu.com&via=matrix.org&via=matrix.debian.social
--
You received this bug notification because
Uploaded to noble unapproved with -v4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.1:
Uploading gtk4_4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.4.dsc
Uploading gtk4_4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.4.debian.tar.xz
Uploading gtk4_4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.4_source.buildinfo
Uploading gtk4_4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.4_source.changes
--
You received this bug notification because
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
There are a number of gtk4 tests (build-time, and again at autopkgtest
time) that are failing on s390x *only* when run in the combination of an
updated mesa package (25.0.7-0ubuntu0.24.04.1).
s390x is not a desktop platform, there are no desktop i
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
There are a number of gtk4 tests (build-time, and again at autopkgtest
time) that are failing on s390x *only* when run in the combination of an
updated mesa package (25.0.7-0ubuntu0.24.04.1).
s390x is not a desktop platform, there are no desktop i
Tests that are failing with TIMEOUT on s390x, from the test logs:
657/666 gtk:reftest / reftest background-positioning-area-empty.ui
TIMEOUT 90.14s killed by signal 15 SIGTERM
658/666 gtk:reftest / reftest border-color-default.ui
TIMEOUT
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ There are a number of gtk4 tests (build-time, and again at autopkgtest
+ time) that are failing on s390x *only* when run in the combination of an
+ updated mesa package (25.0.7-0ubuntu0.24.04.1).
+
+ s390x is not a desktop platform, there are no desktop i
Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gtk4 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk4/4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
Marking the main task of gtk4 as fix released, because we haven't seen
this problem in questing (or plucky).
** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gtk4 (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gtk4 (Ubun
Hello Graham, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gtk4 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk4/4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
Thanks for the detailed verification!
This looks good to me for release monday morning start-of-day (plucky &
noble).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1712808
Title:
udev interface fai
Hello Ural, or anyone else affected,
Accepted base-files into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-
files/13ubuntu10.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
> The version of snapd INSIDE the container matters. Once that is
updated, the bug should be gone.
So what happens when we update deb snapd inside this container that has
errors in "snap changes"? Or does that not help, and we need an actual
image with 2.68.5 baked in for first boot?
--
You rece
Hello Hector, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-media-driver into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-
media-driver/24.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing t
Please add a playback test as well, since ffmpeg is exercising the
conversion path. I can see that it's probably the same codepath, but
having a video playing on screen is always a nice comforting check :)
** Changed in: intel-media-driver (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committe
The check that was added was looking for the grub config file, and if
update-grub exists. Are this criteria met in what you described in
comment #17?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21190
We need 3 tests according to the test plan, and only one was done (in
comment #15). Reverting verification flags.
** Tags removed: verification-done-noble
** Tags added: verification-needed-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu Noble)
Milestone: ubuntu-24.04.3 => None
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Critical => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2119
** Also affects: subiquity (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu Noble)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.3
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Would have been great if the systemd override could somehow remain in
place where it's needed, perhaps with a conditional, so that even users
of older wsl releases would keep their behavior.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Hello Carlos, or anyone else affected,
Accepted wsl-setup into plucky-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-
setup/0.5.10~25.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
Hello Carlos, or anyone else affected,
Accepted wsl-setup into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-
setup/0.5.10~24.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
Thank you for the detailed verification!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886414
Title:
the chromium snap takes a long time to install without visible user
feedback, seems stuck
To
> I installed thunderbird and saw snapd tasks reported.
In the plucky verification you used chromium instead of thunderbird, I
presume that thunderbird was showing the same problem, and/or that for
some reason chromium wasn't a good reproducer anymore in plucky?
--
You received this bug notifica
Thank you for the detailed verification!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966203
Title:
journal shows "systemd-udevd[2837]: nvme0n1: Process ... failed with
exit code 1."
To manage
Thank you for the detailed verification!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072987
Title:
Add /usr/bin/setpriv to the AppArmor template / allow list
To manage notifications about this b
Thank you for the detailed verification!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2109843
Title:
snapd.seeded.service has considerably slowed down
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Thank you for the detailed verification!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089195
Title:
notification that snap will quit and update in -1064462318 minutes,
but snap has no updates av
I don't understand. The test plan seemed very clear cut:
"""
1. Produce error with snapd 2.66.1 deb
snap install lxd --channel=5.0/stable
lxd init (use defaults)
lxc launch -c security.privileged=true ubuntu:20.04 private-2004
lxc exec private-2004 -- bash
snap changes < there should be an err
** Description changed:
[SRU] 2.68.5:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/2098137
[ Impact ]
Error containing "cannot reload udev rules: exit status X" when doing an
actions e.g. installation of core on a privileged container.
[ Test Plan ]
1. Produce err
Hello Juerg, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lowlatency-kernel into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lowlatency-
kernel/1.3~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader into plucky-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/1:25.04.18
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gtk4 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk4/4.14.5+ds-0ubuntu0.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
The comment above is not correct, as per what I wrote in comment #29.
This bug is now open again, with no fix in proposed, and I will change
the tags/status to reflect that.
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
** Tags removed: verification-neede
Hello Cyrus, or anyone else affected,
Accepted livecd-rootfs into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-
rootfs/24.04.92 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Juerg, or anyone else affected,
Accepted livecd-rootfs into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-
rootfs/24.04.92 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Heads up: we have a more pressing fix[1] for livecd-rootfs for the noble
24.04.3 point release, and the change to fix this bug here will be
reverted in that upload.
1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lowlatency-kernel/+bug/2119012
--
You received this bug notification because you are
I retried the noble builds.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2116166
Title:
Tecla lacks accessibility when showing available keys
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
There is already a livecd-rootfs upload in noble-proposed, fixing LP:
#2069391, which still needs verification.
1. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/24.04.90
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
Hi @AaronMa, I see you did the verification in comments #24 and #25, but
there have been new uploads of spirv-llvm-translator-*. Would you be
able to repeat the verification with those new packages? If not, is
there confidence that a new verification is not needed, and what would
be the justificati
> After reloading the page, it is working.
Yes, launchpad quirk. It only works after reloading the page :/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115197
Title:
[SRU] azure-proxy-agent 1.0.3
Hello Dave, or anyone else affected,
Accepted u-boot into plucky-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/2025.01-1~0ubuntu2.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
> [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition case 5
I just notied that the case #5 has a versionless Provides, and here (and
in noble, and in questing), we have it with:
Breaks: u-boot-amlogic (<= 2024.01+dfsg-3)
Replaces: u-boot-amlogic (<= 2024.01+dfsg-3)
+Provides: u-boot-amlogic (= 2024
> There is an omission in the preceding comment
You can edit comments :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2115197
Title:
[SRU] azure-proxy-agent 1.0.30-0ubuntu2
To manage notification
> Note that the reversion of the logging behaviour change _only_ applies to
> Plucky; I decided to leave the
> logging behaviour change intact for Questing, Noble, and Jammy, as it mirrors
> an upstream change.
So:
jammy SRU: logging changed from /var/log/azure-proxy-agent to journal
noble SRU:
I tried a run with more debugging enabled, but only enabled it on the
AD/DC side, and that told me nothing[1].
Next step would be to either interactively run this test on ppc64el, and
then troubleshoot if the failure happens, or change the test to also
collect logs from the member server, and not
In plucky (25.04) and oracular (24.10), samba-dsdb-modules is depended
on by bin:samba-ad-dc only indeed. This was different in older releases.
In noble 24.04, samba-dsdb-modules was recommended by bin:samba and
bin:samba-common-bin, so much more likely to be installed.
The change happened in 33
Public bug reported:
Not sure how to word this one but I'll try:
I've got a server with 2 Network-Interfaces, `ens160` and `ens192`.
There's 3 files in `/etc/netplan/:
/etc/netplan/00-installer-config.yaml.BeforeVMwareCustomization
```yaml
# This is the network config written by 'subiquity'
netwo
** Changed in: realmd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: realmd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2119081
Title:
ssd and real
Hello Mate, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cd-boot-images-riscv64 into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-
boot-images-riscv64/12.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new packa
> Users still running older versions of WSL will find up-to-date documentation
> about this topic at:
> https://documentation.ubuntu.com/wsl/latest/explanation/binfmt/
Can you elaborate on what will happen to users of older versions of wsl
if they apply this update? Do they need to take some man
Hello Mate, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cd-boot-images-ppc64el into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-
boot-images-ppc64el/17.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new packa
Hello Mate, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cd-boot-images-arm64 into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-
boot-images-arm64/23.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Mate, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cd-boot-images-amd64 into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-
boot-images-amd64/27.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for iproute2 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
1 - 100 of 24465 matches
Mail list logo
