autoremove and Reran...failed...rebooted and system came up saying it is
running 20.04.3.
go figure...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942798
Title:
package initramfs-tools 0.136ubun
Public bug reported:
Upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04.3 failed. An upgrade may not succeed your system
may be unusable...etc.
Retrying install is failing again this time due to space on /boot...will make
space and retry.
I am presuming that the install pointing to URL generated a message to
the
is that the Peter Selinger of trading accounts fame that commented
above?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365065
Title:
gnucash is confused by timezone changes
To manage notifications
shiba satellite here same issue infact all my v18 do this I believe
I seen same issue a previous releases years and years ago though...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767322
Title:
Steps to reproduce:
---
1. Fresh install of Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic via Latest
(http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current) as of 14 Feb 2018
2. Run the following:
sudo apt update
sudo apt install -y openjdk*
Workaround:
---
1. Remove OpenJDK 10; Run the following:
Hardware: NVidia GeForce GTX 850M/PCIe/SSE2
Intel® Core™ i7-5500U CPU @ 2.40GHz × 4
Steps to reproduce on Bionic (18.04 dev)
1. Install normal (Gnome desktop on wayland)
2. Install xubuntu-desktop
3. At some point the installation will ask for changing display manager to
lightdm. Agre
Public bug reported:
Intention: Dual boot Windows 10 and Ubuntu
Partition Layout:
1. LVM of 250 GiB on mount point / with ext4,
2. LVM SWAP of 12 GiB,
3. Primary ext4 partition on mount point /boot of 48 GiB
4. Set mount point of /boot/efi on existing Windows 10 boot partition marked
System_R
I am running UBUNTU Trusty 14.04.1 LTS as my OS. I am not running UBUNTU
15.10 ubiquity.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1506169
Title:
if linux metapackage is installed software prope
This is my current workaround patch, which seems to work fairly well:
sed -i 's/if init_is_upstart/if false \&\& init_is_upstart/ig'
/etc/init.d/networking
Simply changes all instances of "if init_is_upstart" to "if false &&
init_is_upstart".
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
More than a year later and no action.. Unbelievable.
I made the mistake of attempting to deploy Trusty for a new DNS server.
Spent about an hour attempting to migrate the old IP to the new box.
None of the workarounds were successful -- including the 13.10 scripts
the previously worked. Only rebo
Server admins have been restarting networking with init scripts for many
years, and for me personally it was rather disturbing to find this no
longer works -- as well as to read some of the comments here.
Networking that cannot be reliably restarted in the same manner it's
brought up at boot time i
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1324721 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1324721
Was not given an opportunity to aggree or disagree. App loaded 75% and
stalled. When I got back to desktop, there was the eula to agree or
disagree. Apt showed that it was loaded and installed.
--
You rece
apport information
** Attachment added: "SambaInstalledVersions.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276414/+attachment/4061926/+files/SambaInstalledVersions.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected precise running-unity
** Description changed:
The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action,
was called for PID 8302 (/usr/sbin/smbd).
This means there was a problem with the program, such as a segfault.
Below is a
apport information
** Attachment added: "SMBConf.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276414/+attachment/4061925/+files/SMBConf.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276414
Title:
I'll go do that here is just a few minutes.
Not sure what the results will be since the report was 2 months ago.
And yes, if I go across the LAN to the Ubuntu server and store and retrieve
files across the LAN, I can repeat the Panic.
Bill
At 04:16 PM 04/02/14, you wrote:
>Thanks for submittin
apport was already installed.
Submission made as requested.
Wm Lewis
At 06:38 PM 3/5/2014, you wrote:
>Thanks for reporting this bug.
>
>If it is possible to install apport on the system, let apport get a
>/var/crash/ report for this failure, and then report that with 'apport
I have apport already installed.
I issued the following command as root "apport-bug
/var/crash/_usr_sbin_smbd.0.crash"
Just to make sure, I will attach a text file with the contents.
Thank you,
Wm Lewis
** Attachment added: "Crash Report"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
y = 1.12 GB used, 3.56 GB total
Virtual memory = 96 kB used, 14.90 GB total
Local disk space = 46.95 GB used, 450.87 GB total
===
Please let me know if you need more information.
Wm Lewis
** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
And another Panic action today. Details below.
-
The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action,
was called for PID 24852 (/usr/sbin/smbd).
This means there was a problem with the program, such as a segfault.
Below is a backtrace for this proce
Another panic or segfault in Samba
This one just occurred right after a reboot of the machine
==
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
0x7f85d6d89c8e in waitpid () fr
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278635
Title:
Panic or segfault in Samba
To manage notifications about this bug g
Sorry. When I ran it the first time, it was from a 'remote' terminal window.
Re-ran from the machine in question.
Bill
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278635
Title:
Panic or segfault
apport information
** Attachment added: "SMBConf.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278635/+attachment/3977467/+files/SMBConf.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278635
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "SambaInstalledVersions.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278635/+attachment/3977468/+files/SambaInstalledVersions.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected precise running-unity
** Description changed:
Panic email supplied this:
The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action,
was called for PID 19000 (/usr/sbin/smbd).
Ok... Done.
At 10:01 PM 2/10/2014, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>So we need some more information. Please run from a terminal window:
>
>apport-collect 1278635
>
>and then change the status of the bug to 'Confirmed'.
>
>Jörg
>
>
>** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
>--
>Yo
Public bug reported:
Panic email supplied this:
The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action,
was called for PID 19000 (/usr/sbin/smbd).
This means there was a problem with the program, such as a segfault.
Below is a backtrace
Public bug reported:
This is now a routine panic email from Samba.
The samba-dbg package is now installed for debugging future panics. Will
send that information when the next panic hits.
Hope the non-debugged info below might help.
Here is system info
==
Public bug reported:
The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action,
was called for PID 8302 (/usr/sbin/smbd).
This means there was a problem with the program, such as a segfault.
Below is a backtrace for this process generated with gdb, which shows
the state of the program at th
Public bug reported:
Every time I connect to network using NetworkManager, 10s is spent on
checking if avahi may be run, which is majority of connecting time.
Control flow is as follows -> NetworkManager -> /sbin/resolvconf ->
/etc/resolvconf/update.d/libc -> /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/avahi-
While clickpad is correctly recognized in 13.10,
the AreaBottomEdge still does not work as expected - fingers outside the area
counts to numFingers
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117965
Public bug reported:
I'm running two operating systems on this toshiba laptop. windows 7 and
ubuntu 12.04 which I prefer. after doing my taxes on turbo tax on the
windows side which I never usebut keep just for programs that don't
work on ubuntuI started having problems with pop ups on my
Public bug reported:
aiccu Number r16218 not found! Have had problems installing AICCU
Package. Thank you for you assistance.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: aiccu 20070115-14.1ubuntu3.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-33.52-generic 3.2.31
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-33-generi
Package will not load. Error report.
** Changed in: amavisd-new (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Rev. Wm. DOC Holliday (r37u2a49ci)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801338
Ti
** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Rev. Wm. DOC Holliday (r37u2a49ci)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045986
Title:
Ubuntu AppArmor policy is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gearman-job-server
In oneiric (11.10), the gearman job server from the "gearman-job-server"
package could be started with the option --libmemcached-servers. In
precise (12.04), this is no longer possible and fails with the following
error message:
Exampl
I've tried some test cases, and confirmed that this problem now 11.10
only occurred in x64 server edition.
** Also affects: openldap
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
@Jorge
I do think that network size/noise must be a big factor. That would
explain those of us who don't or rarely experience crashes at home but
do on our schools' networks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
natty's nifty fast startup also bites the dust in btrfs. 5 minutes
instead of 15 seconds.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601299
Title:
[Maverick/Natty] btrfs is extremely slow
--
u
Seems like if it's not g vs n then there's gotta be something with big
networks that's causing the issue that isn't present with a smaller one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769812
Tit
I believe the issue is related to how the rtl8192ce driver handles
wireless n. I haven't experienced the freezes on my home b/g router but
have them too frequently to practically use wifi on my school's n
network.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
iirc when i first installed lucid/lubuntu/wicd not long ago it was not
available via ubuntu repos, i installed via ppa. now lubuntu is
available via ubuntu repos. i confirm as of last week lubuntu-desktop
via ubuntu repos *requires* network-manager, and adding wicd does not
remove nm. i remove n
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41605462/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41605463/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41605464/Dependencies.txt
** A
Public bug reported:
i got a message that xorg crashed but i'm already in x stage
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Mar 21 21:38:15 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
DkmsStatus: fglrx, 8.660, 2.6.32-16-generic, i686: installed
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/Xorg
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openoffice.org
On a clean install of Ubuntu 9.04 on a MacBook Pro from CD, then running
updates with the Update Manager (I did nothing else whatsoever), I get:
Setting up openoffice.org-emailmerge (1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1) ...
Adding extension /usr/lib/openof
Public bug reported:
My laptop using via chrome, success install 8.04.
Not success install 8.10. (hang/Frezz screen)
Upgrade to 8.10 using online upgrade have the same condition, now I use
8.04 and everything fine except desktop effect.
I have change the driver via on 8.04 with guidance
(https:/
oopback
auto eth0
auto wlan0
iface wlan0 inet dhcp
wireless-essid wm
wireless-key 12345bcdef
--
rtl8185 freezes on connect to network
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
I'm running kubuntu 8.04 and firefox 3 both fully updated. When I'm
using my wired connection everything works fine, but when I disconnect
my wired connection and enable my wireless connection firefox switches
to ofline mode, and konqueror refuses to work. However I can still ping
and ssh from a co
Not actually a bug, just an /etc/iftab problem - sorry
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
networking IRQ problems on Asus K7M motherboard
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50597
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ub
Public bug reported:
I have confirmed this with ne2k-pci and 3c59x modules, with 3c905 and
3c590 cards. The modules initialize fine, and everything looks good in
the kernel messages, but they don't grab an IRQ - eth0 fails to show up
in /proc/interrupts and any attempt to use eth0 with ifconfig or
51 matches
Mail list logo
