[Bug 1023214] Re: bogus utime and stime in /proc/

2013-08-17 Thread alecm3
@Stephen Croll :Do you know if this patch has been incorporated into 12.04LTS? What about 10.04LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023214 Title: bogus utime and stime in /proc/https:

[Bug 1023214] Re: bogus utime and stime in /proc/

2012-08-03 Thread alecm3
I have a 2.6.32-40-server production machine that just entered this state after a month of normal operations. If anyone is interested, I can collect more data from it. So far, # ps -o pid,pcpu,time -p3061 PID %CPU TIME 3061 14157 1184014533-20:50:00 # cat /proc/3061/stat 3061 (mysqld) S 2

[Bug 1023214] Re: bogus utime and stime in /proc/

2012-07-12 Thread alecm3
@brad-figg re: option 2 I could potentially try a backported kernel, do I need to use Oneiric or I can go with Pangolin, because Pangolin is LTS? This upgrade would require some preparation and scheduling, I cannot do it immediately. -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 1023214] Re: bogus utime and stime in /proc/

2012-07-12 Thread alecm3
I upgraded several machines to 2.6.32-41-server about a week ago, which seems to be the latest 10.04 LTS kernel. If the bug occurs on 2.6.32-41-server, I will add information immediately. I am not very optimistic about this upgrade, since the diff of fs/proc/array.c between 2.6.32-41-server and 2.6

[Bug 1023214] Re: bogus utime and stime in /proc/

2012-07-11 Thread alecm3
I am not sure why it's marked "medium" importance: it keeps happening on all our production servers. Unfortunately, this bug will cause us to switch distributions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 1023214] Re: bogus utime and stime in /proc/

2012-07-10 Thread alecm3
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023214 Title: bogus utime and stime in /proc/https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1023214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list u

[Bug 1023214] Re: bogus utime and stime in /proc/

2012-07-10 Thread alecm3
** Description changed: I administer a large number of servers, and I have this problem only with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS: I run a server under normal load (say load average 3.0 on an 8-core server). The "top" command shows processes taking certain % of CPU that cause this load average: say -

[Bug 1023214] [NEW] bogus utime and stime in /proc/

2012-07-10 Thread alecm3
Public bug reported: I administer a large number of servers, and I have this problem only with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS: I run a server under normal load (say load average 3.0 on an 8-core server). The "top" command shows processes taking certain % of CPU that cause this load average: say PID USER

[Bug 546091] Re: 10.04 Installer doesn't properly detect 9240 MegaRaid SAS Controlers

2010-10-21 Thread alecm3
Can you post instructions on how to use patches from this bug? We have IBM x3550 M3, but I do not know how to use these patches. 10.04.2 LTS is only on Jan 27, we cannot wait that long- we will have to install SuSE on production machines instead. -- 10.04 Installer doesn't properly detect 9240 Me

[Bug 57091] Re: proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies=1 should be seriously considered to permit SYN flood defense...

2008-09-12 Thread alecm3
We installed 2 production servers and suddenly we started getting strange connection problems, with no errors in the application or system logs. The problems were highly intermittent, but amounted to being unable to connect to a port our TCP server was receiving client internet connections on. Aft

[Bug 243434] Re: Ubuntu 8.04 hangs during install

2008-08-18 Thread alecm3
Same thing here: hangs at 2% "Retrieving binutils-static-udeb" This is an ancient Rackable Systems server 2x PIII 850 GHz, 1x SCSI 18GB Seagate drive and 512MB RAM Tyan I am typing as I investigate the problem, since I have a drawer full of old hardware. 1) Switching CD-ROM from IDE1 channel t